Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road after coming off the motor way, i noticed my car felt a little "weird" i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intolerant on date night, we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i haven't received anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. Should i query the ticket as i don't want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep quiet. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi estellyn,

this is what it states on my report from dwp,

THE LAW

employment s.allowance(transistional provisions housing benefit and council tax benefit)(existing awards)(no.2)Regulations 2010,regs5,6,7,13 and 15 and schedule 1

esa regs 2008 reg 19 and schedule 2 social security(credits)regulation 1975reg 8B

Link to post
Share on other sites

the stress that this is causing me is unbelievable, now i just burnt my potatoes, and have to start all over...there should be a law that can sue these atos people if a tribunal is successful. for stress damage

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi estellyn,

this is what it states on my report from dwp,

THE LAW

employment s.allowance(transistional provisions housing benefit and council tax benefit)(existing awards)(no.2)Regulations 2010,regs5,6,7,13 and 15 and schedule 1

esa regs 2008 reg 19 and schedule 2 social security(credits)regulation 1975reg 8B

 

OK. You don't need to worry about the regulations. This is what you need to do:

 

1) Look at the descriptors for the work related group and support group and see which ones apply to you.

 

2) Write down each descriptor that applies to you, one at a time, underline it, and then write underneath how that descriptor applies to you, give examples from your day to day life.

 

3) Write down whether your condition would be made significantly worse by being found fit for work, and also how having to go on the work programme would affect you (attending regular appointments etc), and if this would make your condition worse.

 

4) Look through the ATOS assessment and write point by point the things on the report that are wrong and why. This is where you discredit the report.

 

5) make a list of your supporting evidence.

 

6) Type up your notes - this becomes the statement of your case, called a 'submission'.

 

If you want help with any of the descriptors, just post and we'll talk you through it.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you estyllen,

this what i have done so far;

i got a letter from a psychiatrist who visited me at my home in early september..now i need to point out..i saw the atos person in july, , my money was stopped around beginning of september..i need to ask will it count that the psychiatrist saw me AFTER the atos person?the psychiatrists letter was long ,detailing my several conditions and mentioning that i was completely disabled by them... bear in mind my probs are mental ones...she went on to say that she could not advise a return to work unless things had greatly changed since she saw me...she also mentioned that i had cut my arm... indeed i had upon opening the atos letter about a week before... but atos only passingly mentions in their report that i said i cut my arm, we regret this... but it doesnt fulfill section 29 or words to that affect...as i i mentioned the psychiatrist letter was very long.. i posted to dwp... after they had turned down my review...

Also i wrote a long letter at beginning of appeal... detailing things i disagreed with... i have written a letter to my mp to be posted... i am seeing for the first time a care coordinator on wed. i see doc on monday asking for blk triangle letter to be signed or filled in... i need download that...i received letter from a therapist i was seeing prior to being elevated to secondary care....i must say; i was elevated to secondary care after the atos decision...can you tell me if all this stuff after the decision is as important as anything around the time of the so called atos exam? much appreciate this help... i feel im fighting for my life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you gone through the descriptors and written down how you fulfill them, giving evidence from daily life (points 2 and 3 in my previous post)- this the most important thing and is the backbone of your case. You can have letters of evidence saying you're unfit, and state what you think was wrong with the atos assessment, BUT, unless you show that you meet the criteria (and putting the case in writing is best) then your appeal will fail.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok...re the psychiatrist seeing you AFTER the atos assessment....not necessarily a problem. It depends on what your illness/condition is and HOW LONG you have had it, diagnosed or not. I had bipolar disorder, undiagnosed, but was obviously ill, it took me months to get an appointment with the community mental health team, get a CPN to make initial assessment and then the psychiatrist to formally diagnose and prescribe, but he was able to say that I had been ill with this for many years, and GP notes over many years confirmed a pattern of on and off meds for depression and anxiety, and I had been on those meds for a solid 3yrs before Atos found me fit (although unfit on BOTH previous assessments by them). .....Anyway it came down to the fact that I was obviously ill at the time of the assessment and that Atos/DWP hadn't made the right decision. I won my tribunal, as the time it took me to get all this diagnosis etc took longer than the time the DWP give to supply info before going to tribunal. Hope this helps. DONT GIVE UP!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i hope that i am forgiven for continualy posting on the subject... but i'm trying hard to get my case together right now... writing notes daily..

it mentions in my atos report..that as a post script (to my letter i sent disagreeing with their decision)

that i said i cut my arm upon reading that my esa was cut..or words to that affect...

This is true... i immediately slashed my arm... i am under so much pressure, i got ocd, social phobia, agrophobia and gender dysphoria...the gender dysphoria ,atos are not aware of... i sent long letter from the psychiatrist involved... to dwp... after the atos interview.

 

anyway, they say in the report... that i cut my arm "we regret it but it doesnt satisfy regulation 29".......... in my understanding its regulation 35 thats more important... i'm a bit confused here... anyway i been feeling suicidal all week actualy thinking it as a viable way out... doesnt the stress that caused me to cut my arm count for anything? they (atos)also use the fact that i use a computer against me... she asked me how i got my food... i replied online... which is true, i have no family or friends and i would need a bus to the shops and im not always comfortable with that..she said i "appear normal" normal complexion etc... i mean what's normal? my head is not in the right place so to speak and i dont know who i am... saw my doc today asked him to sign the blackk triangle letter... he was reluctant... of the legal side.... said he didnt know what the regulations were but he would do his own letter based on my condition...please can anyone help in any way? am i doing right things or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reg 29 relates to Limited Capability for Work (LCW), whereas Reg 35 relates to Limited Capability for Work Related Activity (LCWRA). If you are found to have LCW, you would be placed in the Work Related Activity Group, and if you are found to have LCWRA you'd be placed in the Support Group. Other than that, the regs are similar, stating words to the effect of "This person has a recognised medical condition which is untreatable" and/or "there would be significant risk to the health of the claimant or other people if the claimant was not found to have LCW/LCWRA." In both cases, the regs may be applied if the claimant does not reach the required 15 points (for LCW and Reg 29) or does not meet a LCWRA descriptor (for LCWRA and Reg 35).

 

We have heard of a few cases here where doctors were not keen to sign the Black Triangle letter. That's fair enough, I suppose, as it makes what appear to be legal statements and they are, after all, doctors and not lawyers.

 

Now when you appeal, you are arguing that the DWP and Atos got things wrong based on the information that was available to them at the time the assessment took place. If you cut yourself after, and as a result of, the Atos assessment, you can't argue that they didn't take this into account at the time. But this is crucial: although it can't be seen as direct evidence that the WCA was wrong, you should still provide them with the information because it gives some insight into your overall mental state.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks antone,

i think the stress has set off my ocd... im reverting back regressing or whatever...seeing a care coordinator for first time too this week... it just happenned that i have been put into secondary care... after the atos grilling..which was only 11 minutes, totell the truth i was overwhelmed by the fast direct questions i just cant see how i can explain myself like that...it says in the report she isnt qualified also at bottom..."restricted medical" whats that mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I don't understand. The report states the Atos HCP was not qualified to conduct the assessment? Are you sure that's what it means?

 

As to "Restricted Medical" I can't really say without context. In some cases, "Restricted" is used to advise DWP staff that the information should be treated with a particular standard of confidentiality. But I don't know for sure.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can they? i read that the atos person gave me no points and i see at least 2 i fit... one gives 15 points and other 6 points, yet she never even askked me about this side of things...i think too if i send info. later it counts...hope i'm right

Link to post
Share on other sites

best to keep to one thread here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...