Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC late filing penalties of self assessment - freddies DCA chasing me


liddz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3881 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After receiving(and ignoring) several threatening letters from FI I have decided to respond to them by letter. I do not want to phone them and go through what would undoubtedly be listening to their bully tactics over the phone which would result in me telling them to 'foff'!

 

My current debt with them is £1200 from the ridiculous HMRC late filing penalties of self assessment forms etc which has now been filed, although I seem to still be accumulating interest on the debt?!

 

As I was laid off in November my only source of Income at the moment is Job Seekers Allowance which gives me £280 per month, and £200 of this goes to the parents for rent(forced to move back home :x). Due to my lack of income Ive decided to offer them a repayment plan of £50 per month and this is the letter I have written:

 

Fredrickson International Limited

PO Box 260

Weybridge

Surrey

KT13 0YH

20/05/2013

 

 

Ref: Account No: ****************

 

 

Dear Fredrickson International,

 

 

I have been receiving letters regarding my HMRC debt of £1200, I fully intend to repay this debt but at the moment I am unemployed. My only source of income Is Job Seekers Allowance at £280 per month, 200 of which goes to my parents for rent. I do not currently have a bank account and my JSA is paid into a post office account, therefore I would like to request a payment card where i could pay £50 per month towards this debt until I find full-time employment where I would then increase my repayments. Also I do not currently have a contact number as my mobile phone contract has ended and I cannot afford to set up a new one, so further correspondence would have to be by e-mail or via letter. I hope this is all satisfactory as it is the best I can do due to my current circumstances.

 

 

Yours Faithfully, ***********

 

 

I'd appreciate some advice on whether or not this letter is correct in what i should be sending etc, thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

I can only offer you my personal experience and opinion.

Hmrc are very stubborn and hard to deal with,

I wouldnt even mention your total income and outgoings unless they ask u for a I&E even so would be very basic.

 

Can you realistically afford and keep up with £50 a month? As that is abit high in my opinion. If you can keep up the payments you would run into more hassle with them.

 

I would be very breif and to the point and just say in writing never phone, that you are in financial hardship and are in reciept of benefits and i would make a substanually lower offer not only will you have some back money should you need it but you also have a lower figure to pay each month.

 

Hope this helps other will advise soon i would imagine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry just to correct my earlier post

 

I mean to say if you cant keep uo that figure u would get more hassle.

Just be breif and blunt like they are never let them tell you how much to pay. You can only pay would you can resonably afford.

Stone=no blood

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying, FI are collecting the debt on behalf of HMRC and I would prefer to deal with HMRC instead of a DCA. Would HMRC be willing to set up repayment plans for such a low amount? They're usually quite stubborn from personal experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying, FI are collecting the debt on behalf of HMRC and I would prefer to deal with HMRC instead of a DCA. Would HMRC be willing to set up repayment plans for such a low amount? They're usually quite stubborn from personal experience.

 

Hi

Yes if they are only acting on behalf of HMRC you can deal with the directly, never pay a DCA.

 

Write to HMRC with relevent details need such account no etc etc an then just a brief overview of your situation. Keep it breif and to the point.

 

State that you are in financial hardship and in reciept of benefit.

Exact amount and outgoings do not need to be mentioned unless the ask u for income and expenditure which only needs to be very breif.

 

Make your offer of payment and stress that this is what you reasonably afford. They cant make you pay any more then what you can spare.

 

Which is why i ask can u realisticly afford to pay £50a month and keep that up as if you cant you would run into more hassle from then.

Be persistent and dont let them pressure you into paying more of any demands they may say.

Your showing willingnes to pay at the end of the day.

They are very hard and stubborn but like iv said be persistent! And state you will only communicate in writing or via email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I wouldn't offer to pay them that amount. I have Fredrickson International collecting a couple of debts from me on behalf of a couple of companies and when I told them my situation they accepted token payments of £1 per month and asked should my circumstances change then to phone call them back and increase the amount to whatever I can afford. They can't take from you what you don't have. Remember after paying your parents rent you still have to buy clothing for yourself etc.

Their letters are not nice but I found them very reasonable when dealing with them over the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi liddz and Heamoor,

 

You may already know that there is an appeal going on about the self assessment late filing penalties. I had taken my appeal to the tribunal and my case has been stayed twice due to the other cases.

 

I'm assuming you didn't owe them any tax and the penalties are just for late filing?

 

I think it is absolutely iniquitous that they charge daily interest on a penalty. :mad2: It's this aspect which is being challenged. HMRC is now appealing against this decision which went against them.

 

http://www.rpc.co.uk/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=722&Itemid=129

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that bit was for liddz, and I added you in afterwards. :-)

 

If it's been over a month I would send them a chaser. It shows you are doing all you can to deal with the situation. Are they adding interest on a daily basis?

 

I'm arguing the year when they brought in the penalties for late filing. I'm up to date on the tax and everything else has been filed. Honestly, you'd think they would give some credit for everything else being in order, but no......

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are charging you daily interest they (should) have an obligation to reply to your letter.

 

I think you may have to call them, but you could try a recorded delivery letter first. They are not all awful. I've found a couple to be quite helpful. You'll never get the same one twice so you could try calling and if they are dreadful you could hang up and call back to get a different one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They make it so easy to contact them, don't they? Like you I've spent hours on hold for them, and of course now they are on 0845 numbers so we are being charged for the privilege of holding on for them. :mad2: I told them I was going to charge the phone calls as an expense and they didn't like that at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 0845 thing is kinda sad, really, because it was originally set up to benefit those who call. Of course, now that most folks are using mobiles, it doesn't benefit them at all.

 

One thing we used to mention at those useless "tell managers how to make things better" sessions was that the enquiry lines should switch to 0800 and then we should work out a deal with the mobile operators, like we did with new claims lines, to make them free.

 

Nothing ever came of it, of course. DWP management holds its line staff in only slightly better regard than it holds claimants. But we were getting sick of being shouted at about this very topic.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...