Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have also found this:  D.2 Service of a PCN by post: 54) There are some circumstances in which a PCN (under Regulation 10) may be served by post: 1) where the contravention has been detected on the basis of evidence from an approved device (approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances) 2) if the CEO has been prevented, for example by force, threats of force, obstruction or violence, from serving the PCN either by affixing it to the vehicle or by giving it to the person who appears to be in charge of that vehicle 3) if the CEO had started to issue the PCN but did not have enough time to finish or serve it before the vehicle was driven away and would otherwise have to write off or cancel the PCN 55) In any of these circumstances a PCN is served by post to the owner and also acts as the NtO. The Secretary of State recommends that postal PCNs should be sent within 14 days of the contravention. Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations. This from London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The question is what is an approved device? Certainly, he had the opportunity to place the ticket on my car and I didn't drive away.  I looked further and it seems that an approved device is a CCTV camera - It seems that the photos taken were not actual film but images and it is not clear if they are taken from a video or are stills. I'm guessing if it was moving images then the SAR would have stated this.    From the Borough of Hounslow website: "There are two types of PCN issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004, which governs parking contraventions. The first is served on-street by a Civil Enforcement Officer, who will observe a vehicle and collect evidence before serving the PCN either by placing it in a plastic wallet under the windscreen wiper, or by handing it to the driver. The second is a PCN served by post, based on CCTV footage taken by an approved device, which has been reviewed by a trained CCTV Operator."   From Legislation.gov.uk regarding approved devices: Approved Devices 4.  A device is an approved device for the purposes of these Regulations if it is of a type which has been certified by the Secretary of State as one which meets requirements specified in Schedule 1. SCHEDULE 1Specified requirements for approved devices 1.  The device must include a camera which is— (a)securely mounted on a vehicle, a building, a post or other structure, (b)mounted in such a position that vehicles in relation to which relevant road traffic contraventions are being committed can be surveyed by it, (c)connected by secure data links to a recording system, and (d)capable of producing in one or more pictures, a legible image or images of the vehicle in relation to which a relevant road traffic contravention was committed which show its registration mark and enough of its location to show the circumstances of the contravention. 2.  The device must include a recording system in which— (a)recordings are made automatically of the output from the camera or cameras surveying the vehicle and the place where a contravention is occurring, (b)there is used a secure and reliable recording method that records at a minimum rate of 5 frames per second, (c)each frame of all captured images is timed (in hours, minutes and seconds), dated and sequentially numbered automatically by means of a visual counter, and (d)where the device does not occupy a fixed location, it records the location from which it is being operated. 3.  The device and visual counter must— (a)be synchronised with a suitably independent national standard clock; and (b)be accurate within plus or minus 10 seconds over a 14-day period and re-synchronised to the suitably independent national standard clock at least once during that period. 4.  Where the device includes a facility to print a still image, that image when printed must be endorsed with the time and date when the frame was captured and its unique number. 5.  Where the device can record spoken words or other audio data simultaneously with visual images, the device must include a means of verifying that, in any recording produced by it, the sound track is correctly synchronised with the visual image.
    • Hearing took place today.  Case dismissed with costs awarded. Neither UKPC or a representative turned up.  Apparently they messaged the court on 7 May asking for their case to be considered on paper.  Never informed me, which was criticised by the judge as not following procedure.  I was really annoyed as I would have preferred for the case to be thrown out before the hearing, or at least face them in court and see them squeal.   They are just playing a numbers game and hope you blink 1st!   Ended up having to change my flight, but  the costs awarded softens the blow. Was asked to confirm it was my signature on both the witness statement and supplementary statement.  Wasn't asked to read them, said she could see my arguments made and the signs were insufficient and no contract formed. Took maybe 10 mins in total.  Judge did most of the talking and was best for me just to keep quiet or confirm any statements made. Happy to have won as a matter of principle and have costs awarded. Maybe not worth all the time and hassle for any newbies or the technologically challenged.  But if you are stubborn like me and willing to put in the time and effort, you can beat these vultures! I big shout out to everyone who helped on the thread with their advice and guidance, special mention to FTMDave, thank you sir!  Really appreciate everyone's efforts. All the best!
    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
    • There is no evidence that I was issued a PCN that was placed on the car and removed. It seems that I was issued a £60 PCN on the 8th of March (the parking date) but it was never placed on my car, instead,  they allege that they posted the PCN on the 13th of March and deemed delivered on the 15th. I never got this 1st £60 PCN demand. I only know about all of this through the SAR. I only received the second PCN demanding £100, which was deemed delivered on 16/04/2024 - that is 39 days after the parking incident.  I did a little research and "Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations." as per London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The main issue is that I was not aware of the 1st £60 PCN as I didn't receive it - I'm not sure how this relates to the 28-day rule because that rule applies to the initial £60 PCN. PCM could say that "we sent him the letter by post and it was deemed delivered on the 15th of March" therefore the 28-day rule does not apply.  As regards the safety of the parking attendant, that is clearly something he chose to feel and he made the decision that his safety was threatened - I didn't even see him or had any interaction with him. I'm nearly 50 and I definitely don't look aggressive 😊  
    • okay will do. I'll let you know if anything transpires but once again - many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hastings Direct Car insurance took money from mums card without permission


bloodline67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3783 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Just thought I'd share my recent experience that I had with Hastings Direct car insurance.

 

I took the insurance out about 6 months ago and my mum kindly lent us the money on her debit card to pay the initial fee as we were a little short on cash,

 

I then set up the direct debit with my account details for the monthly payments.

This has all been going well until last week.

 

November was a tough month for us and so we couldn't afford to pay the DD on the due date but would have the money about a week later,

I had the usual email/letter for Hastings about the late DD payment and so phoned them up to explain that I could pay them in two days time,

the chap I spoke to looked into this and then said

 

"O don't worry we've attempted to take it again and been successful,

if the system cant take the DD first time it tries again a few days later".

 

I knew there was a bit of money in the account for food shopping and resigned myself to the fact they we wouldn't be able to get that much shopping that night,

and thought that was the end of the matter.

 

Imagine my surprise then when last week my Mum phoned me asking why Hastings Direct had taken money out of here account last month.

 

I phoned them up and asked them to explain why they had taken an unauthorized payment from my Mothers account

and was told according to the T&C's if a monthly DD payment was not paid they will attempt to take it from the card that the original payment was made from.

 

I was not aware of this in the T&C's but accepted the fact that I should have read them more carefully

but explained that in the previous call I was told that my DD payment had been successful

and that there was no mention that it had come from my Mothers card.

 

The answer I was then given was unbelievable,

 

"we don't need to tell you where the payment was taken from".

 

I then tried to explain that when I had previously phoned it had been about my DD,

as the call centered on the DD and nothing else I assumed as would most people that when I was told the payment was successful it referred to the DD,

 

once again I was told they didn't have to tell me where the payment had come from,

in fact the person I was speaking to was coming over very arrogant and unsympathetic

I asked to speak to his line manager.

 

To cut a long story short the line manager said the same thing all though she was very sympathetic,

explained that I should have been told where the payment had come from

and then refunded my Mums money back to her account (meaning I now owe them the money just before Xmas)

and also sent me a cheque for £10 for the inconvenience.

 

She also removed my Mums card details from the system.

 

the moral of this story is if you use a different card for the initial payment once its gone through get it removed from the system,

never assume anything when phoning Hastings Direct no matter how obvious the subject may be

and from a personal point of view be very wary of using Hastings Direct as an insurance company.

 

I will never use them again and may in fact cancel my policy with them even though it would mean paying a fee.

 

Shocking company with a shocking customer care center.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

The Hastings rep is usually here every day, I'm sure he will answer you when he sees the thread.

 

Would it be possible for you to edit some paragraphs into your post to make it easier to read please? You should get more advice that way.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hastings are not allowed to do this in regard to a third party mandate. It is against the rules that they signed up with the company that processes the payments and is probably also against FCA rules. When any policyholder uses a third parties payment details, the Insurers should obtain the consent of the third party in regard to the payment they are making and also to authorise any subsequent payments. Normally they should send a separate letter to the third party to confirm that they have maintained their payment instruction and to give them notice of any further payments.

 

Sounds like Hastings accounts staff need some retraining, otherwise they risk getting into problems with their regulator, as well as the people that handle their payments.

 

Your Mum can ask her bank to reject the payment, as she did not authorise it. Her bank has to do this. You can then make arrangements with Hastings to pay the missing payment. I think Hastings do owe some form of compensation for their mistake.

 

Hopefully the Hastings rep will sort this out and also provide feedback to their compliance managers about what has happened.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, I had split it into paragraphs but when I posted it had been all merged into one big paragraph. I've just gone in to try and fix it but every time it comes out the same, any suggestions?

 

It looks OK now. :) If you have problems in the future, you could try pressing the Return button twice. There's also something like

that you can type, but I can't remember the exact format.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hastings are not allowed to do this in regard to a third party mandate. It is against the rules that they signed up with the company that processes the payments and is probably also against FCA rules. When any policyholder uses a third parties payment details, the Insurers should obtain the consent of the third party in regard to the payment they are making and also to authorise any subsequent payments. Normally they should send a separate letter to the third party to confirm that they have maintained their payment instruction and to give them notice of any further payments.

 

Sounds like Hastings accounts staff need some retraining, otherwise they risk getting into problems with their regulator, as well as the people that handle their payments.

 

Your Mum can ask her bank to reject the payment, as she did not authorise it. Her bank has to do this. You can then make arrangements with Hastings to pay the missing payment. I think Hastings do owe some form of compensation for their mistake.

 

Hopefully the Hastings rep will sort this out and also provide feedback to their compliance managers about what has happened.

 

I have to agree, I can't believe they can take money like that. It will be interesting to see if the Hastings Rep responds to this post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kwik fit did this to me once. I paid a payment on my boyfriends car insurance just the once (i owed him some money so volunteered to make the payment for him). I telephoned Kwik Fit, told them the card was a 1 off payment and that they were to take no further payments from my card. 6 months later they took £120 off my card without warning, I phoned my bank who said this company had been trying to take various amounts out over the past few weeks so I had my card cancelled after I withdrew the remaining money from my account. 4 of my standing orders were returned including 1 for my council tax and the bank charged me £15 each for those so I was not happy.

 

When my boyfriend discovered it was Kwik Fit later that day he got straight on the phone to them then passed them onto me. I demanded the £120 they stole, the £60 worth of bank charges I incurred as well as compensation for the week I had no access to money in my account as I was waiting for a new card. Once they listened to the original call they refunded the money they had taken, my bank charges and compensation.

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree, I can't believe they can take money like that. It will be interesting to see if the Hastings Rep responds to this post.

 

Hi bloodline67, Thank you for taking the time to post. We are very sorry for the delayed response. Can you please contact us directly by email and provide the relevant policy details and we will ensure that this matter is addressed urgently. [email protected] Many Thanks, Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thought I'd update you all on how things have progressed.

 

In short no change. Hastings Direct are unwilling to budge from there initial decision. As far as they are concerned as its stated in the their T&C and that they also stated it in a letter they sent me (which I don't recall) they can take money from a third parties debit/credit card.

 

The only new thing I've learned is that their response times to emails is terrible, even though I was promised a reply before Xmas I didn't receive one and I had to keep chasing to finally get a reply. I would like to say though that Jaime on here was very good in replying and I do thank him for trying to sort out this problem for me.

 

I currently still don't have the money to pay the £41 that I owe, this includes the £20 late payment penalty, so it looks like I will have to take the car off the road until I get paid. I am then going to get insurance with another company, I would rather pay the £55 cancellation fee plus the initial fee to the new company then carry on with Hastings Direct, will Hastings Direct be bothered? Not in the slightest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should ask Hastings Direct for their final response so that you can now go straight to the FOS. If it goes to the FOS, it will cost HD a £500 case fee and you nothing. For this reason, HD may want to come to a solution you are happy with.

 

It takes 5 minutes to make a complaint to the FOS and they will do the rest. It is a no brainer.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/complaints.htm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should ask Hastings Direct for their final response so that you can now go straight to the FOS. If it goes to the FOS, it will cost HD a £500 case fee and you nothing. For this reason, HD may want to come to a solution you are happy with.

 

It takes 5 minutes to make a complaint to the FOS and they will do the rest. It is a no brainer.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/complaints.htm

 

Thanks for the advice unclebulgaria67, I have had in the email a copy of the letter they sent to me and from what I can gather it is the final response from Hastings Direct. At the end of it they have even said if I remain dissatisfied I can refer the matter to the FOS and they have even given me the contact details, so as I said in my previous post they really don't seem to care one way or another.

I'm not even sure if it would be worth pursuing because as their letter states it was in their T&C's and that they also notified me by letter where the payment would come from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice unclebulgaria67, I have had in the email a copy of the letter they sent to me and from what I can gather it is the final response from Hastings Direct. At the end of it they have even said if I remain dissatisfied I can refer the matter to the FOS and they have even given me the contact details, so as I said in my previous post they really don't seem to care one way or another.

I'm not even sure if it would be worth pursuing because as their letter states it was in their T&C's and that they also notified me by letter where the payment would come from.

 

HD are in the wrong. They needed a third party mandate and to have advised the third party before they debited the money.

 

Up to you really. You appear to be defeatist. The problem is that if people don't complaint, HD will get a way with doing this again and again. They will tell everyone that it is in their t&c's, even if their procedures are wrong.

 

I think you stand a good chance with the FOS.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

HD are in the wrong. They needed a third party mandate and to have advised the third party before they debited the money.

 

Up to you really. You appear to be defeatist. The problem is that if people don't complaint, HD will get away with doing this again and again. They will tell everyone that it is in their t&c's, even if their procedures are wrong.

 

I think you stand a good chance with the FOS.

 

Didn't mean to sound defeatist, its just these things start to wear you down after a while. Your right if people don't take these things further then companies like HD will carry on getting away with it.

 

With that in mind I'm going to take your advice and complain to the FOS, as you said what have I got to lose. I will contact HD first to confirm that the letter I have received is their final response and then use the link you've provided.

 

Let the battle begin :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bloodline67, I can confirm that the attachment in the email is the final response from our Customer Relations team. I am sorry that you remain unhappy with the decision provided, please let me know if there is anything further that you require and please keep this thread updated with your progress. Many Thanks, Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bloodline67, I can confirm that the attachment in the email is the final response from our Customer Relations team. I am sorry that you remain unhappy with the decision provided, please let me know if there is anything further that you require and please keep this thread updated with your progress. Many Thanks, Jamie

 

Thank you again Jaime for your quick response and I will keep the thread updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do some reading concerning the way Insurance companies have to handle payments to third party accounts. The FCA have rules that apply and in my opinion HD appear to have breached these.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/cpa-principles/#.Usqo0LTmWy8

 

http://www.fca.org.uk/static/documents/payment-services-approach.pdf

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do some reading concerning the way Insurance companies have to handle payments to third party accounts. The FCA have rules that apply and in my opinion HD appear to have breached these.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/cpa-principles/#.Usqo0LTmWy8

 

http://www.fca.org.uk/static/documents/payment-services-approach.pdf

 

WOW thats a lot of info in the second link and to be honest couldn't really get my head round any of it.

 

I'm starting to fill out the FOS form and have got to the bit where I need to explain what my complaint is. On my first attempt I ran out of room as the text box seems to have a limit on it and so now I'm a bit unsure of what I need to write, I want to cover the details of the complaint without leaving out any important details but also don't want to fill it up with rubbish. Any help on how and what I should put down would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW thats a lot of info in the second link and to be honest couldn't really get my head round any of it.

 

I'm starting to fill out the FOS form and have got to the bit where I need to explain what my complaint is. On my first attempt I ran out of room as the text box seems to have a limit on it and so now I'm a bit unsure of what I need to write, I want to cover the details of the complaint without leaving out any important details but also don't want to fill it up with rubbish. Any help on how and what I should put down would be gratefully received.

 

You can phone the FOS as well and they will type all the details up. I think the complaint just needs to contain the basics and the FOS will ask you to send in further details later.

 

The FOS will also write to HD for their details, so I would not worry too much about you not providing all the information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...