Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3661 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Would a SAR to a bailiff company produce the paperwork regarding accounts they have collected on

 

Ie Statements of accounts and charges added etc?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can sar anyone you like

 

but i know you are entitled to a list without paying

and we use it often here.

 

but if it only applies to live cases i'm not sure...

"From:

My Name

My Address

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

Ref: Account No: 123456

Dear Sir

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were certificated (http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=bailiff)Image: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/autolinker/images/link3.gif at.

e - the date of the Certification.

This is not a Subject access request (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?552-Data-Protection)Image: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/autolinker/images/link3.gif under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

I require this information within 14 days.

Yours faithfully

Ripped off customer"

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that

 

I was thinking along the SAR route as it is an account that was settled at the time. As i have become more aware of their practices i believe there are alot of charges that should not have been added and i want them back.

 

I will try the letter first, failing that will send a SAR.

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tom

 

I dont have the relevant account number anymore, i had a receipt for payment but have no idea where i have placed it.

 

I emailed the council to see if they still have the reference number for the account. Yes it is just the one!

 

I was thinking SAR and wording it for all accounts you have dealt with and using the vehicle registration, due to me not having the specific account number.

 

They would still have a record on system wouldnt they with it been 2010?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for the advice, ill see if the council manage to give me the details then send a letter off.

 

Failing those things ill send a SAR

 

Thanks

 

James

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

They sent me the details without the need for a SAR which was good.

 

On the statement it details 2 attendance fee's which total £196.

 

The bailiff came to collect and i paid up at the time as i had the money and didnt want to gain any further fees. This was his first time at my property and he had not attended prior to place any levy.

 

Knowing what i do now i understand they have no right to charge these attendance fee's unless they had previously attended to levy and were returning to remove goods. I was not aware of that at the time.

 

I have written to them giving them the chance to refund the attendance fees due to them not been due under the regulations otherwise next will be a court claim and they can argue they correctly added the fee's to the courts.

 

Is this the best way to go about it? As am not letting up in the slightest with them just as they do not us when shoe is on the other foot.

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What exactly is a bailiff allowed to charge for two visits to your property when acting on a PCN where no levy has taken place.

 

Also where does it state these

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

They can charge for sending a letter: £11.20 (+ VAT if they are VAT registered)

 

The vist fees are: If the parking charges plus court costs are no more than £100 in total: £28.

If the parking charges plus court costs are more than £100 in total: 28% of the first £200 and 5.5% for any amount over £200.

 

They can charge for up to three visits (VAT can also be added to these charges).

 

The Enforcement of Road Traffic Debts (Certificated bailiffs)(Amended 2003) Regulations 1993

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty :-D

 

Just one more thing, if their first visit fee takes it over £100 can they then charge the 28% or does it relate to the initial charges only

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry but your question has reminded me that I was going to start a new sticky with copies of the fee scale.

 

The 28% applies to the amount of the PCN at warrant stage. I will post more details late today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tomtubby

 

So to be clear if the PCN is below £100 they can only charge £28 even if their additional charges take it over

 

James

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi

 

Am i right in working out if there is an outstanding parking ticket for £82 + Bailiff Letter of £11.20 totalling £93.20, then if a bailif makes a levy as the debt is below £100 the fee should be £28?

 

If so just trying to work out how the Equita bailiff that attended is claiming £288.84 in bailiff fee's?

 

Thanks for any help

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an initial visit too so minus the letter fee the rest is what i have been charged!!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi

 

Received an order for recovery today for a ticket back in 2012.

 

I have already been issued one of these for this PCN which was sent to bailiffs. As i refused to deal with bailiffs and only them the warrant ran its course and account returned to the council.

 

Now they have issued a further order recovery on a ticket that is 2 years old.

 

Is this standard practice? Can they just keep issuing these and sending it to a bailiff company?

 

Thanks in advance

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition i was under impression that a LA had to request the re-issue of a warrant within the 12 month period not let it expire then apply for another?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was not the same vehicle, they were looking for my old one and my current one is garaged.

 

That aside as I said above once a warrant has expired its expired 12 months, why did they not follow procedure and have it renewed instead they have let it expire and trying to get a new one issued.

 

Am sure they cannot get a new warrant issued for the same person and address am just looking for clarification on the law about this.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can in theory take a PCN through the process all over again, but my understanding is that they need to start again with a Notice to Owner, then Charge Certificate, then Order for Recovery and ultimately a warrant.

 

Have you tried speaking to the council and asking why you've received it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...