Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm sending back to plea guilty and not appear in court. Nothing to add really. Then complete the form where it ask for my finances, monthly income, employment status and monthly out goings.  
    • What we need to see is all the original paperwork  That would include the pre contract information and the original HP Agreement  Post it up and I will have a good look over it at the weekend  It really hangs on the wording as to whether it’s a scrapage adjustment /discount on the price of the car( that is how some schemes worked) Every manufacturer had their own version  Have you sent VW a SAR?
    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old Capital One debt - not sure how to handle it.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We've been getting letters from Debt Managers (Services) Ltd. This relates to an old debt my wife had with Capital One which currently stands at £1691.05. She had been paying just £5 per month via direct debit but cancelled it in May because she thought it had been paid off. She'd received no statement from Capquest so had no idea where she stood with the debt. I don't think she realised just how big her credit card debt had been.

 

I know that the debt itself is more than 6 years old now but as she had been paying it off I'm not sure where the law stands on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread move to General Debt Collection

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

The date when it becomes statute barred is six years from the last acknowledgment of the debt or the last payment, so that won't help here.

 

You can write to Capital One asking for a copy of the alleged credit agreement and we can see what they come up with.

 

When was the card first taken out?

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, good ole creditors shirking their responsibilities and hoping to get away with it!

 

Does she have a history of these payments herself? Bank statements?

 

You may find you need to submit a SAR £10 in order to get the information THEY should have been sending annually whilst the payment plan was in place.

However, as they havent done so, it would suggest to me that they have been adding interest and perhaps charges on this, so the balance was never beng reduced at all.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your OH can check her bank statements as far back as she can to see what she may have paid then that will be a good start,

failing that then a SAR to the Original Creditor (OC) will be the best way forward.

In the mean time, any and all payments should STOP.... don't want to throw good money after bad!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check credit reference files. When did your partner start the reduced payments?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mention Capquest, but only in passing. Capital One use them as a DCA but they are better known on this forum as a debt purchaser.

In what capacity are they acting here? If they purchased the debt, CQ will have sent you a letter of assignment from themselves and one pretending to be from C1.

Don't be alarmed at Debt Managers' spineless threats, including letters they send out purporting to be from Russel Aitken solicitors. Peeps here will advise what you can do.

That said, I find it curious to stop paying a debt just because you think it must be repaid without attempting to obtain a statement of account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mention Capquest, but only in passing. Capital One use them as a DCA but they are better known on this forum as a debt purchaser.

In what capacity are they acting here? If they purchased the debt, CQ will have sent you a letter of assignment from themselves and one pretending to be from C1.

Don't be alarmed at Debt Managers' spineless threats, including letters they send out purporting to be from Russel Aitken solicitors. Peeps here will advise what you can do.

That said, I find it curious to stop paying a debt just because you think it must be repaid without attempting to obtain a statement of account.

 

 

It has been known many times that a DCA won't tell you when the debt is fully paid and continue taking the profit. Getting it back is very hard (but not impossible).

 

I would imagine that doing some simple calculations would suffice in working out what was (or was not) owed however, I agree that it would have been better to demand a statement considering that the DCA should have been sending one annually.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...