Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

over payment of benefit worry.


tracieann
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

jabbajones thank you so much for your advice I haave been ill with worry for six weeks since all this happened.I always kept my hours to the minimum but I ended up being overpaid will no longer claim even if eligible as too scared now I have had my sons DLA reviewed cos I dont want him getting something he shouldnt.Do you defo think i wont here anything now thats a relief i think this website is amazing people on here so kind and helpful Thanks jabbajonea and everyone for your time and effort helping me:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tracieann, your overpayment letter sounds exactly like mine and I had an IUC first. At the top of my letter it said a civil penalty was not appropriate in this case and there was no penalty added on either nor was I given a caution or fraud mentioned on any of the paperwork. To be honest I think they are just trying to claw back as much money as they can even if it was gained from a mistake :(

 

DLA is not means tested so earnings/income are not taken into account so go ahead with your sons claim, don't be afraid :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi jadeybags and ta so much for your input its invaluable when someones been through it like ypo didnt you get prosecuted I wish they could realise what it does to someones life Yes there are people who set out to defraud hundreds and thousands of pounds but that is fairly rare surely . and the stress of waiting makes people ill Well I guess thats me vented No fraud was the last thing I would ever have done too much to lose not wise enough about payments pensions etc and going through it with our lovely Mum in law was my problem please add any input you feel can help ....as it does

 

No, no mention of prosecution ever. I had been overpaid for 2 years. begining of 2011 I had my IUC. I had started working part time end of 2008 after not working since 1994, when I left full time work 2 weeks before my first child was born. So I was a bit wet behind the ears (is that the right saying?) Didn't know they had worked my housing benefit out wrong from day one of me starting work, so where I should have been paying 20 odd quid a week towards my rent, I was paying nothing! And I had a few days off sick in the first couple of years, didn't get sick pay, so thought it would all even out when we got pay rises twice in those 2 yrs (Sainsburys, so nothing amazing & they never exactly advertised the fact we got pay rises) I was too lax in paying attention to changes & letting them know. Like tax credits changes too (although they're another lot that just pay more into your account without any notification)

Soon learnt my lesson to be one step ahead of them! They recently overpaid me again, even after me telling them what's what, but thankfully I know about Turn2us site now & was on the ball & made sure my landlords left my direct debit as it was, & not lower it to zero like they notified me they were going to do! then the other day got the over payment letter from the council, 70 quid. Surprise surprise!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks jadeybags and lifeisamess for your input ive asked them a lot of times when ive phoned normal carers allowance unit and debt management and all have said not marked for prosecution My anxiety issues make all this even harder for me like its not tough enough I start to obsess about things and become ill with stress , hopefully it helps i informed them when it came to light and have been open all the way through because my conscience wont let me do anything else So trying to chill now thanks to all you lovely people

Edited by tracieann
Link to post
Share on other sites

AGGH help ive had aletter today which scared me to death ive started paying back and made my first payment on 2nd july they recieved payment 4th july i rang to ask to confirm by letter which they did HOWEVER it has the sentence this payment is recieved without prejudice to any further action that may be taken in relation to this debt . It has started the whole thing off again worried sick scared of being prosecuted lady on phone says no its just a letter but im scared stiff again she says carry on paying and not to worry its eight weeks since i informed them but no iuc yet could they be planning just to prosecute and not tell me as ive already admitted being overpaid but not deliberately i cant settle at all please can someone advise is the wonderful Jabbajones around

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without prejudice means that they COULD take further action against you should an offence arise as a result of an overpayment.....

 

However that certainly doesn't mean they will & the info on the DM I sent you still stands.

 

They won't prosecute you without inviting you for an IUC first. But even if the worst case scenario happened & the IUC letter arrives, they would still have to prove guilty knowledge on your part to take it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think ive let myself relax too much with this just because i informed them of my overpayment as soon as i found out and have been open about it i think they are going to prosecute me i have spoken to many advisors from dwp and 99 per cent have said its not down as fraud i believed it too but why would it sat the without prejudice on letter if they werent planning something else it had taken me ages to calm down too the letter was a dm15 whatever that is oh God its scary

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh jabbajones great to hear from you sorry i hadnt read your post before i wrote this one above yes its been eight weeks since i informed them 7th june recieved op letter and i recieved this today thanking me for payment and terrifying me in the process is it usual to have iuc first and what offence would arise from it im sorry to be a pain but i trust your judgement a lot and also would the dwp advisors say no if it were planning to prosecute or not thanks so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

also wouldnt the fact that i told them mean they dont need to give me an iuc ive admitted been overpaid but it wasnt fraud so im being honest saying i had the money overpaid but not on purpose why would i tell them myself if it was fraud why would i ask them to check 5 years p60s if it was fraud why would i reapply for my sons dla to be assessed in case he was getting too much if i was defrauding them ive said plenty to them on the phone about how this came about as ive said in my story on here not once have i ever changed my story cos its the truth im told they tape the calls well ive been well upset on mine i can tell you but i need closure isnt there anyway i can get them to write saying im not been prosecuted for fraud if im not im gonna end up sectioned at this rate and im not joking please can i have your opinion jabbajones thanks

Edited by tracieann
Link to post
Share on other sites

tracieann,rest yaself easy girl,take a deep breath.........I actually had an interview under caution 3 years ago regards an overpayment of jsa and council tax benefit,they sent me out demand letters for repayment of several thousands of pounds these letters had,"without predujice" stamped on them,I paid the amounts off,in 3 years Ive heard nothing back,they got their money back,you just relax!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you citizenkain it helps that youve been there i have very bad anxiety problems GAD and OCD as well as depression and some thing like this just sends me off the scale when i first found out i spent a week researching prisons all i could think of was theyd take my son from me its called catastrophising and thats what you do sorry to ramble its just i wish i could get proper closure i feel i have to ring them for reassurance as i said 99 per cent have said its not down as a fraud but in my head i think well would they tell me anyhow its just fear of the worst happening thanks again for your kindness

Link to post
Share on other sites

The without prejudice phrase in the letter is entirely normal and covers themsleves. They have started to receive the overpayment back from you and I assume know when and how often future payments will arrive from you? If you continue paying as agreed a court would heavily frown on any court action taken by the DWP, having agreed a set arranagement and you keeping to it so if you keep to your repayment schedule then you should be fine. The words without prejudice just cover scenarios such as you failing to keep to your agreement by either stopping payments or making very late payments regularly, then the DWP can decide your repayments aren't reliable and they can choose to take you to court and the court then because of the 'without prejudice' statement made cannot penalise the DWP for not trying harder to come to an agreement, because they tried already iykwim.

So, keep to your agreement and make your payments regularly and on time and action is unlikely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so much abc123 i phoned and had a chat with a lady who said no prosecution marked for it just to keep paying its a fairly standard letter apparantly thank the Lord so going to chill a bit now thanks to all for your replies and support it helps so much to know your here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - I suspect that "Without Prejudice" simply means that they wish to reserve their right to take civil court action against you if you don't make repayments as agreed. It doesn't mean they will do this: as others have said, they're just covering themselves.

 

Note also that civil court action is not the same as criminal prosecution for fraud.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

antone many thanks for your supporting post i feel better that it seems a common enough practice to put this on a letter i have no intention to lapse on repayments i will pay the full amount back its just scary to a worrier with ocd and generalised anx disorder like me the way some of these letters are worded today ive had a nice day with my family something that has rarely happened since this

nightmare started thank you to all you kind people for your help its very much appreciated this sites amazing

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there anyway i can get dwp to send me a no prosecution pending letter or anything like that people say different things and thiough its been nine weeks since it started i still keep flaring up with the anxiety of it i just want to know its ok advice anyone thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...