Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Banks have different limits above which they require Probate. So it may be Probate is not needed, although as he died with no Will that could complicate things. Is all the £28k with Virgin Money? Your wife should contact all banks who hold his money with the death certificate and ask them what they need to release the funds to her. Most banks have a central "bereavement department". Check their websites. Use that department rather than general call centre or bank branch if they have one. Nearly every bank website has a section on "what to do when a customer dies" so have a search for that. Your wife may also have to provide evidence that she is his daughter. When his wife died it sounds like they had a joint bank account so that's why her money just went across to him. But as it isn't a joint account now transfer to your wife won't be quite that simple.  
    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help gross misconduct accidental theft:(


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3902 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hes tried just explaining last week before he got suspension letter so was pretyped before speaking to him.

 

hes been reading acas.

 

it seems the chat was week just him and his line manager/area manager was part of formal investigation and wlll be used next week.

 

But he had no witness and no one took notes is this bad procedure?

 

It wasent until he answered the questions that he realised he was being formally investigated.

 

hes was so upset last week he dident want to talk about it.

 

now im asking him what was said by whom and in what order.

 

really wish had been documented now.

 

The problem is somone in store one of his employees has abused his discount card without his knowldge.

 

This also classed as gross misconduct.

 

Someone in store also reported him.

 

is this the same person does disgrunted empployee have it in for him?

 

He will mention it but will make him look negligant as he dident realised this had gone on his store under his watch,.

 

theres strict rules on staff discountb which hes been careful to adehere to.

 

hes not being displined for theft.

 

hes being displined for deception!

 

up until last week he was one of best mangers in company his area manaher loved him, regional irector hes turned a problem store around brought down stockloss but he has ipset a few employees whilst doing that as was poor culture on comliance within his store in the past.

He was brought in new fresh face new to company to trouble shoot.

 

its everyone thinking hes atheif the stress relly taken his toll on him and us a family.

hes being paid but if he loses his job means bad times for us as could take him months to get another job at same level espially with dismissed for theft on his records.

 

he dopes not know the manger who doing the hearing ihes off another area and hes worried he will look at col hard facts yes they been taken, not paid for , had 2 chances and hes admitted it and they have evience to coroberarte thats the case.

 

Im guessing the hr manager be there too or another manager as I always done dispiinaries in pairs when I was an employer.

 

hes going to plead his case

 

good history

no record of drime

sorry

accident

procedural errors

tired due to working excessive hours and bt stressed whch he has been,

 

other than that not sure.

 

How has he committed deception? I cant see it myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You seem to be looking for a magic answer.

 

There isn't one. Tell him to go and tell the truth; that's all he can do.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The deception might be that, he could, theoretically, have planned it: destroyed a pair of cheap trews for the purposes of obtaining a new pair. Phenomenally unlikely, perhaps, but the paranoia of senior management is well documented.

 

That''s ALL good mitigation.

 

An investigation is only an investigation; no legal requirement for a 'rep.' and even if accompanied, the compadre has no interventional rights.

 

There will be a manager (and impartiality is a requirement, so it is good it is someone who will look at cold hard facts rather than personalities on the shop-floor), and s/he will be accompanied by HR, generally; your feller needs union rep / knowledgeable companion there two.

 

Has he made a formal allegation about the discount card abuse?

 

APOLOGIES for answering and asking questions at the same time, was working backwards up your post!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what I'm trying to tell you.

 

The discount card is not an issue at the moment, the deception is, I second what Em said.

You seem to be looking for a magic answer.

 

There isn't one. Tell him to go and tell the truth; that's all he can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know he has to go and tel it like it is which he will do.

 

I know theres no magic answer.

 

no hes nor reported staff discount abuse as only discovered it today as cae through with disiplnary letter.

 

Most definatly not planned he was wearing expensive par suit bottoms from m&s

 

he told lady who go trousers just pick cheapest pair half decent ones in my size and i will pay for it later.

 

The manager who intereveiwed him he got on well will.

 

he did adjourn and we guess spoke to the lone hr manger in the company via phone.

 

then gave out disiplinary letter and escorted him away.

 

Hes gutted last week hes still in shock.

 

I just want hi to go there next week prepared but most definatly alone.

 

hes so embaressed by it all.

 

I know the staff isount diffrent issue,

 

but an investigation should be far and accurate and his purchase hisstory is innacuare,

 

also got hoi thinking who has it in for him instore made him feel bit paranoid and alone over simple mistake

 

So when should he bring up staff discount? next week or before so they can investigate further?

 

 

Just feel so powerless an wanted to help in him some way.

.

will have to wait until tuesday and update you guys then.

 

I guess 3things happen.

 

he can return to work.

 

they adjourn pending further investigations

 

or the dismiss him.

 

its the not knowing thats hard.

 

sorry if im confusing or repeating myself.

 

do value any advice on matter and virtual support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd raise the inaccuracies at the investigatory meeting and expect an adjournment for further investigation. While he is is suspended he is getting paid, so that's something.

 

A meeting further away is a bonus as he'll know less people than locally?

 

Just keep telling him you believe in him.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's absolutely FUNDAMENTAL that he exercises his statutory right and goes in accompanied; remember the hearing manager will be accompanied- i.e. have a witness- and so must he, if only so that 'fair play' can be seen to be done.

 

BTW, I was under the impression that the investigatory stage was now over (e.g. post #26) and that this meeting 'up north' was part of the formal disciplinary process?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it is next week is dispilary so no more investigatation.

 

These facts came to light today not at meeting last week where he was too shell shocked to think straight.

 

so should he ring up profit priotection tommorow in advance of hearing?

 

yes hes being paid until next week anyway.

 

he knows i belive him and thik brought us closer together.

 

in past when we both did investigations in other companies we always had notetaker

 

he only thourght baout it toay when rlooking at acas webste.

would joing aunion now be too late, any help or make things owrse.

 

he cant think ayone he wants with him.

 

so next week could be adjourned based on inncaurate purchase hispry and unprofessional banter encloses wth innacurate report?

 

its allengation of deception.

so other than tellin the truth which hes done.

 

how does he disprovve the allengation?

 

does deception have a specfic criteria? does the facts of is case meet that?

As we already think its not theft as intent was not there.

 

disception seems so vaugue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

joining a union now would probably be too late; it's like an insurance policy, you cant buy it after you have been burgled.

 

if he has any friends who are reps anywhere, however, they can go with

 

I would flag the purchase history now, yes

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol emmizzi made me chuckle.

 

just felt banter uprofessional.

 

caravan made me chuckle hubbsy least caravan loving type ever.

 

will get hin to rg profot protection tommorow? or hr? or regional?

 

I knew union couldent go in there but wondered if they could offer advice.

 

i cant think anyone who could go with him. he has few freinds as such within the company.

 

his 1 freind ot been in touch and think hes too worried to phone him.

 

Apologies if sound like complete fruitcake just been very stressful tme.Just as such massive repurcussions for family fnances and his career.

 

just feel very sad its come to this.

 

thanks for all your advice.

 

hoping behind scenes theres not actually employee in store who has it in for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok in this case it be profit protection.

 

should he ask someone sen him handbook?

 

also found this on acas

 

 

 

The purpose of an investigation is to look into potential disciplinary matters to establish the facts of the case.

The employee is not entitled to see copies of all allegations during an investigation. However, where the matter escalates to a disciplinary hearing it is good practice that the employee be given sufficient information about the alleged misconduct or poor performance to enable them to prepare to answer the case and defend themselves at the disciplinary meeting. Employers would therefore usually send copies of any documentary evidence they are relying on (e.g. witness statements, emails, transcripts etc) to the employee at the same time as the letter informing them of the time and date of the hearing.

 

For more information on this subject or to discuss a situation specific to your workplace please contact the Acas Helpline.

 

 

other than the list of purchases hes seen no witness statements.

 

does not know who was questioned.

should he know all this stuff prior the hearing?

 

Is it worth him ring acas helpline?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look.

 

He knows he took the trousers.

 

He knows he forgot to pay.

 

What good is seeing statements going to do?

 

You are just picking over the bones now. Go have more tea!!!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i know :(

 

just feel so worried,

 

havent had tea cant face eating.

 

trying to keep myself distracted and fubd useful stuff that make us both feel bit less glum.

 

im trying to be positve

 

might get early nite as have another5days of worry before hearing.

 

I just wondered by deception maybe something said in statemnets something false or malicious.

 

yes im clutching at straws because i dont wish him to lose his job /career over innocent mistake.

 

aplogies if been annoying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vent all you like, you need a safe ear

 

but try and get some kip, yes

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok its gets more odd.

 

today was disiplinary day.

 

area manager of diffrent region and hr woman taking notes.

 

the supsension and dispiplinary was for deception to take goods.

 

Hubby spoke truth admitted he was sorry there as no deception just huge error of judgemnt.

 

When he said he looked at till to look up price-they said that was breech of policy that he should ahve done it on computer he dident realise that.

 

They adjourned and consulted lawyer and came back with re suspension pending further investigation for breech of company policy.

 

So im thinking they did not feel comfortble dismissing on grouds of theft as intenet not their or deception as not enough eveidence.

 

They dident seem to care about personal banter about boss killing me if dont get work done.

or fact purchase history was innacurate they said its noted but irrelevent.

 

but glad he noted it.

 

It appears profit protection have done an audit on his store since he left and found something else to have him for.

 

He thinks its the fact he checked price of trousers flag programe not someone reported him which suppose is good as he has mostly good working relationship with his store team and had very good working relationship with his boss and company director,

 

They said they write to him and he thinks the new allegation is breech of company policy in relation to stock management now!

 

Bsically in last 2 companies hes worked for they have corrected inevntry in store.

 

so he counts daily to check stock levels are correct as that can delay new stock coming in , affecet availiability and annoy customers who rsereve and collect last item then come in and get annoyed as the 1 item they thourght was in stock and rserved is not. Approx over a year ago he emailed profit protection and asked them to make some stock adjustments and they emailed back said do it in store through the tilll which hes done for past year on regular basis!

 

This is infact breech of policy in company handbook. They not saying hes flasifying stock levels and pocketing stock himself. They saying he breeched company policy in teh way he did it and classing it as stock manipulation which think aslo gross misconduct.

 

I asked if he had email he said was over year ago so deleted.someoe gave innacurate advice which he took.

The emailw as from profit protection who now doinga udit and trying to get hism dismissed over this,

 

I said he needs to get hodl of ahndbook we dont have one at home and hes not allowed in store or to speak to anyone still.His old supervisor did off record rang ask him how he was says staff think someone has died thats why hes off,.

 

He only had 2 weeks training in another store where store manager hatdly spent any time with hier.

 

dont think he had any offfical training documents signed off before he landed in his stotre and was expected hit the ground running.

 

He did sign contract which said he read and undestood terms in compay handbook.

 

He probably did have reasonably good read of some bits of it in reality who rememebsr every detail you look at specific obvious things.

 

Hes vastly mproved stock loss, customer service and avaialibility /standards since hes been there.

 

He was rising star now this.

 

It seems so vindictive now like they have it in for him.

 

Beacuse he started before april 6th he can appeal.

 

should he start a greviance against profit protection for unprofessional insesnitive behaviour, inacurate douments and inaccurate advie on policy?

 

what next steps now?

 

guess we have to wait for letter

 

maybe ring acas again.

 

I did say before he went if they cant prove deception they wont be able to dismiss on other grouds they would have to find another reason. Which they did.

 

Im glad hes not sacked hes still on pay but its the not knowing.

 

lying to family and freinds.

 

dont know how long this goes on?

 

hes very stressed about it all?

 

is it worth him going sick?hes not in the best state im trying be postive.

 

wondering if we need to consult an employment lawyer.,

 

wish we had that flipping email. but cant access in store, he used outlook i think does that get stored on cloud anywhere?

 

if e tell head office then they could arase any evidence there end that email was sent.

 

Hes applied for few other jobs not much out there but hes in the world he wants to leave.

 

but he needs to be sacked to get jsa?

but not sure how that look on cv.

 

so bit stuck really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

area manager of diffrent region and hr woman taking notes. - normal

 

the supsension and dispiplinary was for deception to take goods. - you knew this already

 

Hubby spoke truth admitted he was sorry there as no deception just huge error of judgemnt.

 

When he said he looked at till to look up price-they said that was breech of policy that he should ahve done it on computer he dident realise that.

 

They adjourned and consulted lawyer and came back with re suspension pending further investigation for breech of company policy. - ok. can they show he was trained or should have known about this policy?

So im thinking they did not feel comfortble dismissing on grouds of theft as intenet not their or deception as not enough eveidence. - that's a plus as it gets the GMC out of the way!

They dident seem to care about personal banter about boss killing me if dont get work done. - well I did tell you to not bring it up as it didn't matter

or fact purchase history was innacurate they said its noted but irrelevent. - I'd disagree with that and suggest it needs investigating too

 

but glad he noted it.

 

It appears profit protection have done an audit on his store since he left and found something else to have him for. - have found something else to investigate. you really must stop having him sacked and out the door before investigations are complete.

He thinks its the fact he checked price of trousers flag programe not someone reported him which suppose is good as he has mostly good working relationship with his store team and had very good working relationship with his boss and company director,

 

They said they write to him and he thinks the new allegation is breech of company policy in relation to stock management now!

 

Bsically in last 2 companies hes worked for they have corrected inevntry in store.

 

so he counts daily to check stock levels are correct as that can delay new stock coming in , affecet availiability and annoy customers who rsereve and collect last item then come in and get annoyed as the 1 item they thourght was in stock and rserved is not. Approx over a year ago he emailed profit protection and asked them to make some stock adjustments and they emailed back said do it in store through the tilll which hes done for past year on regular basis! - it is unfortunate he does not have the email. Again what training can they show he had?

This is infact breech of policy in company handbook. They not saying hes flasifying stock levels and pocketing stock himself. - good They saying he breeched company policy in teh way he did it and classing it as stock manipulation which think aslo gross misconduct. - really? what benefit did he get from that personally then? did it make the store look better?

I asked if he had email he said was over year ago so deleted.someoe gave innacurate advice which he took.

The emailw as from profit protection who now doinga udit and trying to get hism dismissed over this,

 

I said he needs to get hodl of ahndbook we dont have one at home and hes not allowed in store or to speak to anyone still.His old supervisor did off record rang ask him how he was says staff think someone has died thats why hes off,. He should write to HR and ask for a copy of the handbook and also for them to confirm when he was issued with a copy

He only had 2 weeks training in another store where store manager hatdly spent any time with hier.

 

dont think he had any offfical training documents signed off before he landed in his stotre and was expected hit the ground running. - helpful to his case

 

He did sign contract which said he read and undestood terms in compay handbook. - um. oops.

 

He probably did have reasonably good read of some bits of it in reality who rememebsr every detail you look at specific obvious things. - not an argument to use at all. "I think everyone reads carelessly" will not help.

Hes vastly mproved stock loss, customer service and avaialibility /standards since hes been there. - good!

 

He was rising star now this.

 

It seems so vindictive now like they have it in for him. - in your head, yes. the reality may be very different. they do need to investugate irregularities and it is not a mark of a vendetta!! Calm down for pete's sake.

Beacuse he started before april 6th he can appeal.

 

should he start a greviance against profit protection for unprofessional insesnitive behaviour, inacurate douments and inaccurate advie on policy? - no, that's going to look very childish. He should maintain a calm professionalism.

what next steps now? - sit tight while they investigate. drink tea.

 

guess we have to wait for letter

 

maybe ring acas again. - I find their advice patchy at best.

 

I did say before he went if they cant prove deception they wont be able to dismiss on other grouds they would have to find another reason. Which they did.

 

Im glad hes not sacked hes still on pay but its the not knowing.

 

lying to family and freinds. - why do you have to lie? Just don't say anything!

 

dont know how long this goes on? - possibly for months

 

hes very stressed about it all?

 

is it worth him going sick?hes not in the best state im trying be postive. - what does he gain by going sick if he is getting paid anyway? nothing. If he is ill he should however see his doctor. But I'd try and keep a clean sick record.

wondering if we need to consult an employment lawyer., - why? they are simply investigating. the lawyer has no info to help at this stage.

wish we had that flipping email. but cant access in store, he used outlook i think does that get stored on cloud anywhere? - ask if he can do an accompanied search of his emails to find the record.

if e tell head office then they could arase any evidence there end that email was sent. - conspiracy theories abound, I see.

Hes applied for few other jobs not much out there but hes in the world he wants to leave.

 

but he needs to be sacked to get jsa?

but not sure how that look on cv.

 

so bit stuck really.

 

My answers underlined. One again you are making a normal investigation into a catastrophe. This won't help anyone.

 

If it were me investigating and he had no financial gain from his actions I'd find out how the breach occurred and retrain, end of. Of course if he starts throwing grievances, sick leave and other paid employment into the mix that'd be different - then I WOULD be looking to replace him for a quiet life!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for advce sorry if seem like paranoid loon.

 

 

Just his disiplinary as 2.5hours long/

 

looks like not enough evidence to prove theft as no intent and they dont feel secure dismissing for deception.

 

We have no written letter for the new suspension should supsenson always be in writing?

 

The manager said it would be in the post.

 

he hinted at they would be going for him under stock manipulation- a act of gross misdconduct leding to dismissial.

 

They had very little eveidence with regards to trousers.

 

just husbands immediate admissioin

 

cctv footage him wearing the trousers.

 

they took witness statemnets but hes not seen ny

 

the list of pucrhases from profit protection -trousers not on it but other radndom expensive purchases hes made are and they dont seem overly worried just said its noted.

 

he now knows he should have checked staff dicount price through computer not till as thats policy-again training need.

 

This new thing they want him for.

 

yes hes admitted it as he did not realise he was dong anything wrong.

 

its abreech of policy in procedures - no grand plan to manipulate stock just him doing what he thourght was part of his job.Its a training need and hes not been officilly trained as nothing signed off.

 

I would of anticipiated suspension letter to say breech of company poliicy not the super inflated allegation of stock manipulation which by its very desription sounds devious, dishonest and premeditated.

 

Easy to say outside looking in.

 

But its been horrible time for all of us.

 

as usual I will try remain postive, kleep busy lkeep his mind of things just seems really crappy we now still in limbo over completlly unrelated thing. I ould understand if profit protection did audit due to bad stock loss and their was breech of policies all over the shop but riht now only hubby whos beingt dragged over the coals.

 

we ancipiate another dispiplinary next week perhaps even further away with another area manager .

 

They have company conferance early next week so wont be after then as have no letter of suspension of letter inviting to disiplinary as has to be 48hours notice.

 

So fact hes signed contract agreeing to every detail in handbook.

But nothad any documented training or been offically siigned off will that cancel out not reading handbook properly?

im not even sure he had his own copy , its not accesible online , theirs copies in stoire.

 

he only had 2 week training period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So that's going to be a swift lesson in reading things properly before you sign, I am afraid.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the OP can you not rehash info and keep stating the same things, the more you say something it doesn;t make any difference and disengages IMHO people from reading.

 

Emmzzi has hit the nail on the head here with the advice and if he did get that email then at the next meeting state he received that and that is why he followed that process. They will be able to retrieve the email no problems

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok feel need to update.

 

hes got handbook and does not mention procedures for adjustig stock or checking up staff discount price.

 

he had letter wed for driday.

ie today

 

hes invited tp meeting of outcome re the flipping trousers.

no new eveidence will be presented

nothing was included in the letter.

So he thourght it would be pretty quick.

 

its was 2.5hour drive.

same area manager as last time and a store manager

 

the letter he got said they still investigating the stock thing separate.

 

last dsiplinary resuspended but pending further investigation, but no investigation was made during this time.

 

hes got there today and been questioned for 2hours again about the trousers

 

all stuff hes gone over in initail investogation and last dsiiplinary.

 

i keep thinking if they had grounds to dsimiss theyw ould have 2 weeks ago saved themselves the wages.

 

nothings changed in last 2weeks

they presented no new eveidence.

we presented no new evidence.

 

husband was unprepared for interrogation today.

 

hes either getting dismissed.

go back-not likly.

maybe cleared on trousers but resuspended for stock thing which we not prepared for as have no detail on ths offence.

 

rang union see if could join over stock not trousers? no as already started investigating stock think.

 

hes been off a month now

he has right of appeal

he keeps checking website see if they advertising his job.they not.

hes meant to be weeks holiday on rota next week.

he has a job interveiw which cheered him up.

 

hes just trying to get enough tie to find something else and leave.

 

as even if he goes back his careers dead over this and he has some reservations over the companies conduct throughout.

 

The email not even bought up today as they just discussing trousers today.

 

hees been investogated for 2 separate things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Husbands just rang.

 

They have dismissed him over the trousers-gross misconduct-deception take company property.

I felt sure if he was going to be dimssed over this would have been 2 weeks ago.

 

feel a bit sick.

 

hes mentioned to them he wil appeal?

 

what now other than sign on.

 

go cab?

get 30mins free with empployement lawyer

ring acas?

 

guess all of the above.

 

how easy, qucik and successful is appeals process?

was no of innacuracies and time delay throughout whole process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...