Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Top Up Payment removed after becoming income based?


Between
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3848 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if anyone can help me. I don't know if what's happened is right.

 

I used to be on Incapacity Benefit and when I moved to ESA Contributory Benefit I got a top up payment (£11.70 a week). Now I've moved from Contributory ESA to Income Related ESA and the top up has been removed.

 

All the information I got about the top up payment (also called a Transitionary Allowance) was that you got it until the ESA was slowly increased over time, but your money stayed the same until the two met in the middle. But now it's gone.

 

The letter I got said I'm getting £100.15 a week on ESA but the page for how they calculate this says I'm getting a top up payment and I'm getting £110.85.

 

I phoned the number on the letter twice. The first time noone in the office knew if the top up payment going was correct or not but told me to assume it was. They said I should appeal but the letter says I have to have Mandatory Reconsideration first and they didn't know anything about that.

 

I phoned a local advice shop but they didn't know about the Top Up payment and I phoned the benefit people again. This time I was told going from Contributions to Income Related meant I'd had a reconsideration and it was removed because of that.

 

Is this right?

 

Nothing I can find online says going from Contributory to Income Related ESA makes you lose your Top Up payment.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think OP and alot of other people are in the same boat and Do loose the Transition Allowance...

 

http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/how-we-can-help/benefits-information/incapacity-benefits-migration

 

is the way I read it in the above link.

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies,

 

I still don't understand where it says that a person will lose their Top Up payment after moving to income related ESA. I can see it says:

 

"where people who are eligible for ESA receive more on existing incapacity benefits than the appropriate ESA rate, their existing rate of benefit will be frozen at the point of conversion"

 

from the link you gave: http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/how-we-can-help/benefits-information/incapacity-benefits-migration

 

but can't see about losing the Top Up payment. Is there a bit I'm missing?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, from what I understand, transitional allowance is only paid as part of a contributions based claim.

 

I got this from a neighbour who is in the same boat as OP .

 

The £11.70 you are talking about was part of Invalidity Allowance age related ,paid to people on IB depending on how long they had been receiving that benefit for !

 

The Transitional payment was only paid for 365 days while on ESA CB

 

Invalidity Allowance "Transitional"

HR 13.80 to 11.70

MR 7.10 to 5.90

LR 5.60 to 5.90

 

As your on ESA IR It is not paid any more.

 

I think CAG user "Starryeyes52" may be able to throw some more light on this.....

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

: :evil: Transitional Additions Or Lack Of :evil: :

 

Appear to be another grey area that the ComDems have kept quiet about in the rush for welfare reform that time limited, to three hundred and sixty five days, contributions flavoured employment n support allowance with the work related activity component.

 

So far as I can find, there's nothing in the Decision Makers Guide or the adviser guidance, but there's several threads on Rightsnet. Consensus of opinion seems to be that Work n Pensions procedure is;

 

There's some exceptions, but the end of contributions flavour employment n support payments often terminates a transitional addition,

 

Or, transitional protection ends anyway cos the change of income constitutes a change of circumstances,

 

Despite a pre 2012 statement that, 'The transitional addition will terminate when ESA entitlement itself terminates.'

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/245376/ib-reassessment-transitional.pdf

(Page 3)

 

 

Some claimants (who've conversion awards from incapacity benefit and income support) get two separate transitional additions. One for each flavour of employment n support allowance.

 

And yes, the £11.70 (at 2012 rates) is the highest rate age addition added to incapacity benefit (and before that it was the invalidity allowance part of invalidity benefit). Age additions and allowances from legacy benefits are the commonest reason for transitional additions to conversion awards of employment n support allowance from incapacity benefit.

 

Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

:Between:

 

Work n Pensions procedure seems to be that someone who claims income flavoured payments of employment n support, following three hundred and sixty five days of contribution flavoured payments, loses the transitional addition that was attached to the contributory award.

 

There's no definitive Government guidance on the internet that I know of. If anyone's found some, please share. You can read the Rightsnet discussions (click discussion then go down the ESA threads) about the issue at;

 

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/

 

Doubt there's been a reconsideration on this. It isn't part of the transfer process. And decisions aren't reconsidered before they're notified to the claimant either!

 

Mandatory reconsideration is the first part of the new process to dispute a Work n Pensions decision made on or after 28 October 13;

 

https://www.gov.uk/appeal-benefit/decisions-made-on-after-28-october-13

 

A nonsense letter and poorly trained contact centre staff? Par for the course!

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone,

 

I really appreciate you taking the time to find out the information for me. Even though I'm losing it at least I can now know for sure that's what should be happening and it's not a mistake I have to get them to sort out.

 

I keep getting less money from things the government never publicise.

 

I had to move flat because I rent and the old one was being sold. So my housing benefit got recalculated and I got a lower amount even though my new rent was higher, because there were new rules and me moving meant a change in circumstances (even though I had no choice but move).

 

Then my housing benefit went down again earlier this year because my Top Up payment was seen as having extra money. At least I will get that amount back on my housing benefit now. At least I hope I will, I was told once that they only recalculate it once a year now.

 

I hate all the underhand ways they take money away from everyone.

 

I'm just going to concentrate on keeping getting better. I hope to be well enough to look for work in 6 months.

 

Thanks again for all your help, it's much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-D

Thanks everyone,

 

I really appreciate you taking the time to find out the information for me. Even though I'm losing it at least I can now know for sure that's what should be happening and it's not a mistake I have to get them to sort out.

 

I keep getting less money from things the government never publicise.

 

I had to move flat because I rent and the old one was being sold. So my housing benefit got recalculated and I got a lower amount even though my new rent was higher, because there were new rules and me moving meant a change in circumstances (even though I had no choice but move).

 

Then my housing benefit went down again earlier this year because my Top Up payment was seen as having extra money. At least I will get that amount back on my housing benefit now. At least I hope I will, I was told once that they only recalculate it once a year now.

 

I hate all the underhand ways they take money away from everyone.

 

I'm just going to concentrate on keeping getting better. I hope to be well enough to look for work in 6 months.

 

Thanks again for all your help, it's much appreciated.

 

You could ask the council to check your HB claim again,to make sure your getting the correct amount or ask CAB/Welfare rights to check.

 

It's not the 1st time councils have been known to drop a clanger when it comes to HB claims !

 

Good luck...

1aK+F4PJ7cBm32CUNiyI2GAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...