Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
    • Paula Venomous refused to resign for 16 months and eventually did only because a doctor threatened to resign. Interesting snippets and insights in the article. Paula Vennells clung on to ‘plum’ NHS role after Horizon scandal ARCHIVE.PH archived 19 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accused of theft


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i work for a large firm somthibg gone missing ive been accused amd suspended and my manager has e-mailed everyne in the firm and i mean everyone not to contact me or talk to me even in the street most people who work there live in my area,please could somone tell me if this was lawfull or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - I have moved your post to a new thread so that more people will be able to see it and respond :-)

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanx for the welcome and speedy reply,

 

a week ago i was called into a meeting by my floor manager and HR and

 

was presented with an acusation of theft,

a computer had gone missing not a laptop but a full computer,and

because i have access to the room in which all IT equiptment is stored

along with about ten other people including the manager who has made the accusation,

but all computers are under lock and key and the manager is the key holder which we need his permission to enter

 

there is a swipe card on the room so all times and dates are recorded,

and unbeknown to the work force a camera was placed in the room because of another incident also a theft of a lot of laptops,

 

ive been sent evidence in the post ie- photo stills and a list of people who entered the room over a certain period,

 

it shows i entered the room twice

another male entered eight times and

a female entered once,

 

this room has two entrances and

 

one is an exit to the outside which people use as a conveinient way of leaving the building,

must say within this room is a large cage were all laptops a PCs are stored which the manager has the key,

 

the evidence they have presented does not show anyone taking anything in or out of this room or cage

but because i was carrying my gym bag and laptop bag

im the one whos been accused,

 

i am of good character and ive been promoted twice in two years

work nights on my own and

manage a small team of techs

 

ive had no complaints about my work and

enjoy my job

but my floor manager

who only started a couple of weeks before the last theft of laptops is my accuser,

 

the lad who was blamed and sacked for the theft still swears to this day it wasnt him

he really was an honest guy

but this manager was adamant it was him and got managment to sack him,

 

i dont want to throw accusations about

but i know it wasnt me and

im sure the other lad who was sacked was also innocent

 

,im only twenty years of age

and feel this is going to ruin what i thought was going to be a career

that would lead to bigger and better things

but the e-mail that was broadcast to the company has already made me an outcast

as my colleagues and those i thought freinds now think im a thief

 

i am devastated

its proper shattered me,

 

ive a meeting on monday with the same people including the floor manager ive mentioned.

 

please any advice would be most welcome.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

The forum guys should be along over the course of the weekend, but it's always quieter here than during the week.

 

I've put some paragraphs into your post to make it easier to read. If you could try to put them in future posts that you make, it should get you more advice. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SO they sacked someone for allegedly stealing thousands of pounds worth of IT equipment and didnt involve the police, and never had any evidence at all?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats right no police,if i could tell you the company you would understand,they handle all sorts of media and sport they are the handlers of all betting results so the last thing they want is the law snooping,so this means they are a law unto them selves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand,

how can they have a camera pointing at all the equipment

and it not show who was in the cage?

 

Do you have to swipe out of the room as well?

 

That would show the length of time you were in with your bag

and who had time to unlock a cage and carry stuff out.

 

By "whole computer" I take it you mean tower, screen, keyboard etc,

not something light

 

so you need to see the footage of how you carry the bag not a still,

or else it has to be a number of trips by someone to take stuff one by one

 

so how many time do you have your bag on you?

 

by answering these questions you can defend yourself.

 

How many people checked thru the footage to compile the stills

it should be at least 2 people ie not your main suspect by themselves.

 

And by the way to prove theft

they have to show the equipment was taken with the intent to deliberately deprive the rightful owner forever.

 

Just some thoughts I hope they help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hilly,

Yes that's correct the IT equipment was suppose to be in a 'locked' cage

but this was not followed by the correct procedure

as apart of another IT Team.

 

The allegation was just solely a tower

but for this to be carried out within the time space of 20 - 30 seconds

and to fit in a gym bag is highly highly unlikely.

 

You do have to swipe in and out of the IT equipment room

and the time sheets have been provided

and this verifies that i have enter the room

and exited within 30 seconds

which carrying two hands with a broken hand is acceptable by any mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it sounds like you can produce enough of a defense. make sure you ask the questions I raised and get the answers especially viewing the footage! Suggest you would welcome the involvement of the Police. Keep calm and think logically you'll be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as a side issue these things often end up on ebay - have a wee check for the model and see if one appeared locally recently?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would tell them that the police must be informed and all evidence passed to them.

Insist on this, so they know that it wasn't you stealing the pc.

 

If they carry on with their attack, report yourself to the police.

 

I've done it once when I was accused by a customer of having racially attacked him

and my manager at the time was going to apologise without looking at cctv and give me a final written warning.

 

They decided to carry on with this nonsense and, customer complaint in hand

I went to local police station and reported the incident.

 

The desk officer initially didn't want to know,

but I asked to see the sergeant and

 

he took a statement from me as well as a copy of the customer complaint.

 

I took the crime reference number to my manager and he went bananas, panicking like a nutter.

 

Within 15 minutes I was called by hr and told that the customer had dropped the complaint.

 

I took it a step further.

 

I contacted this customer employer,

a well known bank,

and passed them the original complaint sent from work along with the crn.

 

They sacked him for misuse of company facilities,

make false allegations

using such facilities and bringing company name in disrepute.

 

He came to my shop in tears while he was suspended

asking for forgiveness and to withdraw the complaint.

 

I said: "F.You!"

 

After he got sacked he came again and threatened to kill me.

 

He got nicked and charged.

 

You should serve the same treatment to your manager falsely accusing you of a criminal offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the meeting a disciplinary meeting or an investigatory?

I would strongly suggest that you take a colleague/union rep with you if it is a disciplinary.

You need to concentrate on your defence.

Prior to a disciplinary you should have a copy of all the evidence that they intend to use. You need to determine when and how they believe you took this and prove that this was not the case.

Did the shape/weight of the bag change?

You also need to ask why the door was left unsecured and who checked the data/cctv for this period.

How long have you worked there for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its an investigation,and i have the evidence from the first meeting but things have changed

 

their attitude has now changed because ive asked a third party representative to come along for support

and the will not answer any questions until my hearing

(she stressed it was still an investigation)

so my representetive sent her a message.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Miss

it seems you've been misinformed

you do not have to be a union rep to represent an employee in a tribunal

 

a representative can be anybody of good character

and if i can represent in a court of law t

hen you have no right to deny Mr W a fair and just hearing,

 

Mr W wants nothing but a speedy conclusion to this situation

and wants to return to work as soon as possible,

and your delaying tactics will only hinder the process of a fair and just hearing,

for what is one of your employees.

 

I have contacted Mr Managing Director/Chairman and informed him of what is occurring within his business

along with list of questions submitted to your office,

and i will contact anyone who appears to be your superior

and inform them of your lack of knowledge in the areas concerning tribunals for disgruntled employees.

 

your sincerely

Mr D

 

this is what was sent.

Edited by davejeno
my stupidity
Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Who is making the allegation.

2)Has head office been informed (london office).

3)Do you have the footage of Mr w exiting the room with the alleged computer and not the stills,and may we have a copy for our investigation.

4)How many people have checked the footage and who compiled the time line in stills.

5)Is the hidden camera in the smoke alarm on the same system as all CCTV cameras or is it an individual camera independant of all others.

6)Can you prove the equiptment was taken with the intent of deliberatley deprive the owner forever.

7)How many people entered the room in the previous fourteen days before the allegation was made and this includes weekend casuals who dont have swipe cards,hence why the door is left a-jar for conveinience sake.

8)A few months ago an employee was sacked (london Office)for a simular allegation,were the police involved? and if so can we have the crime reference number for our investigation,and if not,why not.

9)Have the police been informed about this allegation and do you have the crime reference number given when reported,and if so may we have it for our own investigation.

10)Besides Mr w's imidiate manager who is responsable for the secure storage of all IT equiptment and who is the key holder for said storage.

11)Who gave authority to use company facilities to broadcast an E-mail to company employees not to aproach or converse with

Mr W

 

without vexation

d

Edited by davejeno
my stupidity
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Miss

it seems you've been misinformed you do not have to be a union rep to represent an employee in a tribunal

a representative can be anybody of good character and if i can represent in a court of law then you have no right to deny Mr a fair and just hearing,Mr W wants nothing but a speedy conclusion to this situation and wants to return to work as soon as possible,and your delaying tactics will only hinder the process of a fair and just hearing, for what is one of your employees.

 

I have contacted Mr Managing Director/Chairman and informed him of what is occurring within his his business along with list of questions submitted to your office,and i will contact anyone who appears to be your superior and inform them of your lack of knowledge in the areas concerning tribunals for disgruntled employees.

 

your sincerely

Mr D

 

this is what was sent.

 

And if it's for an investigatory meeting, it's wrong. So that's not a good start! Is Mr D an employee of the company?

 

Question 6 reads as "he took it, can you prove he didn't mean to bring it back." Not clever. I suggest you stop Mr D sending emails on your behalf immediately.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...