Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell chasing Lloyds 2007 CC debt - **agreed SB**


pigginpie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3688 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sent a cca request this morning , once they recieve that am i right in thinking they cant issue legal proceedings untill they dealt with the request

 

I don't think an outstanding CCA req would prevent them, but it would not be a good idea. If they issued a court claim and then could not satisfy the CCA request they should lose.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could seek a judgement but would not be able to enforce it.

 

 

What is showing on your credit reference files.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah credit files say lowell bought the debt in august 2012 the debt defaulted 26 march 2008

So off CRA files this month.

 

 

Taking the default date (as some will claim starts the 6 year time span) it will be SB 28/03/14, but if the last payment date is correct then it is already SB.

 

 

I can draft you a letter to "test" this which will not affect the status of the debt at all and may well rid you of this right now.

 

 

just let me know if you want this.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So off CRA files this month.

 

 

Taking the default date (as some will claim starts the 6 year time span) it will be SB 28/03/14, but if the last payment date is correct then it is already SB.

 

 

I can draft you a letter to "test" this which will not affect the status of the debt at all and may well rid you of this right now.

 

 

just let me know if you want this.

 

Yes please brig :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK!

 

 

Private & Confidential

Ms Sara de Tute

Director of Legal & Compliance

The Lowell Group

Enterprise House

1 Apex View

Leeds

LS11 9BH

 

 

 

 

Date........:

 

 

Ref: use theirs.

 

 

Re: Alleged debt originating from an account with LLoyds.

 

 

Dear Ms de Tute,

 

 

I refer to recent correspondence from Lowell in regard to this alleged debt, please take note I do not acknowledge any debt to Lowell.

 

 

Having reviewed my credit history I have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred, therefor no payment or offer of payment will be made now or in the future.

 

 

I would remind you that should Lowell dispute the status of the alleged debt the onus of providing unequivocal proof that this alleged debt is not statute barred falls entirely upon Lowell, I do not have to prove anything.

 

 

Allegations of " mysterious" payments that have restarted the Limitations "clock" will be totally refuted

 

 

I am fully aware of the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2006 (updated Nov.2012) and refer you to Appendix B, which deals with the pursuit of statute barred debts.

 

 

Send by recorded/signed for post and check delivery.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant i will get this sent in the morning , thank you brig

Happy to help, please let us know the outcome.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends if the member of staff who can read at the DCA is at work!

10 -14 days approx.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys got a reply from my SB letter i sent , it states the customer relations team now owns my complaint and the senior customs relation officer will be making a thorough investigation into my concerns and will be in touch with his resolution after his investigation , is this just a standard reply from a statute barred letter , thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just playing for time to see if they can create a " mystery" payment I expect, quite normal for Lowell.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can claim all they like, they have to PROVE it's NOT sb, they often talk the talk, but they never walk the walk else they would all be in prison for fraud.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noddle usually lags behind in updating their files, so if it's not showing on Experian then IMO this is a good sign.

But you can never be to careful with the sordid world of debt collection and the flogging on of lemon debts to their bezzy mates!

Get a print off of it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

:thumb: Keep that letter very safe!

It isn't unknown for them to sell it on to another degenerate..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...