Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep let us have a good laugh eh from today’s Telegraph 🤣😂🤣 the rest must try harder    Farage won Friday’s election debate, a poll finds Nigel Farage won Friday night’s seven-way BBC election debate, according to a poll.  A snap poll of 1,031 voters by More in Common found most thought Mr Farage won the debate, followed by Angela Rayner. Mr Farage received 25 per cent of the vote while Ms Rayner received 19 per cent. The Green Party’s Carla Denyer was the third most popular with 11 per cent, Stephen Flynn for SNP received 10 per cent and Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the House of Commons, took 7 per cent of the vote. Daisy Cooper, the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru’s Rhun ap Iorwerth took 5 per cent and 2  per cent respectively. The debate saw Britain’s main seven political parties clash ahead of the general election on July 4.  Mr Farage, who returned to frontline politics for Reform this week and is standing as an MP in Clacton, challenged his political rivals on immigration and net zero policies.
    • Hi CAG Team, I'm seeking your skills and help for a NtK my partner received through the post earlier this week. To give a little backstory, my partner and I, along with our young children (4 and 7), decided to go on a camping holiday about 3 hours away from us. We took a car each because we didn't have enough room in one car. We arrived at the services at very similar times as we followed each other the whole way. So, two cars. My partner has received this NtK, but I haven't. This NtK dropped through the front door on Wednesday, June 5, 2024.  We both parked in the Burger King car park, not in BP; we got out, all went for a toilet break, got some food from the BP garage and returned to our cars to eat.  After eating, we took the kids to the toilet again before leaving to complete our journey. I didn't notice any parking restriction signs and can't get back to the location due to how far away it is. I noticed another person had an issue here and reported it to you, and they managed to get the fine dropped. See below. To me, it looks like they have cameras at the complex's entrance and exit. I'm not sure if they own the land/car park by Burger King, so I'm not sure if this is a legal contract or not.  I find that 30 mins limit at a Services that serves hot food to be ridiculous and unfair, especially as we had kids to feed and water.  And the fact that I didn't receive the same NtK despite us driving in and out together is just crazy. This is the location - I also uploaded a map image. Google Maps MAPS.APP.GOO.GL ★★★☆☆ · Restaurant   1 Date of the infringement 24th May 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 29th May 2024   3 Date received 5th June 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y - Only entering and exiting the complex/land.   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N   7 Who is the parking company? MET   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] BP Blue Boys, Tonbridge TN12 7HE   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA Anyway, I hope you can help me out with some guidance on how to proceed with this. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Passerby0233 2024-06-08 13_17_52-Burger King - Google Maps — Mozilla Firefox.pdf NtK_29-05-2024.compressed.pdf
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre (Northampton) Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group (UK) Limited How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 23/5/24 AOS - Tues, 11/6/24 (19 days)  Defence - Thurs, 25/6/24 (33 days) Particulars of Claim 1. The Claimant claims the sum of £7926 for an outstanding debt owed. 2. On 20/4/18 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank for a Credit Card under reference [16 numbers]. 3. On 10/5/22 the Defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £7296. 4. On 28/11/23 the debt of £7296 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925. The Claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) to act on its behalf and the CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £7925 What is the total value of the claim? £8481 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? I believe I sent a letter by registered mail of a change in address to abroad in 2021. Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Why did you cease payments? Unable to afford, living abroad What was the date of your last payment? Unsure (probably 2021) Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No ................... I have read through a number of similar threads, one thing i'm not sure how to proceed about is that I live abroad in the middle east and have done for several years. The claim letter was sent to my parents address and I really don't want them to be harassed about this. I am sure I sent the original creditor a registered letter with my change of address but can't find this currently. I am not in a position to pay this, and tend to come back to the UK to see family at most once a year (less since Covid),  not particular bothered about my financial score...more concerned about harassment of my parents. I have not registered on the gov gateway or anything like that.  Details below (as best as i can), and thank you for taking the time to look into it. Also redacted claim form attached: Claim form 23-5-24.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells/Carters Claim Form - old Lloyds Current Account OD **DISCONTINUED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I guys need some help

 

been sent a claim form from Northhampton CC on behalf of Lowells Portfolio Ltd and Bryan Carters Solicitors

regarding a debt we have no knowledge of,

 

seems a bit cliché but we actually do not know how we have this debt.

 

Out of the blue we had a letter two days ago regarding their intentions

 

and then voilà the claim for arrived.

 

I have dealt with debt agencies before but never has the happened so fast,

 

I really need some help and advice on how to deal with this,

 

Thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Respond to the vexatious claim and state that you intend on defending this spurious claim in full, what him run.

 

Have you checked your credit file?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you check your credit file your checking to see what is on there, if there are any defaults, and if so, whose name in next to the default.

 

Check it first before responding, I do believe you have 18 days in which to respond to a summons???

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is whats on the credit file with regards to the debt:

 

Lender - LLOYDS BANK PLC

Type - Current Account

Status - Default

Balance - Satisfied

Updated- 11/08/2013

 

Lender - LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD Type - Current Account

Status - Default

Balance - £536

Updated - 22/09/2013

 

Claim Form Amount £ 687.77

 

thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

register with MCOL

 

then log in

enter the claim form password

 

ack the claim.

 

defend all

 

don't tick the jurisdiction box

 

type up the PoC exactly as it appears on the claim form.

 

send carter a CPR 31:14

 

if you have no statements etc

might be an idea to send Lloyds an SAR to get them.recorded post

 

might get through in time.

 

 

Registered Office:

 

25 Gresham Street,

 

London EC2V 7HN

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks letsgetitsorted,

 

working on my defence at the moment which having spoke to my wife said the reason why we stopped using LLoyds

was they put the account overdrawn by £60 in charges then they added unauthorised overdraft fees

then put on an overdraft for £500 thats how it was left and

 

now we are here some five and a half years later with a £687 debt.

 

My wife did not spend on the overdraft just left the account as is

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then IMO a debt made up completely of bank charges should never even get in front of a Judge, he will absolutely love this when he realises it is made up entirely of the banks fees and charges!

Brilliant, would love to be a fly on the wall if BC thinks he can win with this!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

register with MCOL

 

then log in

enter the claim form password

 

ack the claim.

 

defend all

 

don't tick the jurisdiction box

 

type up the PoC exactly as it appears on the claim form.

 

send carter a CPR 31:14

 

if you have no statements etc

might be an idea to send Lloyds an SAR to get them.recorded post

 

might get through in time.

 

 

Registered Office:

 

25 Gresham Street,

 

London EC2V 7HN

 

dx

 

dx100uk, I have done the "Acknowledgement of Service" as per the instructions but now a little stuck you have asked me to type up the POC what do I do with that now? also to send Carter a CPR31:14, where do I find this? many thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Type out their particulars here (verbatim) less any identifiable data.

 

CPR 31.14 current accounts here:-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387483-LEGAL-CPR-31.14-Request-when-Claim-is-being-made-for-a-Current-Account

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Type out their particulars here (verbatim) less any identifiable data.

 

CPR 31.14 current accounts here:-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387483-LEGAL-CPR-31.14-Request-when-Claim-is-being-made-for-a-Current-Account

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

thank you Andy here goes:-

 

THIS CLAIM IS FOR XXX.XX THE AMOUNT DUE UNDER AN AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR AND THE DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE FINANCE AND / OR SERVICES AND / OR GOODS.

 

THIS DEBT WAS ASSIGNED TO / PURCHASED BY Lowell Portfolio I Ltd ON 24/06/2013

AND SERVED PURSUANT TO THE LAWS OF PROPERTY ACT 1925

 

PARTICULARS

Re: Lloyds

A/C No. 123456789

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS XXX.XX

 

THE CLAIMANT ALSO CLAIMS INTEREST PURSUANT TO S69 COUNTY COURT ACT 1984 FROM 24/06/2013 TO DATE AT 8% PER ANNUM TO XX.XX

Edited by Andyorch
Amounts removed

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found the statements and true to my word we had a credit of £4.67 as of the 9/09/2008 then they honoured a DD for 69.84 putting us overdrawn by 65.17, thereafter the debt has risen with only charges and interest to the current debt, I was wrong to say we had an overdraft.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's their usual crap vague poc too

 

there is no agreement as such toward current accounts

 

so it will be interesting to see what they post back regarding the cpr docs, particularly the 'agreement' for this.

 

I can see carter running away from this.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's their usual crap vague poc too

 

there is no agreement as such toward current accounts

 

so it will be interesting to see what they post back regarding the cpr docs, particularly the 'agreement' for this.

 

I can see carter running away from this.

 

I wish they wouldn't but I think your right dx100uk

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't still use these charlatans do you?

I kicked them into touch for exactly the same reason a couple of years ago.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't still use these charlatans do you?

I kicked them into touch for exactly the same reason a couple of years ago.

 

unfortunately so, our finamcial situation needs to change so we are lumbered with them until we sort out our credit rating too

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your not lumbered with them at all.

 

Vote with your feet and open an account with a different banking group, try the CO-OP, if you don't change banks then they will continue to hold you to ransom.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your not lumbered with them at all.

 

Vote with your feet and open an account with a different banking group, try the CO-OP, if you don't change banks then they will continue to hold you to ransom.

 

ok will certainly see what the co-op can do for us, thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reply back from Bryan Carter:

 

We can confirm the claim form was issued by the Northampton County Court Bulk Centre and the the Courts Protocol was followed when issuing the Claimants Particulars of Claim. Practice Direction 7c point 1.4 (3A) eliminates the requirements to attach the document to the Particulars of Claim then they are issued by this court.

 

We can confirm this matter will most be allocated to the Small Claims Track as this a simple contractual matter and Part 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules will therefore not apply.

 

In any event the Notices of Default and Assignment left the control of the Claimant when they were despatched to you.

 

It is the original creditors policy to issue agreements at the start of the contract and statements throughout the duration of the agreement and, in this regard, we ask you to refer to your own records.

 

We confirm we are not agreeable to an extension for filing your defence.

 

we confirm we are in receipt of your acknowledgement of service.

 

As you will be aware a Claim was issued in this matter on 5 February 2014. Please respond to the Claim.....blah blah blah

 

Right i need to get my defence in so how do we go about writing one up when the debt is made up of charges and interest,

 

Many Thanks

 

Kev

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

usual rubbish from carter

 

bet he'll run away soon.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right back now, to start the defence we have statements that show this bank have a history of returning our direct debits but on the 9th Sept 2008 we had a balance of : £4.67 in credit they then honour a DD for £69.84 putting us overdrawn by 65.17 then charges as follows:

02/09/2008 to 01/10/2008 = 185.94

02/10/2008 to 03/11/2008 = 31.30

04/01/2008 to 01/12/2008 = 2.95

02/12/2008 to 02/01/2009 = 3.86

03/01/2009 to 02/02/2009 = 78.78

03/02/2009 to 02/03/2009 = 159.47

03/03/2009 to 01/04/2009 = 4.87

02/04/2009 to 01/05/2009 = 7.19

02/05/2009 to 01/06/2009 = 7.51

02/06/2009 to 01/07/2009 = 7.37

07/07/2009 to 03/08/2009 = 8.23

03/09/2009 = 7.58

 

I am not sure if these figures help but would need help to get my defence papers drawn up, thank you

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...