Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Zero Hour Contracts and Holiday Pay - ** RESOLVED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks I could do with some stone clad advice. I am currently a care worker on a zero hour contract. My average weekly wage is around £415 (taken over 12 weeks). I have just received 5 days holiday equivalent to £350. My feeling is that this is wrong and I should have a weeks wage for claiming 5 days holiday pay. It is only a small firm and the company accountant takes our our average wage for the week and divides by 7 to get a daily rate and then pays this accordingly to how many days you are claiming for.

 

My annual wage is usually around £21500 so as a guide 12.07% is £2595 holiday pay I should expect over the course of the year for 28 days. This works out at a daily rate of £92.68 for every day claimed. If this figure were to be obtained via a 12 week period it would work out the same.

 

At the rate they are paying me I will end up with £1960 over the course of the year. Please help as I maintain I am being underpaid but the accountant insists he is correct. Who is correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a zero hours contract the holiday should be aggregated at 12.07% of every hour's pay earned - that isn't legislation, just the easiest way to work it, so that every employee has a running 'bank' of hours available to book as holiday.Nevertheless - if a 12 week reference period is used, then you should get an entitlement based on that, however there are a couple of complications to that. Your 12 week reference period - how many hours a week have you worked on average for your £415? Does this include hours worked above 'Full Time' hours? The employer may be calculating your holiday based on 'Full Time' entitlement - if you work above what is considered full time, then those hours may not be used to calculate your entitlement.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar problem last year and the advice I was given was that you are entitled to 12.07% of your earnings for the last 12 weeks in which you were paid wages. These do not have to be consecutive weeks, just weeks in which you actually earned anything. I was paid holiday on this basis by a very large company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for both your replies. To earn my £415 a week my wages are a mix of hourly paid work and paid sleep shifts where we are paid to sleep at a service users house. As a rule of thumb I have been doing approximately 55 hours and 2 sleeps a week.

 

The accountant is taking our last 13 weeks wages and dividing by 91 (the amount of days during period to get a daily rate and paying to how much we want. i.e. I had a week off and was asked if I how many days holiday pay I wanted. So if I wanted 7 days holiday pay I will have received £415. I still mantain it is wrong and want to prove it before going in guns blazing.

 

There are no 'full time hours' by entitlement so I can discount this as a method used. Our holiday pay is directly related to how much we earn. I presume Sidewinder you mean that as full time staff they can assume we work 40 hours a week so we will earn that as holiday pay?

 

A few months ago they put a vote to all staff to see if we wanted holiday pay as we earnt our normal. i.e. I earn £415 a week so my pay for that week will have been 415 + 12.07% = 465.09 and we would have been responsible for putting our own holiday pay aside. Nearly all staff voted against this but I can only assume therefore they waanted to work off the 12.07% rule.

 

So off the back of that info am I any closer to an answer? Thanks again for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you need to get something in writing. Try asking the employer for a copy of your contract regarding holiday and their definition of holiday entitlement. The law is clear in that a week's pay should be your wages averaged over 12 weeks (where wages are irregular) and I cannot see how their calculations stack up (unless they are using the 28 day 'cap' on statutory holiday in some way that I cannot get my head around).

 

Trying to get staff to accept a 12.07% premium and do away with holiday constitutes rolled up holiday pay, which has been deemed unlawful - good job that didn't go through!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are entitled to 5.6 weeks holiday pay.

 

If your "week" is 7 days and you therefore get 39.2 days allowance (instead of the 28 a 5 day week holiday person gets) the accountant is correct.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wobbly in this case we need to know how many days leave the person gets. Different calculations for wtd etc.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is to be an investigation into these "zero" hour contracts.

 

 

Stuart Roden, South West organiser for Unison union, said: "Zero hours are effectively slave labour and the worst kind of exploitation for those forced into this kind of employment as they, demand staff to be totally subservient and to be available 24-7 but without any guarantee of income.

 

"It means that employees cannot obtain normal credit arrangements or mortgages and property rental become problematic as they have no proof of regular income.

 

 

Read more: http://www.thisiscornwall.co.uk/1-700-council-workers-zero-hours-contracts/story-19832156-detail/story.html#ixzz2gCRZv8an

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a zero hours contract the holiday should be aggregated at 12.07% of every hour's pay earned -

 

I am not sure this applies to zero hour contracts. I've seen threads in other forums where workers on ZHC were paid peanuts or no holiday pay at all. I would like to see a link to a resource to be 100% sure.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again thanks all for your input. Emmzzi in response to how many holiday days we receive. We get the standard 28 days holiday entitlement if holiday pay was paid in accordance to how you have said I would have no argument unfortunately we get no more entitlement to holiday days which as I understand they are entitled to do whether you work more than 5,6 or 7 days a week. Just would like people to know I am in discussions with my director about this and she is sympathetic to what I am saying but ultimately she has to listen to what the accountant is telling her. I am still 95% certain that the accountant is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

National Minimum Wage and Paid Holiday apply to all workers' contracts - even zero hours ones.

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=4468

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/7/o/Holidays-and-holiday-pay.pdf

The second link has no mention of zero hour contract. The first one only vaguely mentions holiday pay but doesn't quantify it in any way. It is widely recognised that employers exploit zero-hours contracts to dodge holiday and sick pay.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Employers might exploit the ignorance of their workers (or in many cases may be ignorant themselves), but the fact remains that it is unlawful to not give paid holiday. The mutuality of obligation or otherwise is usually not sufficient to change that.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

san_d, the legal basis for this is the Working Time Regulations: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1833/contents/made. The right to paid annual leave is at Regulation 13. The WTD sets out how this should be calculated in great detail where an employee does not have regular working hours. The exceptions are set out in Part III and zero-hour contracts are not one of them. Similarly zero-hour workers are still entitled to statutory sick pay.

 

My understanding is that most zero-hour employers provide a top-up to the hourly rate to deal with the right to paid annual leave. No doubt there are employers who break the law but I would think that most large employers are basically compliant.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From GOV website

Rolled-up holiday pay

 

Holiday pay should be paid for the time when annual leave is taken. An employer cannot include an amount for holiday pay in the hourly rate (known as ‘rolled-up holiday pay’). If a current contract still includes rolled-up pay, it needs to be re-negotiated.

Living in the wild windy west of Ireland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steampowered,rolled up holiday pay is not allowed!

 

It is (sort of), but the contract needs to be VERY specific and the payslip equally detailed to clearly specify which proportion of the rate of pay is apportioned to the holiday aspect. The holiday pay portion of the pay must also be clearly in addition to the standard rate of pay and should not be used to reduce it.

 

In general terms rolled up holiday pay is technically unlawful, however where a contract is clear and specific, and the worker can be under no illusion that an additional rate of pay is made to account for holiday - at the correct percentage equating to the 5.6 weeks entitlement under the WTD - then an employer can still get away with this practice.

 

This is because although a worker may have a technical right to claim that the employer has failed to pay holiday pay in accordance with the WTD, an ET can only award an amount equivalent to the holiday pay due - so if the employer can demonstrate clear evidence that the correct amount of holiday pay has been paid to the worker, even though it is 'rolled up' then it is a technical breach only, and no additional award can be made.

 

Definitely not good practice, strictly speaking unlawful, but it can still be used providing it is done carefully and with the employee's understanding and agreement. Case law continues to throw up as many contradictions as it does points which clarify the issue!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks to all involved, it would seem according to the case referred to in mariefab's post that this is what is happening to me. I have the contract regarding holiday pay and is as follows

 

Holiday Entitlement

During the holiday year 1st January 2010 and beyond, paid leave equivalent to 5.6 working weeks ( working days) during the complete year

 

You will accrue your holidays concurrently during the year and your entitlement for part years of service will be calculated as 1/12th of the annual entitlement for each completed month of service during the current holiday year.

 

Holiday Pay

If you do not work a basic week of fixed or regular hours and/or days of work, calculation of a 'week's holiday pay' will be based on an average of your earnings during the twelve weeks actually worked in the period immediately leading up to the commencement date of your holiday.

 

I have also spoken to my director again today regarding this and she is urging me to sit down with the accountant as she says he is adamant he is correct. She explained to me that he is putting aside 12.07% in a pot and using that in accordance to pay us. We can be paid non accrued holiday pay if it is likely we are to earn enough to cover it.

 

On the basis of that my original statement surely still stands as I will have "built a pot" of approximately £2500 by the end of the financial year but have been paid approximately just under £2000.

 

Can I use anything concrete with the accountant other than the case highlighted above. Also if the accountant refuses to budge what are my options then? Thanks for all help it has been invaluable.

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we use annual wage of £21500 my calculation is as follows:

weekly rate = 21500 / 52 = £413.46

holiday pay entitlement = 413.46 * 5.6 = £2315.38

 

This seems to be what is specified in your contract which is consistent with the Working Time Regulations. Regardless of the legal problems with rolled-up holiday pay this does not seem to be what is in your contract.

 

Perhaps the 12.07% thing is an internal company arrangement for managing cash flow rather than something you are contractually entitled to?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can use your contract clause titled 'Holiday Pay'.

Any accountant should know how to calculate an average, it's junior school maths.

In case he doesn't; explain that all he needs to do is add together the last 12 weeks wages then divide that total by 12.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...