Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yellow Box Junction PCN - Video proof is here


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Its been a while since I had PCN, but I think July month is not so good for me, I had a Fixed penalty from police on sunday for stoping on a laybay near heathrow and today in post from westminister council for yellow box junction.

 

I won't say alot about yellow box ticket bcoz its my first and I have no clue how to deal with it.

 

So I am just posting the video.

 

 

 

 

Do you pros think I have any chance to challange this?

 

Berkely Street is a side street and I was emerging onto picadilly which is a main street.

 

Please ADMIN let me know if its not right to post video here.

Edited by innocent_man
Link to post
Share on other sites

Video is fine if you don't mind your reg plate being seen.

 

I believe box junctions say 'do not enter box unless exit is clear' so on that basis, you have no challenge.

 

If something further up had stopped them moving, you would have been blocking any further movement of traffic.

 

Mind you, going by the speed with which the camera zoomed in on your plate, they were sitting there waiting for this.

 

Also, as you didn't impede anything and were only stopped for seconds, I think you should appeal anyway.

 

See, this says to me that this just for making money, did you see these threads ?

 

http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2373711/Barnet-Council-parking-permits-price-hike-ruled-illegal-stealth-tax.html

 

The second one especially shows (and the courts says so) that it is just for profit.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for quick reply. I will read the links now.

 

about the number plate thing, I blv people who come to this site are not to do plate scaming or cloning. they are also people like me who have been biten by the local authorities. So i guess its ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link dosn't work for me.

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link dosn't work for me.

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

have a look now

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Conniff I'm afraid. They will say you didn't leave sufficient space between you and the silver car in front which appears to be slowing down before you entered the box.

 

Please Note

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree there looks little room for appeal against that PCN as it seems clear that you could not proceed completely through the box before you entered it. The only thing in that video that surprises me is that the operator didn't also zoom in on the silver car who also failed to judge correctly that they could clear the box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The box looks non compliant its too big and should be to the corners of Berkeley st and not several meters before the corner on the approach up Piccadily.

 

One can argue that, on this junction vehicle turn right also from berkeley street to piccadily. So they cover the whole right hand turning too. As you can see here on street view.

 

Street View Link

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just joined this thread as I too have been given a penalty notice at the same Box Junction, Berkley Street into Piccadilly. I can't believe that the local authority is allowed to get away with this.

 

I happen to work very near to both this junction and the Arlington Street intersection into Piccadilly and both have exactly the same issue. Throughout most of the day, the traffic volume along Piccadilly is so severe that on nearly every change of lights at these junctions it is almost impossible to turn left out of Berkeley Street or right out of Arlington Street without stopping in the box junction.

 

If you follow the letter of the law, you simply wouldn't be able to make the manoeuvre. needless to say, you would also have a line of infuriated motorists backing up behind you. The traffic lights and the flow along Piccadilly mean that just about every change of lights, the cameras will focus in on one or more vehicles and issue penalty notices. They must know that it is impossible for motorists to make the turn into Piccadilly, yet they still issue the fines. There must be some recourse surely???

 

Anyone tried a FOI request to determine how many motorists are fined each day at this junction? I was so annoyed, that I went and photographed 8 changes of lights yesterday just to prove my point. See

 

Box junction nightmare, penalty notice in the post! and Box junction nightmare, penalty notice in the post!

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they know it's impossible, they obviously studied the junction and decided this was the setup that would make them the most money.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

The car in front appears to be a relatuively new Jaguar, so I'm sure they don't just pick on expensive cars. I am not sure about the link to allowed appeals as this seems to focus on the wording of the law, points which i'm sure would be clear and well knownon a forum such as this.

 

The car in front of the jag had stopped as you commenced the manouvre so it should of been clear you wouldn't be able to clear the junction, the jag almost did so may have been let off.

 

I suggest following advice as to checking legality of junction and/or paying

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, Picadilly does not exist as it is written on the graphics generated name on the footage, it's Piccadilly. There is no Picadilly and Berkeley Street junction in the UK. Check the PCN to see if the primates have made the same error.

 

The junction shown goes from two lanes into three lanes on turning left, and so there should really have been some volume spare for everybody entering to complete. You could have been attempting to exit from lane two and enter lane two or three on Piccadilly, the car in front of you had already committed to lane three, but did not clear the yellow box exit completely, preventing you from turning into lane three, but more importantly lane two, where there appears to - just about - be a clear car's length.

 

You could also appeal on the moving image not showing the full junction at the time you commenced into the yellow box, as anything could have been happening elsewhere in the box (broken manhole, pedestrian losing control of a dog/child, or aliens landing at the start of an invasion). Unless they can give you unedited/raw footage showing everything from all positions (which may involve a different viewing angle) then you should take it further.

 

Dont forget the cameras are put in specific positions that cloud the true dimensions of a junction, the vehicles movement and the intentions of the driver, they are there not to ensure full clarity or enhance traffic flow, but to raise revenue for the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
First off, Picadilly does not exist as it is written on the graphics generated name on the footage, it's Piccadilly. There is no Picadilly and Berkeley Street junction in the UK. Check the PCN to see if the primates have made the same error.

 

The junction shown goes from two lanes into three lanes on turning left, and so there should really have been some volume spare for everybody entering to complete. You could have been attempting to exit from lane two and enter lane two or three on Piccadilly, the car in front of you had already committed to lane three, but did not clear the yellow box exit completely, preventing you from turning into lane three, but more importantly lane two, where there appears to - just about - be a clear car's length.

 

You could also appeal on the moving image not showing the full junction at the time you commenced into the yellow box, as anything could have been happening elsewhere in the box (broken manhole, pedestrian losing control of a dog/child, or aliens landing at the start of an invasion). Unless they can give you unedited/raw footage showing everything from all positions (which may involve a different viewing angle) then you should take it further.

 

Dont forget the cameras are put in specific positions that cloud the true dimensions of a junction, the vehicles movement and the intentions of the driver, they are there not to ensure full clarity or enhance traffic flow, but to raise revenue for the council.

 

sorry for late reply, was away for week.

thanks for reply. The word Piccadilly is written on the PCN so we cant argue on that.

 

my grace period of £65 is over anyway, so I will go ahead at least until adjudicator reject my appeal. I have 100% success record with adjudicator until with the help of you guys. So let see.

 

any advice writting a letter might help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...