Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice desperately needed!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, First time poster on here - i would really appreciate your advice on a nightmare situation

 

Long story short

- I went out with a girl for over 14 years with the intention that we would both get married together.

During our time at uni we pooled our money to pay for stuff.

 

 

In reality, i ended up paying for absolutely everything including holidays away, car repairs, meals, you name it.

 

 

In order to pay our uni fees we both took out a loan from the bank

- and she transferred a lump sum to my account so that I could pay two years fees.

 

 

Initially the transfer was suggested as a loan but this was never formalised and, after we left uni,

we decided that there was no point me paying her back the money as our finances were intermingled

(although we had separate accounts) and that I had given her far more than she had given me.

In other words, the money was a gift.

 

More years went by and nothing further was said.

 

 

Unfortunately our relationship then fell apart in 2012.

I was taken aback by my (ex) partner's request to have that original loan paid back to her since we were no longer going to be together.

 

 

As this "loan" had been converted to a gift you can understand that I was taken aback by this request

and argued for quite some time that this was completely unreasonable. But, truth be known, i felt guilty about the relationship ending

after so long and my ex wanted to save up to move away from her family who were ruining her life

 

 

i agreed to pay back the money as a matter of goodwill and completely under my terms when I was financially able to afford it.

 

I was lucky enough to start a new relationship with a new girl and things progressed so well that i ended up getting engaged to my new partner this year.

The day AFTER we had told our mutual friends about the engagement, my ex (who had by now worked out the issues with her family)

got in touch and enquired by email about the repayment.

 

 

I replied that I hadn't forgotten about her plight and that i couldn't afford to repay her at the moment,

having just gotten engaged and moving into a new house,

but that I could start repaying her with a monthly standing order starting from January 2014.

 

She emailed me back saying that this wasn't good enough and that she had recalculated a new amount that I should be paying with interest

starting from the day we had broken up and a monthly payment schedule that i frankly couldn't afford.

 

 

I wrote back an email pointing out in polite language that I did not accept that I owed her any money

and that I had agreed to make her a payment out of my goodwill in order to help her escape her family circumstances

and that we had never had a loan agreement or a repayment plan or that any interest was to be charged as the money was a gift.

 

This morning I received a letter from her solicitor representing a formal demand for payment stating that they had seen our email exchange

in which i "readily acknowledged the loan"

and had made apologies for not making the payments back and that they had advised her that I could be pursued through the courts for the missing amount.

 

I was invited to provide a written response within 21 days after which the new, recalculated amount with interest payments,

would be withdrawn and I would be taken to court for a CCJ.

 

I feel quite saddened that things have come to this and I am now in a situation where i need to find some good legal advice to examine my options.

 

The transfer into my account was in 2003 and this email correspondence occurred this Summer, 2013.

 

 

I guess my main questions would be:

 

1. How do I go about finding good legal advice?

2. What do I need to gather to fight this? and what sort of chance do I have?

3. Having received this letter from the solicitors unexpectedly I haven't got any leave booked from work over the next few weeks and will have to access services that are mainly available at the weekend if i'm to make the deadline - which resources should I be utilising?

 

I'm in a state of worry as I have an upcoming wedding to pay for and it would obviously ruin my plans with my new partner.

 

Really really appreciate any advice you can give me - many thanks in advance.

Edited by Andyorch
Paragraphs added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ThePrufeshanul and welcome to CAG

 

I have added paragraphs to your post....... I will redirect your thread were it would be better placed in the General Debt Issues forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..statute barred.

 

more than 6yrs since the money was transferred

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I got my solicitor to write a letter pointing out the debt was statute barred.

 

Got one back saying that the law has recently changed due to a case that went to the House of Lords (Rashid Vs Bradford and Bingley).

 

 

Here, the defendant had the statue bar overturned by the act of acknowledging the debt.

 

 

(theres a brief summary on the jcp solicitors page "admission enough to confirm debt"

 

As this will probably have a major bearing on a lot of the people using this forum I wondered if anyone had any ideas about the best step forward>?

Edited by ThePrufeshanul
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing new... we always ask if you have acknowledged/made payment within 5/6 years...that is the basis of Statute Barred defence.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

NOTHING can UNBAR a debt

 

 

not even a JUDGE.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys - much appreciated.

 

I am going to instruct the solicitor to write back reiterating that the debt is statute barred and that I regard the matter as closed with further communication being regarded as an act of harassment.

 

Please note though - the case that I mentioned above is really important reading for anyone on this forum - can't post links but there is a good summary written by Tim Akkouh and Emily Gillett in the Solicitors Journal.

 

In this case, the company pursued an individual who argued his debt was statue barred - a decsion that was unanimously held up by the Court of Appeal - and which was overturned and unbarred by the House of Lords. At the very least it's important to know that any negotiations / acknowledgements entered into before court action should contain the phrase "without prejudice" to aid the chances of it being inadmissable in a subsequent action.

 

Thanks again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys - much appreciated.

 

At the very least it's important to know that any negotiations / acknowledgements entered into before court action should contain the phrase "without prejudice" to aid the chances of it being inadmissable in a subsequent action.

Thanks again for your help.

 

 

This is why our letters contain the phrase: "No debt is acknowledged to you or any company you claim to represent", and have done for a long time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further couple of questions if anyone is able to help:

 

 

1. Does an email count as a written acknowledgement with a (digital) signature if you put your name at the end?

 

 

2. We never had a joint account however we made occasional transfers of cash between our accounts

after the alleged loan was given

- for example, whilst we were in a relationship, one of us might have paid for dinner

and the other person would transfer their half of the money to cover it at a later date.

 

 

Would the person making the claim have to prove that this transfer was specifically being made towards the alleged debt

and therefore count as an acknowledgement?

 

 

Or would ANY transfer between accounts be presumed to be for payment of the alleged debt?

 

 

3. What is a reasonable amount of time to give the other party to respond before I can say i am regarding the matter as closed

and unwilling to enter into any further correspondence?

 

 

thanks again - really appreciate it.

Edited by ThePrufeshanul
Link to post
Share on other sites

specific payments.

I wouldn't worry too much

I don't think this will go anywhere

 

 

its just a bit of willy waving to see if you'll fall for it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Just an update - thanks for all the advice, following the posting of my last etter I didn't hear anything further. Looks as though it was indeed "willy waving"!

 

 

This is good news :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...