Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BT Contract cancelled before a year was completed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I signed up with BT for phone line & broadband when I moved into a flat.

At the time I was told that the line rental was for a year but that the broadband could be cancelled at any time.

I paid the years line rental up front. Six months later I moved out of the flat

 

 

shortly after that, I received an email from BT telling me that, unless I objected, they were going to transfer the supply to someone else.

Because I didn't object I didn't reply and I heard nothing else from BT.

 

SRJ have recently contacted me saying that I owe £208.01.

This comprises £44 for an unpaid bill, £49 for BT Home Hub 3.0, £47.19 Broadband and calls and £30.00.

The last 3 of these are because they claim I cancelled the contract mid-term.

(There's also a refund of £3.78 for broadband and calls and SRJ's fee)

 

I'm trying to get them to send me a full statement of account but have had no success so far.

My view is that none of the three cancellation charges are payable because they all relate to the broadband

that they told me that I could cancel at any time without penalty.

 

 

I'm currently arguing that point with them but the advice I would like is this:

The charges all strike me as damages for breach of contract.

If so BT have a duty to mitigate their losses, which would be the amount that whoever took over the line has paid them.

Am I right?

 

Secondly, I paid the line rental for the whole year.

Shouldn't the amount that covers the period after the line was taken over be deducted from the balance?

 

Thirdly, is the fact that BT cancelled the contract rather than me significant (I suspect not)

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

srj are chancers in fleecing people

 

is your credit file clean?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you need to get it sorted if it is and shows a default!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no default (and my credit score is quite good) but I'm not convinced that its accurate.

There's no mention of either my credit card or my current phone/broadband supplier Plusnet.

 

 

There's also no mention of BT under closed accounts.

(I would expect there to be because I had an undisputed account with them at my current address prior to Plusnet).

There is however an account with Vodafone that I don't have but which is up to date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally when you move out of a flat before the minimum term is up, they cancel the remainder.

 

Did you tell them that you were moving out? Did you take BT at your next place? If so then I can't see their problem.

 

Since you paid the year in advance, that's it, apart from calls.

 

If they emailed you about your broadband, they knew how to contact you about the unpaid calls. Did they? If not, they should have done ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

...There is however an account with Vodafone that I don't have but which is up to date

 

Hi Consett26,

 

If you'd like me to get this looked into, email me with your details via the Contact us form here and quote the code WRT135 - CAG Forum in the subject line.

 

Once sent, you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number. Post back with this and I’ll check I've received it.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Social Media Comms

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally when you move out of a flat before the minimum term is up, they cancel the remainder.

 

Did you tell them that you were moving out? Did you take BT at your next place? If so then I can't see their problem.

 

Since you paid the year in advance, that's it, apart from calls.

 

If they emailed you about your broadband, they knew how to contact you about the unpaid calls. Did they? If not, they should have done ...

The flat was a place to stay while I was working away from home. At home all my telephony is provided by Plusnet. The only contact I've had from BT via email is the one where they said they were going to give the services to someone else unless I objected

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Consett26,

Once sent, you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number. Post back with this and I’ll check I've received it.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Social Media Comms

 

Vodafone UK

 

Thanks Lee. The reference is 7183820

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to them disputing the charges relating to early termination of the broadband on the basis that it was agreed that it was cancellable at any time.

I also asked again for a full statement of account and a recording of the call when I agreed to the contract.

 

I've now had their reply, which includes neither the statement of account nor the recording and only says this:

We provided details of your dispute to our client and have now received a

response from them which indicates that the debt details are correct.

 

 

We would very much like to discuss this matter with you further. Please can you telephone us,

within the next 7 days, on 0845

 

Obviously I'm not going to telephone them and I think I'll write to them again insisting that they supply the statement and recording to substantiate the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

In the end I ignored them and it went away. Today I had a text from CCS, which referred me to a letter on their website that tries to recover the same "debt" from me.

 

Is there anything I can do to get BT to engage with me and not just keep referring it to different debt collection agencies?

 

For now I’ve drafted the following response for CCS:

 

I have on numerous occasions in the past denied liability to BT for the amount that you claim and enclose copies of previous correspondence about the matter. You will see from the enclosures that the debt is clearly in dispute and no meaningful attempt has been made by either BT or their agents to investigate it.

 

Please be aware that I am familiar with the Consumer Credit sourcebook of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) which states the following rules.

 

"A firm must not ignore or disregard a customer's claim that a debt has been settled or is disputed and must not continue to make demands for payment without providing clear justification and/or evidence as to why the customer's claim is not valid." (rule 7.5.3)

 

"A firm must suspend any steps it takes or its agent takes in the recovery of a debt from a customer where the customer disputes the debt on valid grounds or what may be valid grounds." (rule 7.14.1)

 

"Where a customer disputes a debt on valid grounds or what may be valid grounds, the firm must investigate the dispute and provide details of the debt to the customer in a timely manner." (rule 7.14.3)

 

In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore, ignoring and/or disregarding claims that the debt is disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment would amount to physical/psychological harassment.

 

Please refer the matter back to BT so that they can provide the requested documentation to substantiate their claim.

Perhaps I should be a bit more assertive with BT directly? It's ultimately BT that's doing the harassing rather than their agents
Link to post
Share on other sites

is your credit file clean of this debt?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then pers I'd ignore them.

you don't need to start unnecessary letter tennis.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From an immediate credit perspective I agree, but if I ignore the various DCAs and BT then decide to write the "debt" off,

isn't there a risk that they'll mess my credit file up at that point?

 

 

If so its surely better to try and get it resolved now.

 

 

Besides, I'd like it sorted out just for my own peace of mind and its getting annoying that BT just keep farming it out to different DCAs

rather than addressing the concerns that I've raised

Link to post
Share on other sites

ceo bt then

or the regulator

 

 

why pussy futt with stupid powerless DCA's

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the account is settled end of

if the letters all say BT our client.

then its not been sold on as theres no debt

and its simply a database error on delinquent files.

 

 

have bt actually confirmed to you in writing the account is settled?

 

 

and you owe nowt?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...