Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PLEASE HELP!! ESA Tribunal Hearing in 17 days - Depression and Anxiety


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3934 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just read your reply, I gave a distance on my letter from a road to a road that they would know about and saying what would take my boyf 10 mins would take me 45 stopping and starting. is this enough?

 

That type of thing is good to include, but be careful - you've stated you can't mobilise more than 200 metres, and I doubt it takes your boyfriend 10 minutes to walk 200 metres, so mentioning how long it would take you to walk a distance that you don't actually walk, will just lead to confusion on the submission - better to say how long it takes your boyfriend to walk 200 metres and then how long it would take you. Also read the post above for other things to include.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you hon :-D

 

This is what I have now - I felt I had already included and explained some of the physical reasons so once I added some more on reading the paragraph through, it was doubled later in other words. I hope this is fine -

 

 

 

I had to delete it all names were in there omg

Edited by rockchick81
Link to post
Share on other sites

ps I have deleted this line out I don't like it Had I been asked I would have explained that

so it will run - how was I supposed toknow I was meant to bring it up first? I can not stand for long at all. After minutes my legscan not hold my weight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi nastagmite

 

I can walk to the top of my road slow, my partner looked it up on google maps to clairly and from my house to the top of the road is 150metres ish. at this time it hurts but its before this time im only out breath.

 

If I had to do more than 5 stairs, then that's me done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rockchick81, the content of the submissions looks good now. There are a few places where the words you've used don't exactly say what you want them to mean, but are easy fixes:

 

- The report states that I ticked on the ESA50 that I had problems with standing and sitting, however I reported no problems to the healthcare

professional. I was not asked these questions about my problems or given an opportunity to explain and how was I supposed to know I was

meant to bring it up first?

 

I would change this to:

 

- The report states that I ticked on the ESA50 that I had problems with standing and sitting, however, I was not asked any questions about these problems or given an opportunity to explain and how was I supposed to know I was meant to bring it up first?

and this:

At the time I had not been assessed on it but now I have, another doctor has advised me my standing and walking problems is because of my weight.

to this:

At the time I had not been diagnosed, but now another doctor has advised me my standing and walking problems is because of my weight.

And this I would add a bit on the end:

-The report states that I am currently able to run around the block. I stated that I walk as fast as I can round the block because of my fear of

going outside, but my fastest speed is still very slow, and I don't walk more than 200m.

And here I've replaced the word 'oven' with 'hob' as it paints a clearer picture:

The very last time I used my parents oven was when I put the hob on instead of the oven and the hob had a glass lid which had been left

down.

I've only suggested changes where it affects the meaning of what you're trying to say - it's best that you sound like you on the page and not me. But you don't have to take any of these suggestions on board if you prefer your version, ok.

Oh and you've left a couple of town names on there near the end, just in case you didn't want to leave them on there, you can edit them out.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you we will do this and then print is off ready for cab today, Some one suggested and I have also hand written a daily day thing journal check with cab and maybe include this in my submission too. be glad when its all gone off, hoping cab will fax it so it free or we might just do it recorded delivery.

 

Do we then to call tribunal a few days after to make sure they have received it??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you we will do this and then print is off ready for cab today, Some one suggested and I have also hand written a daily day thing journal check with cab and maybe include this in my submission too. be glad when its all gone off, hoping cab will fax it so it free or we might just do it recorded delivery.

 

Do we then to call tribunal a few days after to make sure they have received it??

 

At this stage, I would just make sure you have copies with you on the day of tribunal.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from cab omg that took ages!!!!

 

The lady there had prepped many for these tribunals and was really happy with my submission and what I had there. So a MASSIVE thank you for this site exsisting and esp for your advice estellyn, I would not have made it without you!! xx

 

Submisson and day diary is all posted of (a copy each) to the main centre and the centre I will be attending, both on recordered delivery.

 

Also have a copy of this and will print of 2 more.

 

So have copies of submission and diary, they already have the 70 page atos and dwp stuff INC my doctors letter at the time.

 

Hoping that will all be enough. She was really impressed with the submission, the only thing that will let me down is if I stuff up the answers by answering them in a way that may be took the wrong way, talking without thinking.

 

Think I can breathe now??

 

Hugs everyone in the help with this xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again, you seem to be making good progress with this. :) You were lucky to see the right person at the CAB, some people here wait ages.

 

If you haven't already, you might want to thank Estellyn by adding to her reputation points. Click on the star on the bottom left of one of her posts and leave a short message.

 

Please continue to keep us posted.

 

HB

  • Confused 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from cab omg that took ages!!!!

 

The lady there had prepped many for these tribunals and was really happy with my submission and what I had there. So a MASSIVE thank you for this site exsisting and esp for your advice estellyn, I would not have made it without you!! xx

 

Submisson and day diary is all posted of (a copy each) to the main centre and the centre I will be attending, both on recordered delivery.

 

Also have a copy of this and will print of 2 more.

 

So have copies of submission and diary, they already have the 70 page atos and dwp stuff INC my doctors letter at the time.

 

Hoping that will all be enough. She was really impressed with the submission, the only thing that will let me down is if I stuff up the answers by answering them in a way that may be took the wrong way, talking without thinking.

 

Think I can breathe now??

 

Hugs everyone in the help with this xxx

 

You've done well getting it all done. Fingers crossed.

Edited by estellyn
  • Confused 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

i used to be big (23 half stone ) i went on the orlistat. i lost 7 stone 7 pounds in a year with this medication it saved my life really as along as you stick to the rules of having no more than 5% fat per meal you will be ok and you must have calorie controlled diet with this too.

 

if you eat more than the 5% of fat per meal you do get a fatty like oil substance that can be uncontrollable at times especially when you have to go to the toilet and it is hard to hold things when this happens stick to the rules and you should be ok with it just though id mention it as its worked wonders for me

 

good luck

Edited by time4change2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response swinginapig, yes I thought it would be overwhelming it was a headache getting it on here, also I think the first post which is my letter and drs note is the main bit. The rest is for the ppl who want to see the atos medical which I don't think is that important. um I tried looking up welfare rights in my area nad all I get is my CAB beaureau, is this correct or are there a different batch of ppl somewhere. Also do I have to send my letter of um, flaws into tribunal 7 days before my hearing or on the day x

Usually there is Welfare Rights at your Local Council Offices???? but CAB will also be able to help you. Yes make sure your submission is with the Tribunal at least 7 days before the hearing, take copies with you on the day, again good luck...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually there is Welfare Rights at your Local Council Offices???? but CAB will also be able to help you. Yes make sure your submission is with the Tribunal at least 7 days before the hearing, take copies with you on the day, again good luck...

 

Hello there.

 

I'm not sure of the current position after a funding cut a while back. More and more people seem to be finding Welfare Rights with their local CAB.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone. so much.

 

One more Q, sorry, summit else that is worrying me today.

 

What are the options either way if I pass or fail??

 

IF I fail my tribunal, can I reclaim esa again??? and whats the rules, grounds and situation on that?? and how do I do it?? Can I reclaim on same things or does it have to be worsened sicknote (which is my mobility has grown worse in 3 months)?? I been appealing since november when it was first stopped so to speak before going on appeal rate, its just, I just thought about my prescriptions that I rely on!! If my esa gets stopped, I wont be able to get prescriptions with no income, what can I do? or help my dad pay his rent then I will be a MASSIVE burden on my parents.

 

What would be my options?? xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Yes, you can reapply if your condition has worsened or you have a new one.

 

There's also a 6 month rule for reapplying after you've been turned down and I can never remember when the 6 months run from. I hope someone will be along to bail me out later.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Yes, you can reapply if your condition has worsened or you have a new one.

 

There's also a 6 month rule for reapplying after you've been turned down and I can never remember when the 6 months run from. I hope someone will be along to bail me out later.

 

HB

 

From the date on the letter telling you you've failed the atos assessment.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...