Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite usual for couriers to swap parcel contents, though it could have been done by someone at the 1st address before it got to where it should have .... ebay. just to clarify as you seem to be not understanding/reading some posts correctly.   you should always ignore a dca totally unless you ever get a letter of claim in the post. you never ever ring a DCA.. they LIE. no!! no!! they dont own the debt, their txt says our client ebay. only the OWNER of a debt can take you to court. and ebay dont do court. i find it quite amazing that you have numerous threads about ebay/paypal regarding issues since you joined in 2011 but have never read any of the advice previously given. dx    
    • so where are the one with this HMTL link? and when were they sent.? pdf's merged and properly named. dx  
    • Hi Just had a wee look at your PDF and nothing really to add. Now as for the Court Fees if these are in there Claim then that is for the Judge to decide whether they accept the recovery of Court Fees in the Claim. If recovery of Court Fees are not in the Claim and they try to recover these via your deposit then you dispute this with the Tenancy deposit scheme your deposit is protected in and point out these costs should have been in there Court Claim which they failed to do and is there error.  
    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

East Midlands Trains - Fare Evasion? Prosecution?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3656 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm looking for some advice on a problem that has affected me. I'll begin from the start.

 

I ordered a Stagecoach Smartcard (part of EMT so i gather) so i could commute to school (I'm 16) by Train.

 

I went to use it as i went to my volunteer position on a Heritage Railway,

I thought it worked like a trentbarton MANGO card, I scanned it on and the scanner bleeped at me

so i thought i'd recieve a bill through the post or something (first time using one).

 

I got on my train and as the Ticket Inspector walked down

i explained what i had done and asked her if it was OK,

she later turned out to be a Revenue Protection Officer for EMT.

She took my card and said that the card was only for season tickets but took it and phoned the card place.

 

She said there was no ticket on the card so i offered to pay for a paper one,

she refused and said it's too late.

 

She then got me off the train at Derby Station (I started at Long Eaton, commuting to Belper)

and took me to the front desk.

 

I asked her if i could use a phone to call my parent and she said she'd check my details

and be a few minutes then i could.

 

I gave her my details and version of events in full.

I got my phone out (with no credit) to get my parent's number out

and she said i couldn't use her phone because i had one, she said that i had a phone

and im trying to waste her time.

 

She even threatened to call the police and my volunteer work and 'see what they thought of it'

in the end she said she'd be reporting it and i'd get a letter in the post to take me to court.

 

I made her fully aware i was 16 and asked her for ID so i could write down her name,

She flashed her name badge (pinned onto her shirt) at me and shouted

'I'm ****** and i'm a REVENUE PROTECTION OFFICER!' (Don't know if i'm allowed to post names).

 

Afterwards when i got to my volunteers position (late) and spoke to two volunteers

(One a Magistrate and one a former Police Officer) and

 

they said what she did was out of order and they probably wouldn't do anything

because of her behaviour (shouting, refusing me access to a phone,

questioning me without a responsible adult, not showing me a badge of authority

or cautioning me and apparently anything i said to her was inadmissible in court).

 

Any advice? I'm still waiting on the letter.

 

Thanks,

Alphoria

Edited by Alphoria
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alphoria

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Write a Formal Letter of Complaint, mark it as such. Explain what's happened (misunderstanding how card worked), how they have let you down (the Revenue Inspector being rude and unhelpful, tell him what she said, explain that she didn't allow you to explain what happened) and what you want them to do. Run the letter pass your parents.

 

Send it to:-

 

Mr David Horne

Managing Director

East Midlands Trains

[email protected]

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alphoria

 

How old are you at the moment? 16?

Well If you are, im not sure if your parents would have to deal with this for you.

 

However Rebel has it right, contact the MD and say exactly what has happened and then go from there. Im pretty sure EMT are a bit better than other operators.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have spoken to the General Manager of the Heritage Railway of which i volunteer and he is confident they won't proceed after he emailed them advising them not to.

 

Thanks for the help anyway.

Well, apart from the person who came in throwing accusations.

 

Otherwise, if you live in Derbyshire enjoy the sun.

 

But once again, Thank you all very much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please read this in the spirit that it is intended.

 

I doubt that the general manager of a Heritage Railway will have any say in the matter and this also goes for the advice of other volunteers. It will be up to the TOC to decide what, if any action they take, but they may consider any mitigation put to them before coming to their decision.

 

Now I also hope that this isn't pursued further if all happened exactly as you say, but a fare is due and the rail company are entitled to pursue that if they wish to do so. The matter of staff behaviour and any complaint concerning that is an entirely separate issue and should be pursued as such.

 

As you are only 16 a prosecution is extremely unlikely, TOCs do not normally proceed to Youth Courts unless the matter is very serious and this certainly does not fall into that category.

 

If you get a letter from East Midland Trains, come back and let us know what it says.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Error in referring to wrong TOC
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get a letter from London Midland, come back and let us know what it says.

 

Didnt know LM and EMT were one and the same ^__^

 

But yes, its very unlikely they will proceed to prosecute.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My previous post edited to reflect my error in referring to wrong TOC. Thanks to fkofilee for noticing.

 

 

content unchanged otherwise

 

Quite frankly I'm relieved! I've larnt a great deal from OCJ's post, and consider them authoratative, but have always wondered .....

At last, proof that OCJ can in fact make mistakes (albeit minor admin ones!), so proof that they aren't an AI machine, and are human :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't quite know how it works but it seems to have done. I'm now travelling happy with trentbarton rather than East Mids Trains. If i do get a letter i will come back and let you know though!

 

And i'm more than happy to pay the fare or even a £20 penalty fare, I was just really worried about the 'court scare' they gave me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Looks like i've had to come back and grovel and say you may be right. I recieved a letter from their 'Prosecution Dept' yesterday, they have invited me to an appointment on Tuesday, what do i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like i've had to come back and grovel and say you may be right. I recieved a letter from their 'Prosecution Dept' yesterday, they have invited me to an appointment on Tuesday, what do i do?

 

Your original post notes you told the RP staff member you were 16.

You haven't turned 17 in the interim?

 

Does the letter make any reference to your age, or to having an "appropriate adult" with you?.

 

Do you have a passport or other official document showing your age?

 

The reason I am asking is that if you are still a juvenile, I'd be surprised if they knew that and wanted to interview you without an 'appropriate adult' present.

The interview then certainly couldn't proceed under PACE guidelines.

 

You could consider attending, "dressing down" (school uniform, no make up) and saying : "I've told my parents I'm coming here, they weren't sure if they needed to come with me, as like I told the lady on the train : I'm only 16.

Your letter didn't say anything about bringing my parents, though"

"I made a mistake, and offered to pay on the train as I admitted my mistake"

 

If they then ask you again about your age, show them whatever proof you have. If they mention the on train staff not noting your age, remind them that you did tell her your age, and ask to be able to call your parents from the station, but weren't allowed to.

 

I suspect that will derail proceedings.

(BTW, you have told your parents? and are you meant to be in school / college on Tuesday?)

 

As OCJ noted, it would be very unusual for court proceedings to follow for a juvenile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your original post notes you told the RP staff member you were 16.

You haven't turned 17 in the interim?

 

Does the letter make any reference to your age, or to having an "appropriate adult" with you?.

 

Do you have a passport or other official document showing your age?

 

The reason I am asking is that if you are still a juvenile, I'd be surprised if they knew that and wanted to interview you without an 'appropriate adult' present.

The interview then certainly couldn't proceed under PACE guidelines.

 

You could consider attending, "dressing down" (school uniform, no make up) and saying : "I've told my parents I'm coming here, they weren't sure if they needed to come with me, as like I told the lady on the train : I'm only 16.

Your letter didn't say anything about bringing my parents, though"

"I made a mistake, and offered to pay on the train as I admitted my mistake"

 

If they then ask you again about your age, show them whatever proof you have. If they mention the on train staff not noting your age, remind them that you did tell her your age, and ask to be able to call your parents from the station, but weren't allowed to.

 

I suspect that will derail proceedings.

(BTW, you have told your parents? and are you meant to be in school / college on Tuesday?)

 

As OCJ noted, it would be very unusual for court proceedings to follow for a juvenile.

 

They do want me to take a responsible and I'm still 16.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do want me to take a responsible and I'm still 16.

 

Take a responsible adult, and DON'T mention any negative aspects of the member of train staff ; the time to complain about HER is after YOUR case is resolved.

 

Say what you've said here. No need to change it, especially if it is what you told the on-train staff member. You didn't have a valid ticket, but only by an error : explain how you came to make the error you made. Offer apologies for your error, stress that then and now you were and are willing to pay your fare, and that you are sorry that trouble has been caused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice and I did exactly what you said and the man was very reasonable. He said the usual fine would be £280+ original fare but they would charge me £75 for my stupidity.

 

So overall a £75 fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...