Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I'm wondering if someone can advise me on something. I'm appealing an order and have been asked to submit an appeal bundle and the below points are required to be included: 1) transcript of the judgment of the lower court on other record of reasons.  2) Statement of case. I'm wondering if anyone knows that "on other record of reasons" means. Also for statement of case would it just be a long document covering the reason for the claim, the findings of the lower court, why it was wrong and what I seek instead?   Thanks,
    • Hello, Thanks for the advice. I asserted my rights to reject and they accepted it and said they will refund me the full amount.  My question now is how long do they usually take to collect the vehicle? I've made it clear that I'm available for them to collect it whenever and I've been told its been passed on to the collections team. I chased it up today as its also raining heavily at the moment.  I just wondered if anyone had any experience on how long they usually take to collect? I'd obviously like it collected as soon as possible as I need to purchase another car.  Is it likely they will drag on the process of collection and what can I do if they do?  Thanks!
    • Why are FCA’s “name and shame” proposals causing a stir?View the full article
    • I am coming back to this thread after receiving a Single envelope containing 2 letters: 1 from Max Recovery telling me that my account was transferred to Drydens Fairfax in 2007 1 from Drydens Fairfax telling me that they are under instruction from their client to seek repayment.   These relate to a Barclays Overdraft from the early 00s, last payment through PayPlan was 04 June 2019, but neither of the letters are from Barclays themselves.   I have informed Drydens in both May 2019 and June 2023 of changes of address. No letters beyond a confirmation of the change and a request for finanical details have been received, which ive ignored.   What i was wanting to know is do i just ignore these as per previous advice? I know that i cant CCA an overdraft debt but what is the usual "plan" for dealing with old overdraft debts? Am i trying to run the clock down until June 2025 when it becomes statue barred?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default not registered


musicronny
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3754 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I defaulted on 5 accounts in 2010, of which 4 of them registered a default on my credit file.

 

The other one,

Barclaycard, transferred the debt

in May 2012 to IDR Finance and

they have appointed Link Financial to manage the account.

 

I checked my file last month and

 

Link Finance have been marking the account on my credit file every month with a (6) and a BB underneath.

 

Whilst the debt was with Barclaycard,

I received a Default Notice through Mercers in Oct 2010.

 

Has anyone had any experience of getting Link finance to change these entries to the correct status?

 

And are there and standard type letters I can send to them?

 

This Barclaycard was originally a Morgan Stanley card then a Goldfish card before becoming a Barclaycard.

 

I CCA'd Barclaycard in 2010 and they sent me T&Cs.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to Link and attach a copy of your Default Notice from BB and inform them of the Default start date IE 2010.Its important that you mark across the copy Default Notice " DEBTORS COPY FOR CONFORMATION ONLY " corner to corner in RED

 

 

Ask them why they are falsifying the data by amending the default term by 6 ?

 

On the bottom of your letter copy to All Credit Reference Agencies /ICO.

 

 

See what response you get...if you dont then send it to the copied parties.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

surely as long as Plink have not changed the default date in the summary of the debt

whatever they mark the file with, make little difference?

 

certainly not harming you if the above is correct.

 

I hope you are not paying plink anything?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

There's no mention of a default, at all on my file for the link account. The other 4 accounts that also defaulted, have the date the defaults were registered.

 

I am on a DMP with payplan and the barclaycard was included. So they are getting something every month!

Link to post
Share on other sites

check another cra provider don't rely on one alone.

 

just remember there is no direct link between a DN and the marking or not of your CRa file with a 'default'

 

a DN is a letter advising you that under the CCA your account will enter a default state

in 14 days if you don't meet the required balance.

 

it has not relation to your cra file sadly.

 

now ofcourse

the debt should have been given a efault date long ago.

 

also just remember that the red 6 IS the qiv of a default status on a cra file.

 

as with all your debts...

 

I hope you've sent them a CCA request?

 

if plink don't hold an enforceable CCa they can go swivel!!

 

when did you take the card out?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send link a CCA request

 

bet Barclays don't have one.

 

you ideally should do this with all your debts.

 

don't just take things as 'given' that you owe everything they claim.

 

get a second CRa file too

 

noddle is free

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great idea!

 

just remember.

 

you need to look at the first 'marker' on this file 1, 2 ,3,4, etc blobs...

 

you'll prob find that BC didn't carry the DN threat through as you entered into a DMP?

after the 1,2 blobs appeared?

 

if BC sold the debt and LINK are now shown as the owner on the CRA file

 

there is most probably something wrong with the debt.

 

you ldeally need to sar BC and get all the statements.

 

find out the reason why they sold it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say a default notice was sent, but was the account actually defaulted Barclaycard is known for sending DNs but not placing the actual default. or did you pay the amount required to rectify the default.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say a default notice was sent, but was the account actually defaulted Barclaycard is known for sending DNs but not placing the actual default. or did you pay the amount required to rectify the default.

 

Hi BRIGADIER2JCS,

 

I received the DN from Mercers in Oct 2010 and my first payment into my DMP was Nov 2010. I haven't spoke to or payed barclaycard anything since May 2010 other than through my DMP.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

great idea!

 

just remember.

 

you need to look at the first 'marker' on this file 1, 2 ,3,4, etc blobs...

 

you'll prob find that BC didn't carry the DN threat through as you entered into a DMP?

after the 1,2 blobs appeared?

 

if BC sold the debt and LINK are now shown as the owner on the CRA file

 

there is most probably something wrong with the debt.

 

you ldeally need to sar BC and get all the statements.

 

find out the reason why they sold it.

 

dx

 

Hi dx,

 

I have checked CRAs CheckMyFile and Noddle and both have Link as the owner of the debt and both started with (6) markers from May 2012.

 

Here are the markers that BC put on the account from Mar - Dec 2010.

 

MAR (1) APR (AR) MAY (AR) JUN (AR) JUL (AR) AUG (2) SEP (3) OCT (4) NOV (5) DEC (6)....The (6)'s until sold to Link.

 

I CCA'd this account in 2010 when BC owned it and they sent me their current T&Cs at that time. I would imagine, as this account has been passed from MSDW to Goldfish to BC, that the original signed agreement (2004) can't be found.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I want to sort this default status out is because it will be the only one left on my CF in 3 years time as the others will drop off.

 

Until then I will be paying my DMP and looking to make reduced F&F settlements with as many creditors as I can.

 

I will be playing hardball with those who cannot produce a valid CCA

which as to date is 2 (BC & Halifax CC)

and maybe an Egg Card which was also transferred to BC in NOV 2011.

 

http://s840.photobucket.com/albums/zz328/musicronny/Egg%20CCA/ Egg CCA

 

All the help and advice is much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx,

 

I have checked CRAs CheckMyFile and Noddle and both have Link as the owner of the debt and both started with (6) markers from May 2012.

 

Here are the markers that BC put on the account from Mar - Dec 2010.

 

MAR (1) APR (AR) MAY (AR) JUN (AR) JUL (AR) AUG (2) SEP (3) OCT (4) NOV (5) DEC (6)....The (6)'s until sold to Link.

 

I CCA'd this account in 2010 when BC owned it and they sent me their current T&Cs at that time. I would imagine, as this account has been passed from MSDW to Goldfish to BC, that the original signed agreement (2004) can't be found.

 

then link are doing nowt wrong sadly.

 

just remember that on a mortgage search

 

they get the SUMMARY ONLY

 

so if the debt does not say a big red default on its summary line

then it wont hurt you. and they wont see the late markers

 

this is actually better for you than others found

that HAVE a default in the summary.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BRIGADIER2JCS,

 

I received the DN from Mercers in Oct 2010 and my first payment into my DMP was Nov 2010. I haven't spoke to or payed barclaycard anything since May 2010 other than through my DMP.

 

Regards

Hi, my concern here is that a 'default notice' is not actually a default just a 'notice' informing a debtor that a creditor will take action (defaulting the account) if the account is not remedied BC as said have been known to use DNs and then not actually place a defualt.

 

Was does your credit reference file show i.e. the default date?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx,

 

I have checked CRAs CheckMyFile and Noddle and both have Link as the owner of the debt and both started with (6) markers from May 2012.

 

Here are the markers that BC put on the account from Mar - Dec 2010.

 

MAR (1) APR (AR) MAY (AR) JUN (AR) JUL (AR) AUG (2) SEP (3) OCT (4) NOV (5) DEC (6)....The (6)'s until sold to Link.

 

I CCA'd this account in 2010 when BC owned it and they sent me their current T&Cs at that time. I would imagine, as this account has been passed from MSDW to Goldfish to BC, that the original signed agreement (2004) can't be found.

 

It would appear from this information that the account is NOT defaulted these are late payment markers which can be worse than a default as if there is no default the account can be continually reported as in arrears and will not be removed from files after 6 years.

 

You need to ascertain the true status of the account and when you have done so you can challenge this and get the actual date of the default shown on CRA file.

 

The ICO says that LP markers should not be used to replace a default.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear from this information that the account is NOT defaulted these are late payment markers which can be worse than a default as if there is no default the account can be continually reported as in arrears and will not be removed from files after 6 years.

 

You need to ascertain the true status of the account and when you have done so you can challenge this and get the actual date of the default shown on CRA file.

 

The ICO says that LP markers should not be used to replace a default.

 

So, as it seems Link are doing nothing wrong, I will have to write to BC and get them to check their records and get their Data Controller to change the status of the account to defaulted.

 

As a rule, how many months in arrears does an account have to be before it's defaulted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3

 

on the summary line of that debt on say noddle

 

if it does not say defaulted in red at the top

iy wont hurt your mortgage.

when doing a credit check.

they just see the summary line

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very variable but the ICO says defaults should be placed within 6 months of the 'cause of action' in your case within 6 months from the cessation of contractually required payments.

Some creditors will default o 3 missed payments some more ridged by do so on 2 .

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

3

 

on the summary line of that debt on say noddle

 

if it does not say defaulted in red at the top

iy wont hurt your mortgage.

when doing a credit check.

they just see the summary line

 

dx

 

But won't that affect my overall credit score when applying for a mortgage?

 

As the other accounts, with defaults, will drop off my credit file at the end of 2016... the link account will stay on my file until 6 years after its settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

on your flie

 

the ones with a default

say default in the summary [to] line default is in red

 

on the link one its says nothing about it being bad?

 

yes?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

try this from noddle

 

this mortgage shows late

 

under other accounts

 

3 have late payments

one upto red 6 - it does not show anything

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

try this from noddle

 

this mortgage shows late

 

under other accounts

 

3 have late payments

one upto red 6 - it does not show anything

 

dx

 

Hi dx,

 

Yes my Noddle credit file looks the same as the attachment.

 

Regards CCA's, if Link fail to provide the original signed agreement (which they will) what are the next steps I should take with them?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

12+2 working days for the CCA.

 

you stop payments and send the failure to comply letter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...