Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What happens if debtor has no money to pay back


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI,

I received `judgement by default` from a county court for money Mr AW owes me.

 

The amount is less than £500 and judgement was issued 2 month ago.

Now, I am proceeding to obtain information regarding the financial situation of this debtor by N316.

 

The question is what I can do further after N316.

 

I am quite sure that N316 will not provide much information.

The debtor is an English man in his mid-40s who was born and lives in London, never worked, has been depending on benefits all through his life, have 3 kids living in Birmingham, has been declared bankrupt (intentional bankruptcy to earn money from a bank), gaining daily maintenance money by conning people such as disabled people and women, no bank accounts, no property or assets apart from some assets hidden (from authority)in West-india.

 

The debtor most likely changed his address since he received the initial court order.

Is there any way to obtain his latest address from Department of Work and Pensions or Housing benefit office?

EX321 suggests that :

• a warrant of execution;

• an attachment of earnings order;

• a third party debt order; or

• a charging order.

 

Due to above reason, only `a warrant of execution` would be an available option.

It only works if the person actually lives in the address.

Due to safety, I try to avoid direct contact with the debtor unless being supervised.

I will use county court enforcement agent and possible other means to avoid direct contact: all contacts have so far been made through telephone and emails.

 

It would be much appreciated if anyone could advise me.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dave and welcome to CAG

 

And there lies your problem ...not much else you can do...you cant get blood out of a stone....unfortunately.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a debt of less than £500, is it worth spending money on trying to enforce this debt ?

 

This person will have the CCJ on their record for 6 years and it may cause them problems. e.g getting services, credit, bank accounts, jobs. Perhaps at some point they may look to settle the debt.

 

Based on the information in you post, I think that this person may not be bothered by a CCJ and will not respond to any approach for them to attend the court to provide information. For a small debt and the CCJ only being recent, I am not sure a court would sanction such a move, as holding your debtor in contempt of court for not attending any hearing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier,

It is apprx £200.

Not much but I need it as I am currently unable to work due to spine problem.

 

Regards

 

If you know this person is on benefits, I wonder whether as the claimant, you can ask the court to make an attachment to earnings order and the court then writes to DWP to arrange. DWP then check benefits and if they find a record, they deduct a percentage, which is paid via the court to yourself.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know this person is on benefits, I wonder whether as the claimant, you can ask the court to make an attachment to earnings order and the court then writes to DWP to arrange. DWP then check benefits and if they find a record, they deduct a percentage, which is paid via the court to yourself.

 

I think that only applies to DWP overpayments and Crown debts UB.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send bailiffs to make enquiries but unless he has assets it will be a wasted trip and you'll still be stung for the fee. For the sake of £200 it probably isn't worth it, unfortunately.

 

 

Not sure what you mean by 'maintenance money'. If that is going into a bank account you can try for a third party debt order over the account, but you'd have to identify the bank where the account is held first.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send bailiffs to make enquiries but unless he has assets it will be a wasted trip and you'll still be stung for the fee. For the sake of £200 it probably isn't worth it, unfortunately.

 

 

Not sure what you mean by 'maintenance money'. If that is going into a bank account you can try for a third party debt order over the account, but you'd have to identify the bank where the account is held first.

 

Hi,

Thank you for your advice.

I have been preparing for sending bailiffs, but thought he might have relocated. In this case, as you say, it is waste of money to send bailiffs. Therefore, I am making inquiry here to check the address. The`maintenance money` is money he needs for food, drinks, socializing etc.. It is cash and he is not allowed to set up a bank account.

Appreciate your comment anyway.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by unclebulgaria67

If you know this person is on benefits, I wonder whether as the claimant, you can ask the court to make an attachment to earnings order and the court then writes to DWP to arrange. DWP then check benefits and if they find a record, they deduct a percentage, which is paid via the court to yourself.

 

 

I think that only applies to DWP overpayments and Crown debts UB.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Hi,

Thanks UncleBul and Andy, I will research the possibility of deduction from benefits just in case.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Legal Issues.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for any similar situation, you should monitor the debtor's circunstances to keep an eye on its financial situation.

Even if your debtor has the profile of someone who would not bother, or perhaps not immediately, there is always a way to recover your money. Some will say it is a low debt, some will say that when the debtor doesn't seem wealthy 200 is easier to recover than 2000.

Remember that you got your judgment recently. Even if it is generally better to move to enforcement within the next months after the judgement, you have 6 years to start enforcement steps. You might notice a change of situation in the debtor in 2 years and then be able to action one of the enforcement options.

Right now it is pointless to apply for an AEO as it won't be accepted for someone on employment benefits. It doesn't mean that the debtor will not get a job later.

A third party debt order can also be considered if you know that the debtor is likely to receive money.

 

You can obtain the latest address / check residency of someone by using a tracing service.

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...