Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Tagging @stu007 who's great with this. For now, scan, redact and upload anything you think will be useful    
    • That's fine.  The important thing is to show Kev you're trouble and so best to drop you like a hot potato. Invest in a 2nd class stamp tomorrow - all Kev is worth - and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Do not under any circumstances plead guilty until we know what we are dealing with. It's a sure way to 9 points. The tried and tested way to handle this is to plead not guilty to both charges and offer to plead guilty to speeding provided the "Fail to give information" charge is dropped. But I am concerned about this "ticket refused" sticker. I've never heard of this before. A "ticket" is not a term used in connection with speeding offences. There seems a distinct possibility that your response was received by the police but one thing worries me: I've never heard of a sticker being placed on a response and it being returned "Return to Sender". t's just not what ticket offices do. If you could post a picture of this document and the sticker it might help.  If you can show the response was received you may have a defence to the "Fail to Provide" charge (provided you completed your response properly). If the police are saying you did not respond they cannot succeed with a speeding charge (as they have no evidence you were driving). But if you did not respond, who put the sticker on the document and sent it back yo you?
    • lolerz, many thanks for your reply and correcting my big mistake, oh dear start again. They sent the section 48 along with the Form NO 6A, it was sitting on top of the paperwork, sorry about that. SO they have sent me a Form No 6A and i have received the court paperwork with the claim form and defence paperwork.    
    • Hamster Bedding. Ignore.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice required: on a DMP with Payplan but thinking of making settlement offers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3491 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If the debts were prior to April 2007 then no agreement or a bad one would render them unenforceable.

 

I suppose it depends on how much you are paying and if you can afford it

 

Personally I would write to each one and say that as they are now in default of your lawful CCA request you will be stopping payment until they can comply with a correctly executed agreement and the other documents that are required.

If you can afford it put the money to one side to try and build up a war chest then if they come back in 3 or 6 months with the correct paperwork you can either make up the back payments or possibly have enough money to make lower full and finals

 

Make sure you start your letter with " I do not acknowledge and debt to you or anyone you represent"

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the history of these debts what amounts are owing and have any been passed to DCAs for collection (other than BOS who are in house "pretend" debt collectors)?

 

 

Have you done a recent credit file check?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not have the required documents within the time specified the you must stop paying, if they then find your agreements then you can start to talk about how to pay, this is not right they expect you to pay, when it is clearly at present unenforceable, why pay them when they may not even have the right to collect?

 

 

As dx100uk says no cca no pay

 

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absence of the CCA does not affect the underlying liability to pay the debt, it remains payable and can be reported to CRAs.

 

 

The creditor/DCA may produce a reconstituted agreement to satisfy a sect. 77/78 request.

 

 

The debt may or may not be enforceable in court if a recon is supplied a judge would decide on the balance of probabilities.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absence of the CCA does not affect the underlying liability to pay the debt, it remains payable and can be reported to CRAs.

 

 

The creditor/DCA may produce a reconstituted agreement to satisfy a sect. 77/78 request.

 

 

The debt may or may not be enforceable in court if a recon is supplied a judge would decide on the balance of probabilities.

 

Even a UE debt that is irredeemably UE or statute barred still exists under English and Welsh law. As you are in a DMP then I would imagine all the debts have been defaulted anyway.

 

Yes we know that a recon can satisfy a S77/78 request but it is after all only an information request. Usually for a pre 2007 agreement the lack of a signed agreement does mean they can not enforce. The recent case where that was not so was down to a thoroughly unreliable witness. (Who sits in a hearing when your wife testifies and then says they weren't listening?) Arrow global v Frost Bristol County court

 

 

The above reasons are why I suggested if possible saving the money you were paying so that if they come back with anything concrete you can either catch up payments if needed or maybe make reduced full and finals

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

as your CCA replies appear

 

start a new thread for each one in the named bank forum off the main forum tab.

 

who is your DMP with

 

how LONG have you been in it?

 

all three of those DCA are WELL KNOWN for cash cowing people.

 

pers i'd be stopping payment to them ALL bar p'haps RBS

 

and stopping the DMP totally.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged

 

I see you've already been given much of the repeated advise already

 

please keep to ONE THREAD

 

till you start getting the CCA returns.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi there,

 

Firstly, the advice on this site has been fantastic, and saved me a lot of time and money so far!

 

Currently, I'm with PAYPLAN DMP since forever.

. 10 years plus Come January

 

 

I'll come into a little bit of capital which I would like to use as ammunition for full and final with some of my creditors.

I figure this is a 'fast track' way to reduce debt (but only if one has the funds, right?)

 

I've done this before, way back, with a company that offered me 60% reduction. Equidebt.

Regrettably back then I didn't know about CCA requests.

So that was wiped out albeit after paying 40%.

 

I still have a list of creditors, being drip fed on my DMP.

Cleared a couple away with successful CCA reqs thanks to this website.

The creditors admitted they had nothing and offered a clean slate.

A bigger debt of mine, with RBoS, sent me the original CCA so fair do's!

 

I'm living abroad in Asia,

but manage to keep in track only just,

give or take a few weeks delay in the post.

Unfortunately I've missed my monthly payments the last 3 months,

but like I said I've got capital coming in this jan.

 

So would the best approach here be to start with f&f's?

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you've sent a CCA request to everone

 

 

and you've done all the reclaiming of PPI etc you can?

 

 

please list your debts

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged on the same subject yet again.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Apologies, I posted a new thread but then it appears on the back of my old ones!

 

Current creditors are:

HSBC (overdraft)

Lloydstsb (overdraft)

Lloydstsb (credit card)

Barclays Bank (credit card)

RBoS (credit card)

Student Loans

 

I've not CCA'd these as I read somewhere there is no point with banks n credit cards?

No PPI that I'm aware of. Would there be PPI on OD's ?

All debts are now in hundreds not thousands, except good old Student Loans from 90's, and BoS.

So far I've paid 21k on my DMP over the years.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the od's you cant CCa

the rest you can.

 

 

might be worth a try

 

 

even if with the oc's still.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

for £1 its worth a punt.

 

 

cant be too much left on these?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...