Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Followed up with letter which is no surprise as I’m easy to find via electoral roll. Letter says we have been asked to recover from you on behalf f our client in Middle East x amount. if you believe you are not liable please contact us - yeah right! If you wish to make payment here are our client bank details which look genuine and relate directly to a Dubai bank. ” if you don’t engage our client may take further action” etc blah blah blah. its the same type phrases used by CWD/IDRWW/IDR etc…..   I ignored the email, blocked the text number and will wait to see if I receive any formal action via Mail but seems like the same tactic I’ve seen for 10 years plus and I’ve ignored all. just for people’s info
    • Hi. I expect the experts will be along later to advise you. In the meantime, I've amended your thread title to show the car park name and location. HB
    • i can instruct my gof to sit, but if it does is an entirely diff matter. WL are acting here as a DCA and are not the OWNER of the debt, lowells are, so jog on WL... until very very recent we've never seen lowells raise a scottish claim Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card. - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group  
    • Visiting scotland I came across a car park at The Falls of Shin operated by Civil Enforcement Limited. The car park requires visitors to pay using the awful Phone and Pay app or over the phone using an eqully terrible automated service. Their signs state a time limit of 10 minutes after arriving to pay, and both methods require needlessly lengthy registration process only for payment to be rejected when attempting to pay by both. The Cafe were able to offer us some assistance and register our vehicle so hopefully we sould avoid a fine but this seems like entrapment and would still stop us returning again. How is this legal without giving visitors the option to pay on site?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My TAXI nudged a fence - court papers ***Settled by ADR***


maybelate
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

notts complain ignore fake sols form until/if you get a real form.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

 

I received a claim form from Salford County Court today.

 

 

The claim is in the name of the person who's fence I hit and is dated tomorrow.

 

 

I think that I either need to prepare a defence or a part admission.

 

 

Can someone advise what would be the best thing for me to do please?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Honeybee, it's huge but here it is:

 

1. At all material times the claimant was the owner and occupier of a property at xxxxxx (the property)

2. On xxxxx the defendant lost control of the vehicle they were driving and caused damage to the property resulting in loss to the claimant and his insurers

3. the incident constitutes negligence. When driving, the defendant owed a duty of care to ensure that he was driving with reasonable skill and care. The defendant insured was in breach of that duty and as a result of that breach, damage was caused to the property.

4. the defendant is liable to the claimant in negligence.

 

particulars of negligence

 

the claimant repeats paragraphs 1-3 above

 

1) the damage was due to negligence by the defendant, whilst in control of a vehicle

2) by reason of the matters aforesaid the claimant has suffered loss and damage

 

Particulars of loss and damage

 

a. In indemnifying in respect of losses incurred, the claimant's insurers, xxxxx, have incurred loss and expense of £xxxxx that total being made up in the manner referred to in "POCI"

B. The claimant has suffered an uninsured loss in total of £xxxxx that total being the sum made up in the manner referred to in "POCI"

 

3) To the extent that xxxxx home claims have indemnified the claimant in respect of the losses that they have suffered it is subrogated to the claims of the claimant

 

4) the claimant has sought to recover the aforementioned sums by letters to the defendant. Notwithstanding the said invitation, the defendant has been unable to pay the said amounts or any sums in respect of the claimant's claim.

 

5) further the claimant is entitled to and claims interest on the aforesaid sums pursuant to section 69 of the county court act from xxxxx to xxxxx 2014 (xxx days) in the sum of £xxxxx at a daily rate of £xxxx.

 

AND the claimant claims:

 

i. Damages

ii. interest

iii. costs

iv. further or other relief

 

statement of truth

 

the claimant believed that the facts stated in these particulars of claim are true. I am authorised by the claimant to sign this statement of truth.

 

name xxxxxxxxxxx

signed xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

then there is another page entitled POC1 stating a description of the work that was claimed to be carried out on the fence and the cost and an amount for the policy excess

Link to post
Share on other sites

it might be best if scan up the claimform and the PoC1

 

 

REMOVE anything that I's you mind.

 

 

HOW TO UPLOAD DOCUMENTS / IMAGES ON CAG IMMEDIATELY YOU DO NOT NEED 10 POSTS

.

IMPORTANT To protect your IDENTITY and ensure you remain ANONYMOUS on CAG

YOU MUST ensure that you REMOVE all Personal Information including Barcodes, Names, Addresses etc

.

ENSURE: To leave all Monetary Figures and Dates.

.

DO NOT USE A BIRO, PEN, SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS TO EDIT THE INFORMATION

.

1. SCAN YOUR DOCUMENT

.

- Set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300 DPI (150 will do)

- Scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture (jpg) file

.

- Don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

.

- If you have multiple scans/pictures please put these into a WORD DOC first ensuring you have removed all Personal Information before converting to PDF.

.

- IPHONE ONLY: Take a picture and Convert to PDF via an APP

.

2. HOW TO EDIT (Remove Personal Information)

.

- Do this using MSPAINT.EXE or any Photo Editing program and ensure to save the document.

PLEASE TRY AND REFRAIN FROM POSTING FILES OF +1Mb in size

a single sheet of a4 should be about 50kb.

.

.

3. HOW TO CONVERT YOUR DOCUMENT TO PDF

.

- If you have OFFICE installed this has an installable PRINT to PDF option so use this and save as PDF.

- If you have PDF as an installed driver use this program and save as PDF.

.

OR Go to one of the many free online pdf converter websites:

.

- http://freejpgtopdf.com/

- http://www.convert-jpg-to-pdf.net/

- http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

- http://www.pdfmerge.com/

- http://www.primopdf.com/

.

PLEASE REMEMBER: It would be better to upload a Multi-page PDF rather than multiple Single PDFs.

.

4. BEFORE UPLOADING YOUR DOCUMENT ON CAG

.

- Logically Name your PDF File so Users know what it is. DO NOT NAME YOUR FILE USING BANK NAMES OR CAG IN THE TITLE

.

- For Example: Default Notice DDicon-MM-YYYY.

.

IMPORTANT To protect your IDENTITY and ensure you remain ANONYMOUS on CAG please ensure that you do a final check that all Personal Information including Barcodes, Names, Addresses etc. are REMOVED before carrying out the NEXT STEP

.

5. HOW TO UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT ON CAG

.

- In your Thread/Post open a new msg box here.

- Click 'Go Advanced' below the msg box.

- Click 'Manage Attachments' below that box.

- Click the 'Add Files' button on the top right.

- Click 'Select Files', navigate to your file(s) on your PC.

- Click 'Upload Files'.

.

- You DON’T have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box just upload it ……… JOB DONE

- You can click on your links to check them too!!

.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've banged the screen and sorted it

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like someone has banged the head of the paralegal that has drafted that PoC...negligence for what? Got a gold digger here that has been watching too much American TV.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dx :-)

 

I totally agree Andy, this started off as a very minor, very slow speed (in reverse) impact which caused damage to part of a wooden pane on an already rotten fence. Now they have it sounding like I went on a high speed rampage, and no-one in my path was safe :shock:

 

I need to prepare my defence Andy as I have to fight this as a matter of principle. I am and always have been prepared to pay for the minor amount of damage that I caused, so I assume that I have to say that I want to offer part payment when I submit the acknowledgement? and then for the defence do I just get all my evidence together (emails, photo's, letters etc.) and write what happened in my own words?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As pointed out by many other caggers, your best evidence is the set of pictures taken at the time of the incident.

This will inevitably show that the fence was not new and the damage was limited to the one or two panels.

Trying to get a brand new fence for a little hit is very cheeky.

I built a brand new 30ft fence before Christmas and painted it for £380 all in, and I made more than £200 for 12 hours work.

With the amount they are asking they will probably renovate the all fence.

Cheeky!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis you said u did y damage and the poc says you did x i would defend all and make no admissions.

 

Later in the process you could produce the evidence of y damage.

 

First let them jump through the hoops of proving their claim

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No partial admittance Maybelate...defend all..otherwise they will get judgment automatically.Do you know if LV have paid out on the claim?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok they would also need to itemise their costs.

 

Question.

Claiment is the owner.

IF they paid an insurance excess of 50 pound how can they tgen claim the amount of the work allegadly cost.

 

Shurly that part of the claim is down to the insurer and not the home owner thus no locus standi for the 200 odd quid?

 

Court listed is family court. You will want to put on directions questionnaire when it comes that you want small claims court. Also select yes to mediation. I would offer the 50 excess in mediation and thats it. And they would have to prove to me they actually paid it.

 

See what others say

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like someone has banged the head of the paralegal that has drafted that PoC... negligence for what? Got a gold digger here that has been watching too much American TV.

 

Not really. It's standard wording when suing under the tort of negligence.

 

At the end of the day the OP was negligent so the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim are correct.

 

If I was the OP I'd just pass the claim to his motor insurers to deal with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok they would also need to itemise their costs.

 

Question.

Claiment is the owner.

IF they paid an insurance excess of 50 pound how can they tgen claim the amount of the work allegadly cost.

 

Shurly that part of the claim is down to the insurer and not the home owner thus no locus standi for the 200 odd quid?

 

Court listed is family court. You will want to put on directions questionnaire when it comes that you want small claims court. Also select yes to mediation. I would offer the 50 excess in mediation and thats it. And they would have to prove to me they actually paid it.

 

See what others say

The Particulars of Claim explain that the insurers outlay is included as a subrogated loss so that argument is not going to go anywhere unfortunately.

 

The claim hasn't been issued in the "family Court", that's just the full name of Hereford County Court which I assume is the OP's local Court. It will be issued in the County Court and allocated to the Small Claims Track at the appropriate stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gany this all about 1 rotten fence panel...and the claimant having already claimed on their insurance and now looking to recover more......

 

Can you prove the OP was negligent ? Negligence is different in that the claimant must prove his loss, and a particular kind of loss, to recover.Emotional distress perhaps?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the betting that is £6,000 for the lawyer and 4 for the claimant.

 

 

Normally 5 for each of them but in this case an extra 1,000 for the lawyer because he thought of entering the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that the OP hit the fence panel is the negligent act.

 

There is a factual dispute as to the level of damage to the fence which the OP has the right to argue if he disagrees with it. The insurer has paid out to fix the fence and now seeks to recover the costs.

 

There is no claim for emotional distress from the fence owner based on the paperwork provided by the OP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the betting that is £6,000 for the lawyer and 4 for the claimant.

 

 

Normally 5 for each of them but in this case an extra 1,000 for the lawyer because he thought of entering the claim.

 

What do you mean? This is a small claim so no legal fees other than the £70.00 claimed.

 

The whole value of the claim is only £433.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" The insurer has paid out to fix the fence and now seeks to recover the costs. "

 

So why is the insured making the claim and not the insurer?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fence panels are £14 at B&Q Gany...its this type of culture that my initial post referred to...so why not just claim for the loss part 7 claim through MCOL?

 

This is very much your forte I appreciate that...but why was there a loss ? Why is it not just added to the next premium?And does this type of litigation not just ram up the costs in insurance?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...