Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord forgot to renew tenancy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3719 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We moved in on January 2013, Fixed Term Agreement has a clausue that rent includes Council Tax for the first 12 months of tenancy. 12 moths passed, Tenancy expired and Landlady never contacted us regarding renewal or increase in the rent.

A two weeks ago we gave her a notice that we'll be moving out on 12 April. Today she called that we owe her money for two months Council Tax. We never saw the bill, it's in her name, and she never asked us to pay it before.

Do we owe the money? I don't think so. Can she deduct this from the deposit? which she hasn't protected by the way.

 

What do you think? Where do we stand?

 

Regards,

Jarek

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does your tenancy agreement state?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It states: "Rent includes Councill Tax for the firs 12 months" but this agreement expired on 12 January 2014 and She never told us we have to start paying CT, or how much it is. We also never seen the CT bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not too sure but i think once the original expires it becomes a rolling tenancy. Sit tight and someone should be around either tonight or tomorrow.

 

Just dont pay a penny without a full breakdown.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It defo becomes a rolling tenancy ( pst ) on the same terms as the original, but as the contract specifically refers to a limit for 12 months only, you should be paying it.

also would you not receive the demand at that address if you are on the register as living there?

Although why a LL would pay CT is beyond me? you are getting the services, and she must be paying CT where she lives?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's in her name.

I wanted it to be it my name but she refused.

We even had a visitor from council once asking who lives here but she asked us to tell them we're relatives staying for holidays.

I'm sure she also didn't protect our deposit.

 

After the contract ended we stayed in on the assumption the rent stays the same as she never contacted us regarding increase of the rent or arrangements who pays CT now.

 

Now when we moving out she says we owe her money for two months CT but she never arranged the payments with us. I don't think she can charge us backwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contract says that council tax is only paid for the first 12 months, so LL is technically correct. Technically though, you should inform the council and pay the council directly. But you should have informed the council when you moved in. You would have then claimed money of LL.

 

Landlady seems to be up to no good for some reason.

 

If the bill was in her name only she might have been claiming a single persons discount.

 

If council find out, they will want the rest of the money from you.

 

In future, if a LL tells you to do this, then don't. Having your landlord pay council tax is always problematical because it is the tenant who is responsible for the bill(except in a licenced HMO, I understand) and responsible for informing council they live there , so if the LL doesn't pay the bill the tenant is the one in trouble.

 

So I'd say you are in a tricky position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned already, the LL is fulling a fast one on the council. I would be tempted to contact the council and inform them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about it but I don't really want the trouble for her, and for us as well...

 

I just want to move out and don't argue with her about the money she forgot to tell us we shall be paying.

 

I think she realizes that she can't deduct this money from the deposit as it's unprotected and if worst comes to worst we could claim up to 3 times compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know she's pretty much breaking the law right? And IF she is caught in the future, you could be dragged into it?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm aware of this, so what should I do?

 

If I inform Council now that I lived there for 14 months and she'was on CT bill (I don't know if she was paying), what Council can do to me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have paid her, and she has been paying the bill, then they'll do nothing. Theyll just recalculate the Ctax and change it to your name. Not hers. It's obvious she's pulling a fast one, but it's better to be safe than sorry.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The LL may have the CT in her name because she want to show residnec at the property for when she sells it as a method of avoiding CGT on the increase in the value of the property. i would expect the rent to go down my a proportionate amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The LL could also be avoiding paying tax on the income from the property if she can show she lives there!!

You need to speak/contact her and ask why? and see if you can come to a sort of understanding about it and hopefully not have to pay the extra.

Also as deposit not protected she should not deduct anything from it, and you can sue her for that and get compensation ( expensive to do that )

so bring that to her attention as well.

You also consider court action which will bring all this out in the open, which she may not like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are all in it together because when the council visited you lied for the LL and said you are family staying there [meaning: not tenants].

 

Winning a law suit does not mean that the loser will pay up.

 

"I just want to move out and don't argue with her about the money she forgot to tell us we shall be paying."

 

It is in the contract that the CT is included in the rent during the first 12 months of the tenancy. LL has no duty to remind you what is in the contract and ask you to pay CT. They do not remind you monthly that you have to pay rent because it is in the contract. So is the deal about the CT.

 

When the fix term expires, the tenancy rolls over on the same terms. The CT exemption only applies to the first 12 months so without being reminded, you should start paying it when 12 month is over. You can not pay it if you do not know how much it is so you got a point about "wanting the LL to tell you to pay CT" aka wanting LL to inform you how much it is and the bar code / account to pay it into.

 

It happened to me twice that LLs changed the lock to evict me illegally while I was out. There is no law saying you can not change the lock [to prevent an illegal eviction]. To keep it friendly, ask for the CT bills and pay it if it does not cause financial hardship. You committed fraud by misrepresentation when you stated that you are relatives of the LL. Under duress, fearing getting a notice, was it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/50/section/5

 

LL does not have to renew tenancy upon expiry of the fix term because if the tenant stays in possession, by virtue of section 5 of the Housing Act 1988, a statutory periodic tenancy arises [above link].

 

Letting agents can charge for renewing tenancy agreements so they do [to get money off the tenant]. Otherwise it is absolutely unnecessary unless you want to extend the demise / property.

 

To quit you need to serve a Notice to Quit, one month clear notice, expires at the end of the period of the tenancy [the 12th of the month]. It has to be in writing and served at the LL's address which should be in the tenancy agreement.

 

Did you pay cash in hand for rent and no receipts? She does not want evidence that it is let so guess so..

 

A tenant has to pay rent even if it is a squatter who let her the property because by law we can not question the LL's [...]

don't remember the word, sorry [estate?]

 

If you gave her the right period of notice, you can move out on 12th April. You gave notice prior to 13th March, right?

 

A notice to quit terminates the tenancy so if you do not move out by 13th April but pay rent and LL accepts it, a new tenancy is created [even if it is not written down]. During the first 6 months of an AST tenant can only be evicted for breaking the contract terms [eg over 8 weeks rent arrears].

 

By any chance, it is a conversion, and does the LL live in one of the flats because then it is a common law tenancy and it does not roll on into a periodic tenancy as statute does not apply. In which case contract should have been renewed but never mind.

 

The thread is called "LL forgot to renew tenancy" in case you wondering why I'm going on about renewal.

 

"LL forgot to tell tax office about rental income"

 

Well, when did the dead line expire? End of January?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your free CT 12 months has finished and you are now liable for CT, so contact the Council to notify them of change in liability.

With a bit of luck, LL will have paid last years bill either by monthly DD or half yearly, so no CT due until Apr.

Council will then send you notification of CT payable for 2014-15 and a bill if any CT due since liability changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...