Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Go Debt old private & commercial finance 'debt' car finance Claim Issued


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think it will be a bonus for this to get in court.

 

 

as soon as the judge ses what has actually gone on

 

 

I think he'll null/void the agreement and make them give YOU all the payments back.

 

 

 

 

what do you think theoldrouge?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 265
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

how does he know what a court will decide?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if were my acc , I would relish it going to court given the facts

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose it would be good, it's just a little daunting when we have never dealt with these things before and have never appeared in court whatsoever. We know what has gone on and we are confident of putting our case across but we're just unsure on the whole legislation side of things.

 

Would we need a solicitor to go to court, we don't really want tha legal costs stacking up. Do you think go debt are pushing for a settlement again because they are worried? If they are worried, why would they even pursue a CCJ? It's all very daunting and confusing at times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yu would not need a sols no.

 

 

to be honest.

 

 

this could be quite easy for you

 

 

and

 

 

with the fact that you did not and could not

of signed the repo form

 

 

me thinks on that alone its a done deal.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose it would be good, it's just a little daunting when we have never dealt with these things before and have never appeared in court whatsoever. We know what has gone on and we are confident of putting our case across but we're just unsure on the whole legislation side of things.

 

Would we need a solicitor to go to court, we don't really want tha legal costs stacking up. Do you think go debt are pushing for a settlement again because they are worried? If they are worried, why would they even pursue a CCJ? It's all very daunting and confusing at times.

 

county court claims are like a game of poker

 

a case of who folds first

 

youve got a very good hand

 

read up, hold your nerve

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

now you have received the claim you are going to have to adhere to the court timeline and deal with it.

 

although we already know most of the details,

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-April-2014**

please read and answer the above as it will help with advice on the legal side of things

 

will move thread to financial legal issues now claim has been issued

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing we have noticed and we are unsure whether we should raise this now or not,

 

 

but we received an email from go debt stating

 

 

"our records confirm the agreement terminated due to non payment and the vehicle was subsequently repossessed"

 

 

isn't this directly saying they didn't have a voluntary surrender?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? go debt limited

 

Date of issue – Claim form stamped 29th July 2014.

 

 

On the letter from the solicitors it states

"Please note that the claim form and particulars of claim are deemed to be served on 29 October 2014.

You should therefore respond to County Court Money Claims Centre on or before 12 November 2014.

Should you wish to discuss settlement of this claim, please contact us on the direct line below"

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

the particulars section of the claim is attached to this post.

 

 

What is the value of the claim? £6683.11

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Car finance

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? May 2007

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

 

Debt purchaser; Go Debt LTD

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

 

Didnt receive a notice of assignment, the first we heard of it was when we received a letter threatening court action

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

Why did you cease payments:- The car was repossessed and I thought that was the end of the matter

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementlink3.gif plan?

 

I advised the original creditor of financial detrement following an accident in which my leg was broken, and my mother made payments for me as i could no longer afford to.

What you need to do now.

 

Answer the questions above

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA1974 Section 77/78/79 request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement

(except for overdraftlink3.gif/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts

 

Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards

 

Request 2 - Current accounts

 

You may use a CPR part 18link3.gif request for any other information (not request documents) that you might require in order to defend yourself.

Please not that CPR 18 is specifically for Fast Track claims and although technically the claim has yet to be allocated to a track the claimant may refuse to comply for this reason.

 

If you require CPR Part 18 - this will need to be drafted specifically.

 

If you are not planning on defending for one reason or another – then you will need to complete an Income and Expenditure form and contact the Solicitor with your proposal. The N9a is already enclosed in the claim pack for Admittance which should be sent to the solicitor named on the claim form

 

If you are considering making a partial admittance N9b must be completed and returned to the court.

Please note in most cases a partial admittance will result in an automatic CCJ for the amount admitted

 

 

 

See above for the completed form which was referred to; I am a little confused as to the bottom of the form in which I need to send a CPR 18? Thanks.

 

A couple of side notes;

 

 

l this laim makes reference to the default notice,

and encloses a copy,

 

 

however this is the first we have seen of it and this was nt in the original SARS.

 

 

Also, some of the figures just dont make sense;

 

 

on the transcript of the calls it states,

 

 

for example, £200 was paid,

 

 

but on the payment schedule only £119.58 is credited?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Furthermore, on all my agreements (the original) on the default notice and on the PC things,

 

 

it states that my total amount payable was £6,889.84.

 

 

however on the claim form it states (section 4) total amount payable under the agreement was £6,189.84; however this is incorrect?

 

Also, on the default notice it states the total amount payment is £6,889.84,

states the total amount paid up to date is £2,724.12,

 

 

which would leave £4165.72 left owing.

 

 

However Go Debt are asking for £4,182.11.

 

 

It looks to me that on the claim form they have all their figures mixed up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please pdf the pix

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure of the claim date Tiny??

 

Has it been Court stamped? When did you receive it?

 

The debt would've become statute barred on the 30th July so they sent for a ccj on that date and then they had 3 months to serve the claim to my partner; something the FOS have confirmed is fine as they were "protecting their position".

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 161 is not a claimform.

 

 

that comes direct from the court not the sols.

 

 

is something fishy going on here?

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they issued a claim in july and you got nowt from the court in july nor before?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received one of the following Tiny ?.........

 

http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n001-eng.pdf

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they issued a claim in july and you got nowt from the court in july nor before?

 

They said that they put the claim forward to stop the statute barred and agreed to hold it until the FOS made a decision, once that was made they sent it through to us. We contacted the county court and they confirmed that this is fine to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...