Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help DWP chasing 13 year Old Debt


Mark71
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3634 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

Am hoping someone can help or advice me how I should handle this.

In June 2004 I received a letter demanding payment from a collection agency for the amount of £638 on behalf of DWP (Department of work and Pensions) relating to overpaid income support.

I was shock and astonished by this and immediately called DWP for more information about when I was over paid the Income support as stated.

They told me that the overpayment related to claims I was making during the period of May 1993 to October 1993 or there about. (I have no reconciliation of this)

I then wrote a letter to DWP outlining that I was not notified of this overpayment and because of this they have deprived me of the right to appeal and giving the time that has passed how they expected me to keep records of my own dating back to that period.

After writing my first letter in July 2004 I, I did not receive any reply and I considered the case closed. Now in October 2006 I have now received another letter from a different collection agency requesting payment regarding this same matter.

Before I loss my patience and say things I shouldn’t, I was hoping someone can tell me the right way I should go about this to ensure this matter is properly put to bed!

I am happy to have this case heard out in some sort of tribunal or even in court, but I don’t want the bailiffs knocking my door before it gets that far.

Can someone please let me know your thoughts on what my next and best course of action should be.

Looking forward to hear any comments.

Thanks

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The debt is too old to collect on and they will know that.

Write a brief letter explaining that as the debt is so old, it has become

unenforceable in Law. A further attempt by you to chase for this amount may

lead to me instituting a charge of harassment.

 

FUrthermore, under the guidelines issued by the Office of Fair Trading on Debt

Collection Practices, this is what they had to say about this practice of yours-

 

"debtors should not be led or allowed to believe that they are legally liable to pay

such charges where this is not the case. Failure to act in accordance with these

principles is likely to be regarded by the Office as an unfair or improper business

practice within section 25(2)(d) of the

Consumer Credit Act and thus relevant to the issue of fitness to hold a consumer credit licence."

 

And you could end with something like "I trust this will end communication between us."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this letter and forget about it.

 

The Loan Company

Company House,

Church Street,

Newtown,

Kent,

R1 7HG

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statue barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going to use Andy's letter, you will need to change some of the wording

since you knew nothing of this debt until last year, and therefore have never made

any payments towards it.

 

So you will need to amend this

 

The last payment of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

To something like this-

 

I have never acknowledged the debt so unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me to recover the alleged amount claimed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lookinforinfo and Handyandy,

 

Thank you very much for your advise, I have written a new letter including all the information you gave me and will be sending it today via recorded delivery.

 

I the first letter I wrote to them I did state about the Statue of Limitations, but I was not knoledgable enough to expand on it as you have done.

 

Your advise has lefted a huge weight off my shoulders.

 

Thank you very much.

 

I will let you know the outcome.

 

Mark!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

It dont seem like this has gone away :(

 

I received another letter yesterday from the debt agency. I decided to call them to advise them about the Letter I sent to Department of Work And Pensions, and the person on the other side told me that he was advised by DWP to continue to chase the debt. He also said as this is a goverment debt, the Statue of Limitations does not apply. (can someone confirm if this is right?)

 

I was thinking of forwarding the letter on to the Debt recovery company. Do you think that this is worth doing?

 

Also how do I enforce the harassment regualtion contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970?

 

Any advice would be highly appreciated.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, i think I found my own answer, in a posting from MCUH.

 

On the National Debt Line it states;

 

Benefit Overpayments & Social Fund Loans

 

The Department of Work & Pensions (DWP) has 6 years to take action through the courts to recover benefit overpayments and social fund loans. This time starts running from the date of the final decision made on the overpayment and from when the social fund loan was due to be paid. But the DWP are still allowed to make deductions from your benefit for a debt over 6 years old as they don’t need to go to court to do this. This applies to overpayments of benefits such as income support, job seekers allowance, pension credit, housing benefit, council tax benefit and paying back social fund loans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The gobvernment is subject to th erule of Law as are we all. That is why there is a statute of limitations on parking fines of 3 years. However, in cases such as fraud,

there is no time limit.

 

Here the critical time is when the DWP noticed their error and wrote to you. I am

bound to say that in the unlikely event of them not discovering the overpayment

until after 2000, that it appears inequitable that the statute of limitations should

start from that time. After all, the ability to reclaim the money legally had already

passed. And even if they didn't discover it until 2000, unless it was late on in the

year, the statute of limitations has been passed again anyway.

 

It is a pity that you only got the dca to admit over the phone that government

are not subject to the statute of limitations, nor that they confirmed that the

Dwp had insisted that the debt should be pursued- another advantage of keeping

all contact by letter.

 

You now need to write to the dca confirming that the DWP are subject to the statute of limitations and that to continue to chase you is a gross breach of the

Consumer Credit Act section 25 [2][d] in view of the time lapse, and their

continued efforts to recover an amount that is legally unenforceable. In

addition, they are in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998 article 8

protocol 1. Send a copy to the OFT with a strong complaint.

 

Then write to the DWP, pointing out that you have been advised by the dca

that they have been exhorted by the DWP to pursue a 13 year old debt despite

the statute of limitations having come into effect 7 years ago. The department

is too well versed in law not to be unaware that by attempting to instigate

proceedings against you is a gross misuse of their powers. You expect a letter

by return confirming that all proceedings against you will cease, and the dca

cancelled. Failure to do so will result in a complaint to the OFT as you are

already in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 25[2][d] and the Human Rights Act 1998 article 8 protocol 1. [incidentally Mark, it is possible to obtain legal aid for

pursuing them on human rights].

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi

 

I have a friend that works for DWP and was told that they have to chase the debt but if you just keep refusing to pay they will eventually just give up, he says sometimes in his mind he just wants to shout dont pay but he is monitored so cannot give any indication to the caller. Hope this helps.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are no longer on benefit and have received a demand for payment, it can be recovered by proceedings in the county court. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) must apply to court within six years of its decision on the amount of the overpayment.

 

It seems like the demand was made in 2004 for the payment, so under s9 of the limitation's act they would have until 2010 before the debt is stat barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...

I'm having exactly the same problem but its now gone one stage further, its now been passed to a debt collection agency who are saying the 6 year rule doesn't apply to government debts.

 

Anyone offer me some advice?

 

The overpayment was made in 1995 and they contacted me again in about 2004.

 

I was meant to start paying them back in 1996ish but was made redundant and recieved a letter from them saying i didn't need to pay it back while i was on benifits and they would contact me when i had to start paying. That was the last i heard from them for about 7 years. I was even told by operatives at the DWP that they could only make me pay it back if i went back on benefits.

 

Any suggestions? Its for £480.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi

 

in 1999 - 2003 i was on income support, i think it was in 2001 i borrowed a loan from dwp. I have been working since 2003-2004 and still working. i recieved a letter from DWP yesterday demanding £580 or they were going to pass it on to dept collectors.

 

i cant remember whether i paid it back or not a certainly would have proof of it.

 

can they demand this money back??

 

help

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR them write to the office who sent u the letter with a SAR request that should tell u everything remember to add your NINO.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have a friend that works for DWP and was told that they have to chase the debt but if you just keep refusing to pay they will eventually just give up, he says sometimes in his mind he just wants to shout dont pay but he is monitored so cannot give any indication to the caller. Hope this helps.....

 

Hi I`m sorry if I`m not doing this right but i`ve never used a forum before. My father passed away on 19/12/08 my mother has just received a letter from the DWP saying that my father was overpaid £1778.42 on these dates 10/02/94 till 26/07/96 and 26/01/99 till 24/05/99 they want to reclaim this money from his estate. Obviously I can`t ask my father if this is correct, my mother is a 74 year old disabled woman who is now sick with worry that she has to pay this back, could someone please advise me if she has to pay this money back or if the limitation act applies to her situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The tread says that you cannot be pursued after a certain period for a debt - but that the DWP - CAN - deduct overpayments if you are receiving benefits after ANY period. If that is correct - can the DWP be stopped? Or is it the case that the Statute of Limitations does NOT apply to them. Also I have a letter saying I owe money but no info about WHY (other than a catchall ie 'overpayment'..) My case - dates back to 1994. Having recently recieved IS because My partner abandoned the family home - THE FIRST thing I got - weeks before any benefit payment was a DEMAND for this overpayment! (from 1994).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...