Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA standing and sitting


suziebear67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3834 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi had ESA tribunal on friday the panel consisted of a lady laywer and a male doctor.

 

When discussing the standing and sitting the lady said I couldnt recieve any points in standing/sitting section if I can sit for an hour although I cant stand for half an hour, but the wording on the descriptors says none of the above apply to score zero.

 

Cannot, for the majority of the time, remain at a work station, either: (i) standing unassisted by another person (even if free to move around) or; (ii) sitting (even in an adjustable chair); or

(iii) a combination of (i) and (ii), for more than 30 minutes, before needing to move away in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion. 9 points.

 

(d) None of the above apply. 0 points

 

Also I claimed JSA in DEC/JAN then claimed ESA from FEB onwards all contribution based can I now claim JSA again when my appeal fails which is what I expect to happen.

 

Thanks in advance for any replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When you went for your ESA Medical you would have been watched closely by the close circuit cameras, they'll be taking on board the length of time you've stay seated, if you got up and walked about and how long you've done that too and also during the medical they would have looked closely how you've sat on the chair whether you were holding the armrests or on your sides for support, if you've just sat without holding or put your hands both sides for support they would have taken notes of it. ATOS watch closely all the times what people do from when you arrive at your medical until you leave, also about doors if you've managed to push the heavy doors to get into the medical room it's there for a purpose especially when people say they cannot lift a carton of milk, please not that I am saying you've told them about can't lift carton milk just giving tips to everyone what happen when you enter an ATOS Medical centre.

 

 

 

 

 

Hi had ESA tribunal on friday the panel consisted of a lady laywer and a male doctor.

 

When discussing the standing and sitting the lady said I couldnt recieve any points in standing/sitting section if I can sit for an hour although I cant stand for half an hour, but the wording on the descriptors says none of the above apply to score zero.

 

Cannot, for the majority of the time, remain at a work station, either: (i) standing unassisted by another person (even if free to move around) or; (ii) sitting (even in an adjustable chair); or

(iii) a combination of (i) and (ii), for more than 30 minutes, before needing to move away in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion. 9 points.

 

(d) None of the above apply. 0 points

 

Also I claimed JSA in DEC/JAN then claimed ESA from FEB onwards all contribution based can I now claim JSA again when my appeal fails which is what I expect to happen.

 

Thanks in advance for any replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can claim JSA, yes. Or, if more than six months have passed since the DWP made the decision to deny you ESA, you can make a new ESA claim.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Suziebear67 I think I have but I thought I let people be aware of how ATOS Centres operate by watching closely of what people do when they arrive at the centres.

 

Hi I have no problems with sitting for an hour but cannot stand for very long think you have misunderstood what I was asking
Link to post
Share on other sites

:suziebear67:

 

The March 11 descriptors for sitting and standing (not applicable to a February 13 claim) were open to different interpretations cos of ambiguous wording. Come 24 September 12, a test case went through an upper tribunal hearing to clarify the issue; whether the test is of ability to remain at a workstation by either sitting, or standing, or a combination of both. The outcome was that, in accordance with Government declared policy intent, the test is of ability to remain at a workstation for 30/60 minutes by sitting, standing, or a combination of both. Even with modern sit/stand desks, I've yet to work out how much work can be done by someone doing a fair imitation of a yo-yo. :???:

 

http://www.osscsc.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=3561

 

Consequently, the wording for the sitting and standing descriptors was amended from January 13, without any concessions for waiting at a bus stop or having to stand on a train.

 

:sorry:, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks all for your replies so am I looking at the old descriptors then or they could do with changing the wording.

 

The medical and refusal for benefit was 25th april 13.

The appeal was 25th October 13.

 

Cant see many employers wanting yoyos to work for them, have applied for 4 jobs whilst on ESA that I was more than qualified for the first 3 I was told there were other people more qualified than myself (was told this after had filled in the reasonable adjustment section) the 4th job had no problems with me not being able to stand long, great I thought, but after I had been working 4 hours they said they needed someone who could stand as well as sit.

 

Really i should have been the ideal candidate for the work group -short term sick- retraining and help finding job- back to join the workforce.

 

ps starryeyes that link describes my situation exactly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:suziebear67:

 

Government's already changed the descriptors (from January 13) in the wake of that upper tribunal decision. According to the letter of the law, the judge's comments about your ability to remain at a workstation were correct, cos first tier tribunals have to follow the interpretations of previous upper tier tribunals.

 

For comparative purposes;

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/228/made

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/3096/made

(amendment of Schedule 2)

 

From what you've written, I'm guessing something's happened to significantly impair your ability to stand and mobilise. Despite Government rhetoric, for most claimants, there's little if any retraining or support. Should you decide to claim jobseekers, ask to see a disability employment adviser. You may be able to negotiate reduced conditionality for a claimant commitment/jobseekers agreement.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :panda:

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you went for your ESA Medical you would have been watched closely by the close circuit cameras

 

Have you any actual evidence at all this happens ?

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard they watch you from when you get out the car (or however you get there) and come into the building.

 

The Tribunal judges also used to do this at our local hearing venue - they had windows looking out to the front of the building, and caught out quite a few people who came rushing into the building, and then once in front of the judge would be hobbling about and making 'groaning' noises.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have and found out the reception write notes and pass it on to the doctors that would give you the medical before you go in the medical room that's why there are always waiting time!

 

 

Have you any actual evidence at all this happens ?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly the cameras are not there for no reasons, also they watch for your facial expressions when they talk to you to seed if you smile or you smile at other people in the waiting room!

 

 

I've heard they watch you from when you get out the car (or however you get there) and come into the building.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have and found out the reception write notes and pass it on to the doctors that would give you the medical before you go in the medical room that's why there are always waiting time!

 

Perhaps they doing this then to catch people out who are playing the system !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:People Watching:

 

Did I mention that one of our local (purpose built) Tatos centres has one way glass in the wall between the office and the waiting area?

 

Or that a pinocchio working in another local office explained a time discrepancy on an IB85 with 'I had to wait for the security video'.

 

None of which should concern a genuine claimant, except for perhaps making them feel a little uncomfortable at being watched. Allegations of cameras in bathrooms and assessment rooms? I've no idea.

 

Most Tatos assessment rooms are fitted with panic buttons.

 

Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty typical that they put in 'security cameras' for their benefit, but no recording equipment in the interview room for the claimant's benefit

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi margaret thx for your comments I had very bad break and dislocation in my ankle in 93 which took around 3 years to get to near normal, fast forward to 2012 constant pain cramps and stiffness so feb 2013 had plate removed now struggling to walk and stand. I shall ask for the disability advisor and see what they can do for me hopefully, I can find some thing paid or unpaid soon.

 

So due to all you people putting in fake claims i now have to suffer, anyone bothered about the dwp watching them must have lied about their illness or disability, as far as im concerned they can come spend day with me anytime. Its about time the benefit awarded was relevant to the amount paid into the system why should i recieve the same amount of JSA as someone who has never worked at all.

 

Rant over.

 

This is the view from all bears in the house

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi margaret thx for your comments I had very bad break and dislocation in my ankle in 93 which took around 3 years to get to near normal, fast forward to 2012 constant pain cramps and stiffness so feb 2013 had plate removed now struggling to walk and stand. I shall ask for the disability advisor and see what they can do for me hopefully, I can find some thing paid or unpaid soon.

 

So due to all you people putting in fake claims i now have to suffer, anyone bothered about the dwp watching them must have lied about their illness or disability, as far as im concerned they can come spend day with me anytime. Its about time the benefit awarded was relevant to the amount paid into the system why should i recieve the same amount of JSA as someone who has never worked at all.

 

Rant over.

 

This is the view from all bears in the house

 

What if the person has never been able to work due to (genuine) chronic illness or disability?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if the person has never been able to work due to (genuine) chronic illness or disability?

 

Remember: the only genuine claim is my claim. The rest of you are fraudsters cheating the system.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember: the only genuine claim is my claim. The rest of you are fraudsters cheating the system.

 

Very true, I forgot that, I'll go turn myself in straight away, I don't know what I was thinking.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

There used to be a two tier system for payments of benefits but it was overtuned by a Labour government for being unfair on people who had never worked and were not likely to work - so of course it was hijacked from the beginning!

 

I have days when I can't stretch my right arm out, or walk without considerable pain down my right side, and am on a waiting list for a CT guided root nerve block, but will that make a difference to the assessment people - I don't know. I have filled in the form and sent it back and am awaiting the result.

 

I seriously would like to get hold of some of the people they use for these Atos assessments and find out exactly what 'professional' qualifications they really do have. I have a 'professional' qualification as a medical secretary so would I be deemed 'qualified enough' to become an Atos assessor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There used to be a two tier system for payments of benefits but it was overtuned by a Labour government for being unfair on people who had never worked and were not likely to work - so of course it was hijacked from the beginning!

 

I have days when I can't stretch my right arm out, or walk without considerable pain down my right side, and am on a waiting list for a CT guided root nerve block, but will that make a difference to the assessment people - I don't know. I have filled in the form and sent it back and am awaiting the result.

 

I seriously would like to get hold of some of the people they use for these Atos assessments and find out exactly what 'professional' qualifications they really do have. I have a 'professional' qualification as a medical secretary so would I be deemed 'qualified enough' to become an Atos assessor?

 

No you would probably do too good a job! Also you would understand the medical terminology, unlike ATOS who have not got past the "Peter as a poorly finger and it hurts" stage in their development.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi margaret thx for your comments I had very bad break and dislocation in my ankle in 93 which took around 3 years to get to near normal, fast forward to 2012 constant pain cramps and stiffness so feb 2013 had plate removed now struggling to walk and stand. I shall ask for the disability advisor and see what they can do for me hopefully, I can find some thing paid or unpaid soon.

 

So due to all you people putting in fake claims i now have to suffer, anyone bothered about the dwp watching them must have lied about their illness or disability, as far as im concerned they can come spend day with me anytime. Its about time the benefit awarded was relevant to the amount paid into the system why should i recieve the same amount of JSA as someone who has never worked at all.

 

Rant over.

 

This is the view from all bears in the house

 

Some of us have good reasons to have never worked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:suziebear67:

 

Guess you needed some points for standing to reach the 15 point threshold for an award of benefit. As already stated you'll be able to claim jobseekers. Or if you can't cope with jobseekers, and your doctor's prepared to continue writing Med 3 (unfit) notes, have another turn on the misery-go-round.

 

The 'fairness' of benefits is an extremely complex political issue but as a very general rule people who've paid in to the system tend to have higher incomes than claimants who've never worked. Which is a bit hard (and harsher following recent reforms) on young people who're disabled from birth. Lots of opinions, but no easy answers.

 

Good luck with whatever you decide, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...