Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • as another of farages faragit reformatory boy shows his true colours Ian Gribbin, the party's candidate in Bexhill and Battle claimed * ' the country would be "far better" if it had "taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality" instead of fighting the Nazis in World War Two. err tell that to the russians - who did .. * said people should  “exorcise the cult of Churchill and recognize that in both policy and military strategy, he was abysmal”. * Praised Russian president Vladimir Putin as he: "understands the bonds that create more stable societies; the hypocrisy of the West is preposterous as we stare in the face daily the enormous economic equalities created by our deluded neo liberal ideas" and "if only the West had politicians of his class".   * 'women were the "sponging gender" and should be "deprived of health care". * "Men pay 80% of tax – women spend 80% of tax revenue. On aggregate as a group you only take from society. Less complaining please from the 'sponging gender'." - Wonder what his momma thinks of that?   On being caught out, cribbin initially refused to comment before belatedly and weakly 'apologising' A Reform spokesman said the comments were “written with an eye to inconvenient perspectives and truths”. Chairman Tice said “We’re really pleased with all candidates." Leader Farage seemed to think the greens vetting OUT and suspending 20 unsuitable candidates was a 'bigger problem' than reform not only leaving **** the unsuitable in abut also being apologists for them     Reform candidate says UK should have ‘taken Hitler’s neutrality offer’ WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK He also praised Russian president Vladimir Putin and described Winston Churchill as ‘abysmal’   Reform UK candidate apologises over Hitler neutrality comments WWW.BBC.CO.UK Ian Gribbin says his grandparents were "Russian Jews fleeing persecution" and his comments were taken out of context.  
    • do you ultimately want to keep the car?
    • Thank you!    It was bought on my debit card    
    • Hi. Welcome to CAG. How was the car purchased?  
    • Absolutely for the agreement they are referring to.... puts them on notice that this is going to be a uphill fight.   Andy 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New Time To Sign In.


yesitsme
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Went to sign in today. went through all the normal talk and then she told me that from today, when i sign on every two weeks i will be given a new time each and every time i go to sign on, she then told me that this is to keep you on your toes, :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I blame the black economy, we all know that every single person that signs on is working cash in hand, I would insist on a morning/afternoon slot so I could earn a half day at least, most inconsiderate of JCP if you ask me:lol:

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done nothing wrong, she told me that it is something new that is starting and it applies to everyone,

It was supposed to be humour. I know it's not funny.

 

So if it applies to everyone it's not a personal thing. We'll see if anybody else is experiencing the same.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are they going to work that is it applies to everyone.

Their computer system will go into melt down

 

It's no different to what they do now if you think about it, everyone has different signing on times anyway they are just changing the usually static individual ones from say Thursday at 10:30 to random at random.

 

The next time the Op goes to sign on they will flourish a large hat and invite the OP to select a folded piece of paper containing the next signing on 'opportunity' think of it as the Lotto with no prize attached.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might also mean there will now be more cases of people missing appointments or being late - more chance to sanction people.

 

I'd imagine this new scheme (if done wholesale) would make more work for the DWP. At present it's a 'regular', repetitive system; they know who is signing on any one day and it never changes - now they'll have to sort out the daily signings on an ever-changing basis. Increased scope for error on their part - I can imagine someone turning up correctly to be told 'we have no record of giving you that day and time to sign'. I'd advise everyone to get their signing time/date in writing and signed by the advisor.

 

Seems illogical to me..but since when did logic ever prevail in the DWP? Do they really think it will cut down on the 'cash in hand' brigade? Bless them for being so naive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well went back to sign on again today and asked about the new way to sign on, the evil bitch told me it was because this way you would get to see the same advisor each time. oh just great i thought i get to see the evil one each time. i then asked if all job centres are doing this she then said it is up to each job centre on what system they use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy! The rules shouldn't change according to individual jobcentres - they're all part of the DWP so should all be run in an identical way(whether good or bad). It's not so bad seeing the same advisor every week, as long as they're decent (luckily mine is). At least then you know who to blame if any errors happen on your claim; if you see a different advisor all the time they'll shift the blame onto someone else. Rule 1 of the JC advisors - 'Never admit your mistake'.

 

I hope they keep my signing-on time as it's very early in the morning. I always moan at having to get up and travel at that time but at least I'm done by 9:45 and the rest of the day is mine. Better than being dragged in at 3:30 and having to battle the workers going home on the bus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each JCP is able to set their own signing times it's down to lots of varying factors.

It can be based on staffing allocation, varying duties that members of staff that are required to do daily, it could be new claims taken in the morning and then signing in the afternoons for example.

Also some JCP offices can have a strict 5 minute appointment system for signing or time bands where you could be asked to attend in a 10 minute to 1 hour time bracket.

Sometimes when the client load increases it can be necessary to change things around to ensure that staffing levels are correct to accommodate the number of people expected in to sign to try to reduce queues and in turn frustrations of people who have had to wait about for a while.

It could also be a way of trying to reduce people being able to work cash in hand during office hours.

The only thing set by guidance is the signing day set by the last 3 numbers of the National Insurance number. Adviser appointments can be booked for any day or time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing set by guidance is the signing day set by the last 3 numbers of the National Insurance number.

 

I've been unemployed before and wondered why they always picked Thursday to sign...now I know! Thanks Flumps :)

 

(This must be a very long-standing rule as when I had a spell of unemployment in the 70's I signed on a Thursday too. Saturday (the best day) was giro day.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Went back in today to sign on and saw a new advisor, I then said i thought this new system that was in place was because you saw the same advisor each time, he then told me that they have got a few teething problems with it but they hope to get it to work soon, think i have heard that before somewhere,

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what is happening in the Job Centre I am at. Managed to change my time slot as I wanted an early morning one, which was accepted, only because someone else wanted a later time slot. Still pleased nonetheless. What they need to work on is meeting their schedule. I have signed on twice at the new time as I only recently started to claim again and I have had to wait for 25 - 30 minutes on both occasions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...