Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I need advice please, Back in November 2018 we parked at The Southgate McDonald’s/Starbucks car park at Stansted before getting our flight.I parked at Starbucks to walk to McDonald’s. I have received letters over the years and have never acknowledged any of them . I now have a CCJ against me as I didn’t think that it was real so never answered My latest letter from dcbl is a notice of debt recovery unpaid county court judgment of £347.92.I know I should have completed the CCJ.Is there anything that I can do now or should I just pay it.Thank you bingoboy
    • Hi BankFodder, Stu007 This is correct BankFodder. Thanks for all the info Stu007, very interesting reading Regards
    • Seems as if Germany has their own version of Boris🤣   ”I know that some of you are impatient with my posts about German politics, and particularly my repeated pieces on our retarded Health Minister. I get that this can seem like inside baseball, and that all of you suffer under the very similar idiocies of your own Covid politicians. But, I just can’t help myself. Lauterbach is a special case, a truly monumental idiot who in his boundless incompetence and stupidity vastly exceeds his peers. It is my aim to make him the international symbol of pandemic derangement. I want pictures of this human incarnation of everything that is wrong with masking children and force-vaccinating millions printed next to future dictionary entries on Covidianism. We have seen the enemy, and it is this sad, stupid, Smeagol-looking loser, who thinks Eric Feigl-Ding is an authority and that clip-on bowties are fashionable.”     German Media Realise Their Health Minister is an International Laughingstock – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG The German media are waking up to the fact that their mask-loving Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is an international...
    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
    • So I ask you –"when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion?" And you answer – "when I brought the policy" And then I ask you – "what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained" and you answer that it is probably a complete write-off    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Would a SAR to a bailiff company produce the paperwork regarding accounts they have collected on

 

Ie Statements of accounts and charges added etc?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can sar anyone you like

 

but i know you are entitled to a list without paying

and we use it often here.

 

but if it only applies to live cases i'm not sure...

"From:

My Name

My Address

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

Ref: Account No: 123456

Dear Sir

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were certificated (http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=bailiff)Image: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/autolinker/images/link3.gif at.

e - the date of the Certification.

This is not a Subject access request (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?552-Data-Protection)Image: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/autolinker/images/link3.gif under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

I require this information within 14 days.

Yours faithfully

Ripped off customer"

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that

 

I was thinking along the SAR route as it is an account that was settled at the time. As i have become more aware of their practices i believe there are alot of charges that should not have been added and i want them back.

 

I will try the letter first, failing that will send a SAR.

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tom

 

I dont have the relevant account number anymore, i had a receipt for payment but have no idea where i have placed it.

 

I emailed the council to see if they still have the reference number for the account. Yes it is just the one!

 

I was thinking SAR and wording it for all accounts you have dealt with and using the vehicle registration, due to me not having the specific account number.

 

They would still have a record on system wouldnt they with it been 2010?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for the advice, ill see if the council manage to give me the details then send a letter off.

 

Failing those things ill send a SAR

 

Thanks

 

James

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

They sent me the details without the need for a SAR which was good.

 

On the statement it details 2 attendance fee's which total £196.

 

The bailiff came to collect and i paid up at the time as i had the money and didnt want to gain any further fees. This was his first time at my property and he had not attended prior to place any levy.

 

Knowing what i do now i understand they have no right to charge these attendance fee's unless they had previously attended to levy and were returning to remove goods. I was not aware of that at the time.

 

I have written to them giving them the chance to refund the attendance fees due to them not been due under the regulations otherwise next will be a court claim and they can argue they correctly added the fee's to the courts.

 

Is this the best way to go about it? As am not letting up in the slightest with them just as they do not us when shoe is on the other foot.

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What exactly is a bailiff allowed to charge for two visits to your property when acting on a PCN where no levy has taken place.

 

Also where does it state these

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

They can charge for sending a letter: £11.20 (+ VAT if they are VAT registered)

 

The vist fees are: If the parking charges plus court costs are no more than £100 in total: £28.

If the parking charges plus court costs are more than £100 in total: 28% of the first £200 and 5.5% for any amount over £200.

 

They can charge for up to three visits (VAT can also be added to these charges).

 

The Enforcement of Road Traffic Debts (Certificated bailiffs)(Amended 2003) Regulations 1993

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty :-D

 

Just one more thing, if their first visit fee takes it over £100 can they then charge the 28% or does it relate to the initial charges only

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry but your question has reminded me that I was going to start a new sticky with copies of the fee scale.

 

The 28% applies to the amount of the PCN at warrant stage. I will post more details late today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tomtubby

 

So to be clear if the PCN is below £100 they can only charge £28 even if their additional charges take it over

 

James

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi

 

Am i right in working out if there is an outstanding parking ticket for £82 + Bailiff Letter of £11.20 totalling £93.20, then if a bailif makes a levy as the debt is below £100 the fee should be £28?

 

If so just trying to work out how the Equita bailiff that attended is claiming £288.84 in bailiff fee's?

 

Thanks for any help

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an initial visit too so minus the letter fee the rest is what i have been charged!!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi

 

Received an order for recovery today for a ticket back in 2012.

 

I have already been issued one of these for this PCN which was sent to bailiffs. As i refused to deal with bailiffs and only them the warrant ran its course and account returned to the council.

 

Now they have issued a further order recovery on a ticket that is 2 years old.

 

Is this standard practice? Can they just keep issuing these and sending it to a bailiff company?

 

Thanks in advance

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition i was under impression that a LA had to request the re-issue of a warrant within the 12 month period not let it expire then apply for another?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was not the same vehicle, they were looking for my old one and my current one is garaged.

 

That aside as I said above once a warrant has expired its expired 12 months, why did they not follow procedure and have it renewed instead they have let it expire and trying to get a new one issued.

 

Am sure they cannot get a new warrant issued for the same person and address am just looking for clarification on the law about this.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can in theory take a PCN through the process all over again, but my understanding is that they need to start again with a Notice to Owner, then Charge Certificate, then Order for Recovery and ultimately a warrant.

 

Have you tried speaking to the council and asking why you've received it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...