Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can be sure that pardoning himself, stopping the other prosecutions and vengeance will be his first priorities if he wins. i dont think he will win, but no surety on that
    • The other cases aren't going to happen before November though, are they? Reporters are saying he can't pardon himself for a state conviction. He would have to lean on the governor of New York state, as I understand it.
    • I am requesting your assistance to how I should go about a serious breach of my privacy that occurred during my stay at one of IHG’s hotel on Ma 2023. Having previously had items taken from my hotel room elsewhere I take the added precaution of using a security camera app on my device whenever I stay in a hotel room. The recordings are date and time stamped and it cannot be adjusted by the end user.   On this particular occasion I discovered evidence from my personal security camera recordings of a spy camera had been placed underneath my door, and can be seen moving along the base of the door for approximately 15 seconds.   The spy camera is in fact marketed as an inspection device of drains primarily but is known to be used in observing spaces difficult to enter. It is a usb endoscopic camera that has a length flexible cable that is semi rigid and can negotiate any obstruction by bending. The operator can be up to 3-4 metres away.   Infuriated as I had previously stayed with them in 2022 for 3 months at £260 per night that they would seek to question my honesty and invade my privacy. I immediately called reception and asked why they would do such a thing and if they had any concerns they were welcome to inspect my room and go through my personal belongings and ask me anything they wanted to. I was sleeping for the best part of my stay and was alone throughout.   I sent the recordings to the receptionist within the hour of finding them and I asked to speak to the manager of the hotel who I was told wasn’t present. I tried to have face to face meetings with him but he instead wrote to me denying the recordings were made at their hotel stating that they didn’t observe anyone in the corridor at the time of the recordings and that they don’t have a metal bar at the interface of the tile and carpet which corresponds to the overlying door. I rejected that statement on the grounds the video doesn’t show a bar but a reflection of light on the tile and you wouldn’t see a person outside my door because the cable is black and runs along the floor. If you don’t look for this you won’t see it. The matter was passed up to the area manager and he also denied the allegation. This is where the matter ends as far as IHG are concerned. Leading a busy work and family life I let the matter go but I found myself back at the same hotel a year later. I booked for  2 nights and was given a room facing the lobby door that led to the lifts. Unfortunately, from the hours of 3am I was woken up by the noise of the door opening and closing but also noticed shadows of a person standing in front of my door. At first I took no notice and put this down to a guest waiting for someone but the person or persons returned several times, standing outside my door for up to several minutes. I called the hotel reception and asked if there was an issue  on my floor and they said they would come up to check. They never said they would check the CCTV and as the incidents continued to happen up to 8am I called them 6 times. Given my past experience I didn’t think they took security as serious a# her establishments and made them observe the Cctv and let me know. The explanation I was given was that they could see residents there but they were heading down to breakfast. The time that I had noticed these feet by door was from 3am and breakfast started at 6.30am. It also didn’t explain why they would stand by my door for anything longer than 10seconds and if they were waiting for someone how likely is it that this scenario is played out 6 times when there was only 12 rooms per floor. Later that morning when I went down for breakfast the manager said he would move me to a room at the end of the corridor and asked me what my plans were for the day, essentially when would I be in the hotel. I stated that for the day I was out. He then said that all his staff were uncomfortable about me being a guest and said that I was not welcome there anymore. I had paid for the two nights but when it came to the end of the day I didn’t feel that I would be able to rest at the hotel given the hostility so I returned the next day to collect my remaining belongings, namely items of clothing, an iPhone charging cable and plug, and toiletries. Checkout was at 2pm and I was at the hotel at 3pm. All my belongings were gone and they couldn’t locate the items.  I plan to report the incident of the spy camera to the police, as well as the theft, and write to the hotel emphasising that this breach of privacy is unacceptable and the hotel's failure to properly investigate and address the issue is deeply concerning. The fact that I requested security checks to ensure my safety in the early hours was reasonable, yet their response to ban from the premises was excessive and even possibly discriminatory as I had revealed to them that I had been a victim of a hate crime given my sexuality. . I am seeking compensation for the infringement of my privacy, the lack of proper investigation, and the being humiliated and made to feel like an undesirable. I will request a full refund of my two-night stay totaling £390. Additionally, I will request compensation for the cost of my previous stay when the infringement occurred, which was £220. I am also considering damages for the infringement of my privacy but at a loss as to what this would equate to. I will close the letter giving them a 14 day timeframe to respond.    Is there anything you feel i need to consider here? Many thanks   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

East Midlands Trains - Fare Evasion? Prosecution?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm looking for some advice on a problem that has affected me. I'll begin from the start.

 

I ordered a Stagecoach Smartcard (part of EMT so i gather) so i could commute to school (I'm 16) by Train.

 

I went to use it as i went to my volunteer position on a Heritage Railway,

I thought it worked like a trentbarton MANGO card, I scanned it on and the scanner bleeped at me

so i thought i'd recieve a bill through the post or something (first time using one).

 

I got on my train and as the Ticket Inspector walked down

i explained what i had done and asked her if it was OK,

she later turned out to be a Revenue Protection Officer for EMT.

She took my card and said that the card was only for season tickets but took it and phoned the card place.

 

She said there was no ticket on the card so i offered to pay for a paper one,

she refused and said it's too late.

 

She then got me off the train at Derby Station (I started at Long Eaton, commuting to Belper)

and took me to the front desk.

 

I asked her if i could use a phone to call my parent and she said she'd check my details

and be a few minutes then i could.

 

I gave her my details and version of events in full.

I got my phone out (with no credit) to get my parent's number out

and she said i couldn't use her phone because i had one, she said that i had a phone

and im trying to waste her time.

 

She even threatened to call the police and my volunteer work and 'see what they thought of it'

in the end she said she'd be reporting it and i'd get a letter in the post to take me to court.

 

I made her fully aware i was 16 and asked her for ID so i could write down her name,

She flashed her name badge (pinned onto her shirt) at me and shouted

'I'm ****** and i'm a REVENUE PROTECTION OFFICER!' (Don't know if i'm allowed to post names).

 

Afterwards when i got to my volunteers position (late) and spoke to two volunteers

(One a Magistrate and one a former Police Officer) and

 

they said what she did was out of order and they probably wouldn't do anything

because of her behaviour (shouting, refusing me access to a phone,

questioning me without a responsible adult, not showing me a badge of authority

or cautioning me and apparently anything i said to her was inadmissible in court).

 

Any advice? I'm still waiting on the letter.

 

Thanks,

Alphoria

Edited by Alphoria
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alphoria

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Write a Formal Letter of Complaint, mark it as such. Explain what's happened (misunderstanding how card worked), how they have let you down (the Revenue Inspector being rude and unhelpful, tell him what she said, explain that she didn't allow you to explain what happened) and what you want them to do. Run the letter pass your parents.

 

Send it to:-

 

Mr David Horne

Managing Director

East Midlands Trains

[email protected]

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alphoria

 

How old are you at the moment? 16?

Well If you are, im not sure if your parents would have to deal with this for you.

 

However Rebel has it right, contact the MD and say exactly what has happened and then go from there. Im pretty sure EMT are a bit better than other operators.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have spoken to the General Manager of the Heritage Railway of which i volunteer and he is confident they won't proceed after he emailed them advising them not to.

 

Thanks for the help anyway.

Well, apart from the person who came in throwing accusations.

 

Otherwise, if you live in Derbyshire enjoy the sun.

 

But once again, Thank you all very much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please read this in the spirit that it is intended.

 

I doubt that the general manager of a Heritage Railway will have any say in the matter and this also goes for the advice of other volunteers. It will be up to the TOC to decide what, if any action they take, but they may consider any mitigation put to them before coming to their decision.

 

Now I also hope that this isn't pursued further if all happened exactly as you say, but a fare is due and the rail company are entitled to pursue that if they wish to do so. The matter of staff behaviour and any complaint concerning that is an entirely separate issue and should be pursued as such.

 

As you are only 16 a prosecution is extremely unlikely, TOCs do not normally proceed to Youth Courts unless the matter is very serious and this certainly does not fall into that category.

 

If you get a letter from East Midland Trains, come back and let us know what it says.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Error in referring to wrong TOC
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get a letter from London Midland, come back and let us know what it says.

 

Didnt know LM and EMT were one and the same ^__^

 

But yes, its very unlikely they will proceed to prosecute.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My previous post edited to reflect my error in referring to wrong TOC. Thanks to fkofilee for noticing.

 

 

content unchanged otherwise

 

Quite frankly I'm relieved! I've larnt a great deal from OCJ's post, and consider them authoratative, but have always wondered .....

At last, proof that OCJ can in fact make mistakes (albeit minor admin ones!), so proof that they aren't an AI machine, and are human :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't quite know how it works but it seems to have done. I'm now travelling happy with trentbarton rather than East Mids Trains. If i do get a letter i will come back and let you know though!

 

And i'm more than happy to pay the fare or even a £20 penalty fare, I was just really worried about the 'court scare' they gave me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Looks like i've had to come back and grovel and say you may be right. I recieved a letter from their 'Prosecution Dept' yesterday, they have invited me to an appointment on Tuesday, what do i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like i've had to come back and grovel and say you may be right. I recieved a letter from their 'Prosecution Dept' yesterday, they have invited me to an appointment on Tuesday, what do i do?

 

Your original post notes you told the RP staff member you were 16.

You haven't turned 17 in the interim?

 

Does the letter make any reference to your age, or to having an "appropriate adult" with you?.

 

Do you have a passport or other official document showing your age?

 

The reason I am asking is that if you are still a juvenile, I'd be surprised if they knew that and wanted to interview you without an 'appropriate adult' present.

The interview then certainly couldn't proceed under PACE guidelines.

 

You could consider attending, "dressing down" (school uniform, no make up) and saying : "I've told my parents I'm coming here, they weren't sure if they needed to come with me, as like I told the lady on the train : I'm only 16.

Your letter didn't say anything about bringing my parents, though"

"I made a mistake, and offered to pay on the train as I admitted my mistake"

 

If they then ask you again about your age, show them whatever proof you have. If they mention the on train staff not noting your age, remind them that you did tell her your age, and ask to be able to call your parents from the station, but weren't allowed to.

 

I suspect that will derail proceedings.

(BTW, you have told your parents? and are you meant to be in school / college on Tuesday?)

 

As OCJ noted, it would be very unusual for court proceedings to follow for a juvenile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your original post notes you told the RP staff member you were 16.

You haven't turned 17 in the interim?

 

Does the letter make any reference to your age, or to having an "appropriate adult" with you?.

 

Do you have a passport or other official document showing your age?

 

The reason I am asking is that if you are still a juvenile, I'd be surprised if they knew that and wanted to interview you without an 'appropriate adult' present.

The interview then certainly couldn't proceed under PACE guidelines.

 

You could consider attending, "dressing down" (school uniform, no make up) and saying : "I've told my parents I'm coming here, they weren't sure if they needed to come with me, as like I told the lady on the train : I'm only 16.

Your letter didn't say anything about bringing my parents, though"

"I made a mistake, and offered to pay on the train as I admitted my mistake"

 

If they then ask you again about your age, show them whatever proof you have. If they mention the on train staff not noting your age, remind them that you did tell her your age, and ask to be able to call your parents from the station, but weren't allowed to.

 

I suspect that will derail proceedings.

(BTW, you have told your parents? and are you meant to be in school / college on Tuesday?)

 

As OCJ noted, it would be very unusual for court proceedings to follow for a juvenile.

 

They do want me to take a responsible and I'm still 16.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do want me to take a responsible and I'm still 16.

 

Take a responsible adult, and DON'T mention any negative aspects of the member of train staff ; the time to complain about HER is after YOUR case is resolved.

 

Say what you've said here. No need to change it, especially if it is what you told the on-train staff member. You didn't have a valid ticket, but only by an error : explain how you came to make the error you made. Offer apologies for your error, stress that then and now you were and are willing to pay your fare, and that you are sorry that trouble has been caused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice and I did exactly what you said and the man was very reasonable. He said the usual fine would be £280+ original fare but they would charge me £75 for my stupidity.

 

So overall a £75 fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...