Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jobcentre plus makes a mistake - what do I do? **Success**


zuzanka23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I was wondering if you could help me.

My sister is a single mother to a child who is 1,5 years old.

She started claiming Income Support while working 10 hours a week.

She increased her hours and has been working for 15 hours a week since September 2013. She went to JCP in September for an appointment and informed the adviser that she was now working 15 hours a week. Her Income Support stayed the same I think.

Now she had another appointment in January 2014. I went with her. She spoke to the advisor and said she is working 15 hours a week. The adviser said she is still entitled to Income support and even did a calculator to show her how much she would be better off if she was working 16 hours a week - increased her working hours by 1 hour. The adviser was aware of how many hours she is working. We talked about this at least for 30 minutes there.

Then she was asked by JCP to post her wage slips. This was February I think.

She posted her wage slips.

Then few days ago (April 2014) she received a letter saying they over payed her since January 2014 and she has to pay Income support back.

She is a single mother with a baby and can't afford to pay this back.

My question is, whose fault is this, she reported how many hours she works and enquired if she is entitled to Income support, she was told for quite a long time that she is entitled. Now they want it back. She can't afford to pay £1000 or more back now when she's lost income support as well.

I always thought if it's JCP mistake then she shouldn't have to pay it back. She never withhold any information so how come they didn't calculate it months ago, instead of waiting for months and now wanting all the money back?

can someone please help me and advice me on what to do?

I am quite upset as JCP just make mistakes so much and people who end up with no money have to pay them back when they are supposed to help people in difficult situations, instead they make their situation worse.

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

First things first she needs to fill out a GL24 form to dispute this decision, it is common practice for JCP/DWP et al to make admin errors,

and although they changed the rules so that any admin errors on their part were still recoverable, I have successfully argued this point

on more than one occasion and they have absorbed their ''admin error''.

 

Keep everything in writing, keep a diary of events, you must get a paper trail of evidence, if you send them anything, even if you use their own letters, again you must get ''proof of posting'' which is free from the PO counter, or they'll deny receiving it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for your reply.

I am going to help her do that, we will dispute their decision and we will appeal as I do not agree with the fact that they only just decided she is not entitled to it. We have got the paperwork the adviser gave her in January so we can dispute it, because the adviser knew she was working 15 hours a week.

Unfortunately everything was done at interviews so it might be word against a word but we will still try and appeal.

Thank you

If there is anything else I need to know, please let me know.

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the form... https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gl24-if-you-think-our-decision-is-wrong

 

Don't worry so much about the he said she said, argument, especially if it was done in the JC.

 

Right now maintain written evidence and proof of posting.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son had been receiving the over 25 rate of JSA, although he's only 18, he told them numourous times he didn't think it was correct, eventually after 2 months, they realised their mistake and said exactly that, it was our error, so he doesn't need to pay it back.

 

Is it possible that the JC advisor meant for your sister to make a claim for working tax credits and come off Income support, seems likely given the fact she mentioned increasing the hours by one up to 16 which is the requirement to claim WTC I believe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First things first she needs to fill out a GL24 form to dispute this decision, it is common practice for JCP/DWP et al to make admin errors,

and although they changed the rules so that any admin errors on their part were still recoverable, I have successfully argued this point

on more than one occasion and they have absorbed their ''admin error''.

 

Keep everything in writing, keep a diary of events, you must get a paper trail of evidence, if you send them anything, even if you use their own letters, again you must get ''proof of posting'' which is free from the PO counter, or they'll deny receiving it.

 

Only one minor correction here - form GL24 is no longer used. In order to challenge a decision (including an overpayment decision) you must first ask for a reconsideration and wait until that is complete before it's possible to appeal to a Tribunal. There isn't a form for this - easiest way is to write a letter stating that it is a reconsideration request and explaining which decision you are challenging and why you think it is wrong.

 

It does sound like there's at least a possible case for official error here.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:zuzanka23:

 

Claimants have to ask Jobcentreplus for 'the decision to be looked at again' before it can be appealed to the Tribunals Service. The process is known as mandatory reconsideration, and a written request via recorded delivery is best cos Jobcentreplus often 'lose' phone calls.

 

https://www.gov.uk/appeal-benefit/decisions-made-on-after-28-october-2013

 

Some info about recovery of overpayments;

 

http://www.turn2us.org.uk/default.aspx?page=21248

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will let you know what their reply is, as I might need more help :)

 

It would also be interesting to see what they have on record about the declared hours of work and pay - Send the DWP a Subject Access Request asking for all computer and paper records held by all offices going back the last three years. This could take up to 40 days to get the file(s) back and should provide you and your sister with the evidence needed to fight the overpayment decision.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never knew that about the GL24 form??

 

They are still sending them out, only last week I received one?

 

Not another tactic to frustrate the process surely to god!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Very well done, as deliberately frustrating as this department is, the truth will always out.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read your thread. It took them long enough but congratulations on your success. :)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They admitted it was their mistake and she didnt have to pay it back.

 

Make several copies of this letter and file them away in different safe places. If you or your sister have a fireproof safe, store the original in there. There is a remote possibility that somewhere in the future, the DWP will attempt to reclaim this overpayment after having conveniently "lost" any record of this decision. Should this happen, you will have proof of "official error" and can tell them where to go (providing directions if required).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan it and email it to yourself and your sister too.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will do. And it didnt take them so long I just forgot to post it on here. It was fairly easy to win because they posted a copy of a letter my sister wrote to them in July 2012 telling them her working hours increased to 15 a week from 10. They just didnt act on it. They couldnt argue with us because they send us the copy of the letter so they basically screwed it themselves as they did admit they had a proof from us just didnt act on it. I doubt they will ever try to claim the money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done - always nice to see a positive outcome. As others have said, keep everything safe and keep multiple copies.

 

I will do thanks. Also wanted to thank whoever suggested asking for SAR. That wad the biggest help because when I asked them for everything they had on their system or file, they sent us the copy of the letter my sister wrote to them telling them about the change of working hours. They didnt have any copies of the telephone calls so I would just like to tell everyone, always do everything in writing with DWP :) thanks guys. I also made them pay back for the postage of all the letters we had to send them to fight them and they paid my sister back for the postage. I know it was only £14 but still :) why should we pay the postage if they made a mistake haha. Easy win this time :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do thanks. Also wanted to thank whoever suggested asking for SAR. That wad the biggest help because when I asked them for everything they had on their system or file, they sent us the copy of the letter my sister wrote to them telling them about the change of working hours. They didnt have any copies of the telephone calls so I would just like to tell everyone, always do everything in writing with DWP :) thanks guys. I also made them pay back for the postage of all the letters we had to send them to fight them and they paid my sister back for the postage. I know it was only £14 but still :) why should we pay the postage if they made a mistake haha. Easy win this time :)

 

You're on a roll! Could go for the hat-trick and claim for paper and envelopes used too - plus the 'anguish and worry' aspect too (which DWP can in fact make payments for if it can be proven). Then again..best not push it. As the song goes 'Two out of Three Ain't Bad' :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...