Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  Theres a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.   I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!   What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor ccj Carter & Co. - set a side won ...now claim proceeding.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Humfff!

Just a year away from SB and bryan carter gained a default ccj at my old address 2 month ago,I only found out after a credit search

 

I intend to apply for a set aside with a defence of not having received docs and original creditor should not have sold as they were in default of cca request and dsa request

What are the prospects of winning set aside

 

Relatively small debt but I still have equity in old address that is now rented

Onlyme again

Link to post
Share on other sites

First question. Did carter or the DCA they represented know that you are at your new address?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, yes I still have the correspondence, can I use it as part of the setaside

I am looking for grounds to guarantee it being set aside

Can a failure to supply cca and not supplying me with dsar and so setting account in dispute 4 years ago win itOC should not have sold the account in dispute

Onlyme

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they wrote to you at your correct address and fully knew where you were but they issued the claim to a previous address that is looking pretty good for you.

 

Hang fire for the legal guys to get here.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ...some information with regards to setting a side a regular Default Judgment:-

 

Regular Default Judgments

 

If the defendant fails to respond to a claim, which has been issued and served in accordance with the law, the claimant is entitled to apply for a default judgment. A default judgment entered in these circumstances is said to be “regular”.

 

The Law on Applying to Set Aside a Regular Default Judgment

 

If a defendant wants to set aside a default judgment he will have to make an application to the court.(N244 Application Notice) If the claim was not issued in the defendant’s local court the case will be transferred to that court and a hearing of the application will be listed.

 

To have a default judgment set aside the defendant will have to satisfy the following legal test found in Part 13 of the CPR:

 

• He has a defence with a real prospect of success; or,

• The judgment should be set aside for some other good reason;

• The application to set aside the judgment was made promptly.

 

Applying Promptly

 

In deciding whether or not the defendant has acted promptly in making their application the relevant date is usually the date on which the defendant found out about the judgment. Judges have differing views on what constitutes a prompt application. Some say that anything over four weeks shows that the defendant has failed to act promptly – others will entertain applications made many months later.

 

The Merits of the Defence

 

The defendant will also have to convince the judge that he has a defence that has a real prospect of succeeding. It is not enough for the defendant to show merely that he has a defence that would be arguable in law. The defendant should support their application with evidence.

 

Setting Aside Default Judgments on Terms

 

In some circumstances the judge may agree to set the judgment aside provided that certain conditions are met. For example, a judge could order the defendant to pay the amount claimed into court. This might be done in the case of a defendant who is pursuing a tenuous defence simply because he cannot afford to pay the debt.

 

The Defendant Says That He Never Received the Claim Form

 

The law on service of court documents states that:

 

• if the court sends the defendant a claim form at his usual or last known address; and,

• it is subsequently returned to the court as undelivered;

 

the claim form has still been validly served and the claimant is entitled to a regular default judgment.

 

Therefore, even if the defendant can persuade the judge that he never received the claim form, the judgment was still regular as a matter of law. However, it may provide an explanation for the defendant’s failure to respond to the claim.

 

The Judge’s Discretion

 

The law on default judgments provides judges with a wide discretion to set judgment aside. Justice demands that a judgment which has been entered with no, or little, regard to the merits of the claim should be set aside if the defendant has a good defence and made his application promptly. However, there is no point setting aside a default judgment if the defendant has no chance of defending the claim. It would be a waste of time and money because, ultimately, the claimant would simply obtain another judgment. The courts should be slow to deprive the claimant of a valid judgment obtained in accordance with the law.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy Orch, I need some help to put together a defence and application can you point me in the right direction

The claim and default judgement was made through the northampton bulk centre

 

as usual no details were supplied, such as whether they had the right to pursue, no documentation was supplied to support the claim etc etc

 

I am now 2 months in default of the judgement payment schedule as I only found out last week and i want to avoid further action

 

I spoke to them and over the phone in one conversation they have agreed a full and final of 50% without a lot of trying on my part

 

I urgently need to make a decision whether to settle or fight I am aware if I settle the claim will show for another 6 years on my credit file

 

onlyme

Link to post
Share on other sites

If theyve agreed a F&F of 50% of a judgement, then something isnt right. ESPECIALLY when carter is involved.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since they knew you were at a new address, but carter decided to issue on an old one on a bad debt at an old address, the set aside should be relatively straight forward. Carter is a very unscrupulous person. He will do whatever it takes to get a judgement, even on an unenforceable debt. he doesnt care as once a defence is filed, he runs off back under the rock he crawled out from. I'm just amazed he has managed to keep his solicitors licence.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

To set a side you complete the N244 application notice and submit your reasons for set a side ..you will have to outline a small synopsis of your intended defence.

 

To make payment arrangements you need to vary the judgment to mthly payment this is done using the N245...complete the I&E and make a proposed monthly payment.

 

If you wish to accept their offer of settlement and are happy to pay the agreed figure you suggest a Consent Order were they set a side the CCJ and then confirm the payment arrangements within the Consent Order.

 

All forms are available in the legal Library.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

the consent order looks a good option,

as it means that I can get on with my life without chasing around the courts for a maybe win at a set side

 

from what youve read so far can you suggest setaside grounds and with your experience do you think it could be successful

 

only me

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will set a side for you if you agree their terms by way of a Consent Order...you dont need to make application.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they dont agree to a consent order setting aside to their terms, how good a chance would I have a getting a full setaside with claim served at incorrect address, nomention of assignment or proof of debt on POC, and only a recon to s78 req from OC, also no reply to dsar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you tell them its your intention to set a side and would they like to consider a Consent Order...I would imagine they would go with it after offering 50% discount.

If not your chances are as good as any if it was deemed bad service....you would then have start from the beginning ..enter a defence and if you lose you are back to square one...without the 50% deduction.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Update, set aside hearing won with £400 costs awarded to me

Defence submitted, followed by the same old same old consent order route from BC

Hearing date read for 12 September

Witness statement received this weekend with old application in parts illegible plus a statement of default with no default notice

A letter of assignment with no evidence of it

And a current terms and conditions with (EDIT) one heading addressed to my current address which is a compete fabrication

I need a new amendment to my defence

 

They also state that they won't be attending court. I am livid about this because they know that I will win on default notice alone

I need some defence input if anyone can help

Can I ask for costs, still small claims

Onlyme

Edited by Andyorch
Removed bad language
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you need a new amendment to your defence and why do you need some defence input...you state you have submitted your defence?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread title amended to reflect latest developments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What were the Directions after the set aside hearing?

 

Why did you not exchange a witness statement of your own?

 

You're not meant to be defending or rebutting their witness statement, that's what your evidence at trial is for.

 

I am catching up with it a bit

The hearing is an allocation and directions hearing. The purpose of which is to establish the issues and determination of likely issues and length of final trial

 

The set aside hearing judgement set aside the default judgment and ordered a defence to be filed (duly done pretty well asking for documents)

 

Their witness statement now provides the documents listed above

Onlyme

Link to post
Share on other sites

setaside judgment:

 

1Default judgment is setaside

2Defendant shall file and serve defence by ..... june

3 The clamant shall pay £400 by ...May

 

General form of Judgment:

1 List for allocation and directions on 12th September

2 All parties or legal reps MUST ATTEND

3 Purpose of hearing is to establish dispute and determining likely length of trial

 

Interestingly they are saying they will not be attending in their letter accompanying the witness statement to my original defence

 

onlyme

Edited by ohitsonlyme
pressed enter and loaded in error
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...