Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Gas large bill won't except D/D


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3795 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All I was hoping somebody might be able to advice me o how I should proceed.

 

In December a number of D/D failed due to my money not being in the bank on time

and with the hussle and bustle of Xmas and new year I didn't really notice but

 

as soon as I did I contacted all parties concerned to reset up the D/D and everyone except BG were very helpful.

 

Our previous D/D had been £80 a month which was slowly bring down the amount we owed them (about £200) plus paying the bill,

 

when I tried to set up the D/D again they refused unless I gave them an up to date meter reading as it had been estimated since last Feb

when they got their last actual meter reading.

 

I rang them back with new meter reading and was shocked to find it was over 3700 units different to their estimated reading,

 

once this was added to our current bill it came out to over £800!.

 

The other problem was because we had missed another D/D in June because of similar problems

they wouldn't or couldn't set up a D/D.

 

The options I was given was to pay the whole bill or go down the key meter route.

 

Obviously there is noway I can afford to pay them over £800 and I don't want a key meter,

eventually after he discussed with the billing dept he told me he could reinstate the D/D

but it would be for £198 a month,

 

again I can't afford that but to show willing I explained I could stretch to £120

but was again refused so once more I was left with the two initial options.

 

I finished the phone call by saying I would pay BG £120 at the end of the month when I get paid

and then the same amount each month and possibly more if I have any spare money.

 

I was still told this wasn't a good enough solution but would stop me from being disconnected

and the debit passed on to DCA for this month. But I would have to either pay the bill in full or have a key meter, no other options.

 

Can BG do this if I'm trying to pay off my debit?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the BG DD had failed due to your having insufficient funds in your account at Christmas

then what usually happens is that BG are informed by the Bank & then BG apply for payment again within 10 days.

(But what with the Christmas period this would be longer)

 

So did you actually cancel the BG DD instead of having the DD returned?

I ask as BG will attempt payment again on a live DD that failed the first time, so I would double check.

 

If you had cancelled the DD then log into your BG account online & reset up your DD

& you can choose the payment dates etc.

You are also able to make additional payments towards your debt as & when you can via your online BG account.

 

Ive had my own issues with BG as I moved home & it took BG months to get them to close out my old accounts

& reset up my new ones & getting my credit sorted out.

I got so fed up with their generic replies & calls that I logged into my online BG account & sorted it out myself & reset up my DD to suit me.

 

I also input my meter readings as & when so I can keep an eye on my usage & get proper bills instead of estimated ones.

Id suggest to any BG customers to sign up & get their online accounts up & running as its so simple to use & you can keep track of your accounts.

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did try and do it online after the phone call but it wouldn't accept any lower D/D than £198. I had 3 D/D that were cancelled for some reason and as i said the other two companies were fine about setting them back up again.

 

I agree that sending a meter reading every month should make things much easier but other things sometimes get in the way and I can be quite forgetful, but still I wasn't expecting such a huge difference. I appreciate that we probably may use more electric than average as we have no mains gas and so have one oil filled electric heater in the front room and an immersion heater for water but over £600 more!

 

I was just surprised at how much more we have apparently used but also the BG stance of either pay it all or have a key meter fitted, no middle ground.

 

As I said in my previous post I was willing to stretch, and it would have been a stretch, to £120 a month,

£40 extra than what I had been paying but that still wasn't good enough.

 

Like many people I'm on minimum wage and things like this worry me sick,

if they keep increasing the price but my wages don't increase

then I'm never going to be able to pay it off and I will be in debt to BG for ever

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must send or give a eter reading every month

 

that's the way to do it.

 

i'd question how you've used an extra 10kW every 24hrs if the 3700 extra is correct

 

that's like leaving a 500W heater on full blast all the time

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must send or give a eter reading every month

 

that's the way to do it.

 

i'd question how you've used an extra 10kW every 24hrs if the 3700 extra is correct

 

that's like leaving a 500W heater on full blast all the time

 

dx

 

I agree it does seem like a lot, I'm going to get all the readings for the last two years and see what they look like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I've done some number crunching and this is how my usage looks from April 2012. mr =meter reader, cr = customer reading and e = estimated

 

date reading usage

23/04/2012 mr 0

17/05/2012 mr 270 270

17/08/2012 e 1124 854

12/10/2012 cr 2274 1150

12/11/2012 mr 3039 765

31/01/2013 e 4458 1419

12/02/2013 mr 4672 214

31/05/2013 e 6150 1478

29/08/2013 e 7300 1150

10/12/2013 e 9120 1820

08/01/2014 cr 12865 3745

 

So the last proper reading was Feb 13, is there anyway I could have possibly used that much more extra electricity in 11 months?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind the weather in 2013

1. 4th Coldest March since 1910

2. Easter Sunday, March 31 was confirmed by the Met Office as the coldest Easter day on record

3. cold east wind continuous from February to early April

 

 

If you used electric heating during this period then your usage would have been a great deal higher than the previous year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure, though I might be wrong, that we were still using calor gas for the heating at the beginning of the year but at £130 for two bottles that only last 3 weeks we stopped using them. You could be right though and thats whats bumped the bill up, still surprised by how much though.

 

Ok its looking more and more that the bill may be correct and if so I do owe BG that amount which I have no problem with. My concern is that I can't afford to pay it back in one lump sum and also can't afford the DD payments they've asked for as mentioned in my first post. If I am paying them what I can afford i.e.£120 a month can they still force a pay meter on me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...