Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Put in the WRAG after appeal, but think I should be in the Support Group


Fairywings54
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4021 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

I had an ATOS Medical last September and was found fit for work. I appealed last October straight away on a GL24 and last week was awarded WRAG, bu,t and this is the but,I have new evidence come to light to state that I should not at any cost work and my GP supports this.

 

If I appeal again to be placed into the Support Group how do I do this and will I lost my benefit in the meantime that I have just fought for and won? I know that I have to see a personal advisor to continue to receive my benefit but my GP says that this is not possible. Where do I stand now? Any help would be appreciated.

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You were placed in WRAG on the evidence available at the time of your failed WCA assessment. If evidence of further debilitation is now available, than you can provide that to the DWP as a change in your condition. I'm not entirely sure of the fancy word for this but suspect it's along the lines of a 'supersession' ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much RaeUK but I am still unsure of what to do next as I see my GP tomorrow morning again and I have to ask for his help yet again because there is no way I can attend to see a WRAG personal advisor. I realise that I have been deemed fit for some kind of work BUT it still remains that I have been to the hospital and my GP says it is impossible for me to work and my new x-rays demonstrate this quite clearly. I have had a few falls this year which my GP states are all to do with the nerves in my legs also, another reason he says I cannot work.

 

It took my six months to be placed into the WRAG Group but I should have been placed in the Support Group.

 

Where do I go from here?

 

Any help from you fellow caggers would be appreciated.

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much RaeUK but I am still unsure of what to do next as I see my GP tomorrow morning again and I have to ask for his help yet again because there is no way I can attend to see a WRAG personal advisor. I realise that I have been deemed fit for some kind of work BUT it still remains that I have been to the hospital and my GP says it is impossible for me to work and my new x-rays demonstrate this quite clearly. I have had a few falls this year which my GP states are all to do with the nerves in my legs also, another reason he says I cannot work.

 

It took my six months to be placed into the WRAG Group but I should have been placed in the Support Group.

 

Where do I go from here?

 

Any help from you fellow caggers would be appreciated.

 

Did it go to Tribunal, or did the DWP change their decision?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite I do meet one of those criteria that I have looked at even moreso now. This is a minefield to me though. I am on High Rate Mobility and Low Rate Care of DLA.

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP changed their decision and I got it in writing last week.

 

You can appeal this decision (from last week), as long as you can show you met the support group criteria at the time of the ATOS assessment (your gp may be able to help with this). Be aware, that at Tribunal, there is always a small chance of your whole ESA award being removed, so just be sure you meet at least one support group criteria, and have evidence to back it up, and can show that ATOS were mistaken in their assessment.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi estellyn I have evidence at the time of the ATOS assessment that states that I am on high rate dla mobility and low rate care and the ATOS assessor knew this full well but chose to ignore it. I was told at my full body scan last year before ATOS that I have bad knees and also at my Bone scan.

 

Anyhow to cut a long story short I now find myself in the position whereby I am being put forward for a double knee replacement by my GP due to the recent x-ray results. I cannot walk far and also have a blue badge. My GP is certain of the fact I meet one of the conditions in the support group criteria and so is my pain management consultant who has agreed to place me on Morphine.

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi estellyn I have evidence at the time of the ATOS assessment that states that I am on high rate dla mobility and low rate care and the ATOS assessor knew this full well but chose to ignore it. I was told at my full body scan last year before ATOS that I have bad knees and also at my Bone scan.

 

Anyhow to cut a long story short I now find myself in the position whereby I am being put forward for a double knee replacement by my GP due to the recent x-ray results. I cannot walk far and also have a blue badge. My GP is certain of the fact I meet one of the conditions in the support group criteria and so is my pain management consultant who has agreed to place me on Morphine.

 

As nystagmite says, your DLA is ignored for assessment purposes, and to get the support group descriptor for mobilising, you have to explain and provide evidence as to why you can't mobilise using a wheelchair - whereas for DLA, they don't take ability to use wheelchair into account.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to say that being in the wrag doesn't mean you are fit for work, it is part of esa. You would need to attend some face to face interviews just to talk about what could help you prepare towards work at some stage in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone

I had an ATOS Medical last September and was found fit for work. I appealed last October straight away on a GL24 and last week was awarded WRAG, bu,t and this is the but,I have new evidence come to light to state that I should not at any cost work and my GP supports this.

 

If I appeal again to be placed into the Support Group how do I do this and will I lost my benefit in the meantime that I have just fought for and won? I know that I have to see a personal advisor to continue to receive my benefit but my GP says that this is not possible. Where do I stand now? Any help would be appreciated.

 

Hi Fairywing54

 

Do not try to appeal the tribunal decision, not worth it. You need a new application to DWP to state that you have deteriorated medically since the assessment either using the ESA descriptors or Section 32 which I will explain later. This will be supported by medical evidence. Can you please let me know the exact wording of your tribunal judgement and which categories you were allocated points for. It is possible to be allocated to the support group, believe me. Think I can advise if I have a bit more info.

 

If you do get called for a WAG interview at the JobCentre and explain your problems to the adviser as they can be very helpful in supporting your case (they may not know this but they can) Take a friend if you can

 

CD

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CD

Thank you for your help. I did not go to Tribunal at all! I appealed on a GL24 and sent it in last October 2012. Lo and behold on April the 19th I was awarded back pay from last October and placed into the WRAG group. I have no letter giving me any points or anything other than the original one which said I had 6 points and was not entitled to ESA at all so I appealed straight away and got it back. I never knew it had been seen by a tribunal until the letter from the DWP stated that it had been seen by one. I can ask for the decision to be looked at again as I now have the evidence provided by my GP today. Is this any good? Any help for me is better than nothing I can tell you it is driving me nuts.

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you contact DWP and ask for a copy of the tribunal decision? Were you notified of a tribunal hearing at all? Why did you not attend? Ask for details of this. I would not recommend appealing a tribunal decision, this can take a while and is rarely overturned - it is far better to notify a deterioration in health to DWP since the original ATOS assessment and argue the reasons for being in the support group.

 

You can be in the WRAG group for a year after first claiming on benefit if this is NI contribution based (then you need to be in the support group). It is longer if income based, depending on your circumstances, but the support group is a slightly higher rate and you should receive less hassle. Being on DLA is different as many people on DLA can work, it is proving for ESA that being in work is not possible and would be detrimental to your health and well being

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you coledog for your answer to me, I have put together a letter tonight asking the questions you have raised above as I never attended a Tribunal and never knew one had taken place either until I received my letter of the decision informing me a Tribunal had placed me in the WRAG. I am going to send this out tomorrow and ask for the decision to be looked at again.

 

Yes this is contribution based as I was sacked from my job for being incapable of doing it last July 2012 so that's when I went on ESA at the assessment rate. This will come to an end in July 2013 according to my letter I received last week. I understand this and the reasons which is another argument for being placed in the Support Group.

 

I will keep everyone informed of how I am getting on and if it was not for this forum I think I would have gone completely insane months ago, I am doing this on my own without any help from outside organisations as they always seem to be too busy to help me and overstretched.

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

RaeUK I have the exact wording in my letter for you: " Your appeal has been heard by an independent appeal tribunal. The tribunal has decided that you are entitled to Employment Support Allowance". I never knew that this had happened, where, when or anything!!

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i did not Nystagmite, all I did was put in a GL24 in October 2012 and that was that until April 2013 when I was informed I had been placed into the WRAG group. How frustrating is that?

What will be will be and none of us can change the course of history or human nature:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i did not Nystagmite, all I did was put in a GL24 in October 2012 and that was that until April 2013 when I was informed I had been placed into the WRAG group. How frustrating is that?

 

If you didn't get a choice between paper and oral hearing, you can ask the Tribunal chair for the decision to be set aside and to have an oral hearing - the problem with this is that the whole decision would be set aside and you back to assessment rate ESA.

 

Your best and safest option in this case may be just asking for a new assessment based on worsening condition - this is refered to as asking for a supersession based on a change of circumstances (worsened condition).

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you didn't get a choice between paper and oral hearing, you can ask the Tribunal chair for the decision to be set aside and to have an oral hearing - the problem with this is that the whole decision would be set aside and you back to assessment rate ESA.

 

Your best and safest option in this case may be just asking for a new assessment based on worsening condition - this is refered to as asking for a supersession based on a change of circumstances (worsened condition).

 

Agree - this is what we need to get but need some details of the the decision they have made so as to argue the extend of the deterioration.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...