Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I just found a couple abandoned traffic cones locally by some bins.   A bit squished but free!  So have placed them on the land.  Will wait to see if the cones get moved and signs ignored again this week before I consider rocks/ boulders.
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ill health retirement & termination of employment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have just been awarded partial ill health retirement backdated to end August 2013. I have now received a letter saying my employment will be terminated from the same date and I would receive any outstanding holiday pay.When I queried why I would not receive any notice pay and why there was no notification of my contract being terminated I was told that as I had requested to be considered for ill health retirement, I had effectively handed in my notice and would not be entitled to notice pay. I have been with this employer for 21 years. I would appreciate feedback as I have lost trust in my employer. If it's right then that's ok but I'm not convinced. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG. I'm sorry to hear about your problems.

 

While we're waiting for the forum guys to be able to get here, I think it might help to advise you if you could tell us whether your employer is public or private sector please.

 

It may or may not be relevant, but I'm confused about your reference to partial ill health retirement. Is it because you can't do the job you used to but could do other work, for example?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi honeybee13 I work in the private sector and yes they allege that I may be able to do some sort of work in the future. I don't believe I will as my condition will only deteriorate, however, I don't have the strength to argue this. The OH report was in my view ambiguous and I did write to dispute the findings to no avail. If I'm not due notice pay then that is fair enough but I now don't trust either my rep or management and just need another unbiased opinion. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talk us through the process you went through to be retired please. Step by step :)

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talk us through the process you went through to be retired please. Step by step :)

 

Hi I was diagnosed with PBC in 2011 and my symptoms impacted so much on my working life I eventually went off at end of August 2012

 

There was minimal contact from my employer, maybe 3 phone calls to"see how I was" until I was contacted to attend an OH meeting in July 2012. I was asked some questions however, the OH person informed me he knew all about PBC.

 

I was then invited to a meeting on 8/8 to discuss the report despite not having seen it until the day of the meeting. The report stated that if all parties agreed a return to work could be attempted in a clerical role and I may be able to build up to between 12 and 15 hours per week. If this was not an option then retiral on ill health should be considered and that my own medical advisors may not agree.

 

A job was offered however it was never really a viable option. I suffer from severe fatigue and bone pain. Sometimes I have a good day but more often that not I can do a little at home then need to rest. It would also cut my salary from £40k per annum to £8k and effect my final salary pension.

 

I refused the job as apart from the fact I don't believe I'm fit to do it, I have never done any clerical work and financially I couldn't afford to do it. On this basis I was informed on 24/10 I had been granted partial ill health retirement backdated to 28/8.

 

I then received a letter on 26/10 stating that as the ill health retirement had been granted my termination date would also be 28/8 and I was due holiday pay which would be paid on the next pay date.

 

I was then told, when I queried no notice pay, that as I had applied to the scheme for ill Heath retirement I was effectively handing in my notice. It has upset me more so because my career was ended in a six line letter.

 

I have had conflicting advice and hope that someone can clarify this for me. As I said if I'm not entitled to it then that's fine but it's only my employer who is telling me this.

 

Sorry this is so long but trying to give you all the relevant information. Thank you

Edited by honeybee13
Formatting.
Link to post
Share on other sites

what I am confused by

- I have only worked with schemes where you are TOLD you are being retired - it seems unusual to have to apply, you are either fit or not. Did you actually have to fill in a form or something?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter saying that he was sorry I didn't feel I could take up the clerical position and would I write and confirm I wished to be considered for ill health retirement under the rules of the scheme.

 

I wrote stating why I did not believe I was fit to work at all and disputing their interpretation of the OH report. I also had no choice but to confirm that I wished to be considered for ill health retirement as proposed by the OH report.

 

I then received a letter saying that the trustees would consider this at the next meeting on 22/10. I did feel at the time that I was being put in the position that they would say I had forfeited my right to notice, however when I mentioned this to my rep he said that they couldn't do that.

 

He has since backed down from that position and is now on holiday. I just feel a bit isolated now. Also at no time have they sought a report from my GP or Consultant they obviously prefer to misinterpret the OH report.

Edited by honeybee13
Spacing.
Link to post
Share on other sites

When I challenged the report they basically ignored me. I have decided not to pursue this as I don't feel I can put myself through any more. It's been a difficult year with this and other things that I would rather not go into. I'm only looking for some advice re the notice pay. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only my opinion but I would say, that they are right in that you had asked for ill health retirement.

 

I know you don't have the energy to pursue this but I would ask for the details of the pension scheme.

 

You could contact the pension dept and ask them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks that's all I needed to know. I know I was conned into making the request but was being told that they couldn't do that. I just needed another opinion. If I had been firing on all cylinders this wouldn't have happened but I guess I would still be working in that case lol. I can let it go now and move on I'm just sad it has ended this way. Thanks again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just pause and offer some sympathy?

 

I've been through a number of IHR procedures, some with employees I was very fond of, and knew that at their best, they were exceptional employees. Illness sucks.

 

I am not sure you are quite accepting that you are ill yet, and the impact of it. You don't want to be retied but are too weak to argue this case, and can't do more than a few hours a week without being exhausted.

 

Can you ask your doctor to refer you for some counselling to help you adapt? For my condition there are specialist nurses to cope with some of the mental health issues arising and with physical adjustments needed.

 

This seems like it would be more helpful than anything else.

 

Back to your question - was something in the form saying your notice was handed in immediately etc etc - ask for a copy of what you signed.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for that. It wasn't a form. I had to respond to his letter which was worded " can you please confirm that you wish to be considered for ill health retirement under the terms of the scheme" in my reply I said I did wish to be considered as recommended in the OH report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case, you need a copy of the terms of the scheme - is it a pension scheme? Talking to the trustees may be helpful. There may be a contact number on the scheme booklet?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...