Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

fredrickson and lowell - o2 'debt'


Ktlin
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

please help ,

 

l desputed my bill with o2 beginning of last year and they sold my debt to Lowell ,

l didn't receive any warnings about this except getting letters that l owe Lowell,

neither did l get a default and cancelation fee which l asked for in the first place when my phone was disconnected,

 

I have received a letter from fredrickson saying they are representing Lowell and they need me to pay or send me to court through bryan carter

 

l contacted o2 they told me the bill was correct and still lm disputing it ,

they then tell me if lm disputing the bill l call them

but for paying for the bill l pay Lowell,

 

am l right in thinking this bill doesn't belong to o2 anymore as they have said l pay it to Lowell

I am l eligible in paying the bill bearing in mind l already have a default in my credit file,

can bryan carter take me to court for this, ?

 

I haven't paid them a penny and have not responded to Lowell's letters except when l received this one last week from fredrickson

saying if l don't pay they will instruct bryan carter their solicitors

 

l then contacted o2 to find out why they had sold my bill and that l was still not agreeing with the charges and no one seemed to want to help me

 

how is Lowell, fredrickson, bryan carter related as l am not getting how this is becoming a string

 

here is the ;letter l wrote to fredrickson this letter

 

 

Dear Fredrickson,

Accountno: (number)

You havecontacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which youclaim is owed by myself.

I wouldpoint out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to lowell.

I am familiarwith the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that itunfair to send demands

for payment to an individual when it is uncertain thatthey are the debtor in question.

I wouldalso point out that the OFT says under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursuethird parties for payment when they are not liable.

In not ceasing collectionactivity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you areusing deceptive/and or unfair methods.

Furthermoreignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or aredisputed

and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts tophysical/psychological harassment.

I wouldask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you canprovide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

I awaityour written confirmation that this matter is now closed.

Otherwise I will haveno option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department andconsider informing the OFT of your actions.

I/we lookforward to your reply.

Yourssincerely,

 

 

was this right ?

but whats next ?

can they still come back with something l cant handle ?

please help me to deal with these people

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fredrickson these days ARE Lowell...

 

Also, i like the letter, however how much is it for?

 

One step at the time, give us more info here.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fredrickson these days ARE Lowell...

 

Also, i like the letter, however how much is it for?

 

One step at the time, give us more info here.

 

It is £541

For me l think it shouldn't be more than £320 that's including cancelation they final offered me after stringing me for months and charging me for phone that was disconnected

Link to post
Share on other sites

be careful they will issue a claim form or an sd.

 

what was you dispute

 

why sis you stop paying o2

 

tell us the story.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX is right, Lowell are getting more Litigious as every day goes on.

If they do then the key part to this story will be your disputing the bill with O2.

 

So any further info is great here....

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone accounts are not credit agreement regulated by CCA 1974, default notices are not required.

 

If you want to take this write to Ronan Dunne CEO Telefonica Uk , response is usually swift.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have received letters of assignment from Lowell as well as O2 if the account has been sold to them .Ask O2 for confirmation of that.

 

If Lowell have bought the account it would be them who instructed BC, not Fred. This sounds more like instruction as DCA rather than debt sale

 

You should definitely dispute the bill with O2, but give us more details so that we can help

Link to post
Share on other sites

To get a response from O2 write to Ronan Donne CEO of Telefonica UK the full address is on a very recent O2 thread.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone accounts are not credit agreement regulated by CCA 1974, default notices are not required.

 

If you want to take this write to Ronan Dunne CEO Telefonica Uk , response is usually swift.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

please explain what do you mean phone accounts are not credit agreement regulated by CCA 1974

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly that.

 

 

they are not credit so are not covered by the consumer credit act

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have received letters of assignment from Lowell as well as O2 if the account has been sold to them .Ask O2 for confirmation of that.

 

If Lowell have bought the account it would be them who instructed BC, not Fred. This sounds more like instruction as DCA rather than debt sale

 

You should definitely dispute the bill with O2, but give us more details so that we can help

 

 

 

 

l did not receive any letter stating that they have sold my account ,

l received lots of letters stating they need the money paid and obviously l ignored them because l thought l was being played, then received a letter from fredrickson saying they represent Lowell and they would like the money paid they will instruct bryan carter to take me to court

it wasn't bryan carter who wrote the letter it was fredrickson they said they were representing Lowell,

when l talked to o2 they said l dispute with them the charges but paying l pay Lowell that's when l stated wondering why am l paying Lowell instead of o2 l never paid my bill and asked them to cancel my contract then 4months after they did and sent me a bill up to then and including cancellation fee

for me l know l owe about half of that with cancellation fee

 

o2 says l dispute with them but pay Lowell

my bill was for two months but lm charged for more, lm even charged internet that l never went over the limit no one sent me my bill even when l wanted it ,

please ask me what you want to know as lm not sure what else you would want to know thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly that.

 

 

they are not credit so are not covered by the consumer credit act

 

dx

 

 

so if they are not credit and not covered by consumer credit act how do they get to put default on my credit ,

can l make them take it off ? or are they allowed to place it

how do l deal with them , best way ?

explain to me in detail if they are not covered what does it mean for me or them

have l got any way of getting out of it ,?

to be honest l would have been happy paying the bill if someone had talked to me and sent me copies instead of being passed on and ignored , so l just thought l keep quite too

thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

its in their T&C's that they can fwd your details to cra 's.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so if they are not credit and not covered by consumer credit act how do they get to put default on my credit ,

can l make them take it off ? or are they allowed to place it

how do l deal with them , best way ?

explain to me in detail if they are not covered what does it mean for me or them

have l got any way of getting out of it ,?

to be honest l would have been happy paying the bill if someone had talked to me and sent me copies instead of being passed on and ignored , so l just thought l keep quite too

thanx

 

I only just seen this as I'm away for a few days.

 

In simple terms a mobile phone account is a service contract, payments do not include interest and are billed monthly in arrears.

 

There is no element of credit involved.

 

You will have signed a contract in store or electronically on line giving 'permission' for your data to be shared and passed to credit reference agencies.

 

From what you have said you ceased payments while you disputed the account which is totally the wrong approach, dealing with such matters on the phone usually proves pointless too.

 

O2s advice to raise a dispute (formal complaint in writing ) is good, a formal complaint must be fully investigated and a response made with in 56 days.

 

Lowell are a debt purchase company Fredrikson are now part of the same group and they are a debt collectors, Bryan Carter is a solicitor (for rent) used by many companies in the debt collection industry.

 

Reading through your post it seems to me that you have 'received a lot of letters' and chosen to ignore them, my guess is that on or two of those letters are notices of assignment.

 

I personally cannot see any reason for O2 to remove the default from what you have said, no I don't think you 'have any way of getting out of it'.

 

The only way forward is the formal complaint but I have a suspicion you will not like the answer!

 

As dx 100uk has said and so have I this is not a consumer credit matter, no default notice is required and the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as amended does not apply to this debt.

 

The default is correct stopping the payments is the cause of action, the action taken was to default the account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

l did not receive any letter stating that they have sold my account ,

l received lots of letters stating they need the money paid and obviously l ignored them because l thought l was being played, then received a letter from fredrickson saying they represent Lowell and they would like the money paid they will instruct bryan carter to take me to court

it wasn't bryan carter who wrote the letter it was fredrickson they said they were representing Lowell,

when l talked to o2 they said l dispute with them the charges but paying l pay Lowell that's when l stated wondering why am l paying Lowell instead of o2 l never paid my bill and asked them to cancel my contract then 4months after they did and sent me a bill up to then and including cancellation fee

for me l know l owe about half of that with cancellation fee

 

o2 says l dispute with them but pay Lowell

my bill was for two months but lm charged for more, lm even charged internet that l never went over the limit no one sent me my bill even when l wanted it ,

please ask me what you want to know as lm not sure what else you would want to know thanx

 

You should write to Lowell & O2 saying that you have not received any letters of assignment despite O2 saying that they have sold the account

 

You should also state that you dispute the amount claimed and that you require fully itemised bills for the amount that they are claiming

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...