Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that is the first final notice you have received you can probably expect two or thee more to follow. This to test your resolve. They are hoping that these frightening 😃 letters will scare you into paying. After the third or fourth final demand they then have to decide  whether to actually proceed with a court claim or forget about you for a while. You were not the driver, their PCN is non compliant .No biggy.Slam dunk win for you.
    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA & Pension


nancyspain
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3815 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have been on sickness benefit since 1989 and have recently been changed to esa. I have been in receipt of a company pension since that date also as I was retired due to ill health. The 1st benefit I received back then was invalidity benefit which as far as I know wasn't means tested, I was then changed too Incapacity Benefit & now ESA. I received a phone call during the week the 'Case Intervention Team' asking different questions about my income. I told them I was only in receipt of a pension ( of course they already Knew this that's why they phoned) they were quite rude about it telling me the onus was on me to inform them of any changes in circumstances. I honestly thought that because my pension didn't affect Invalidity Benefit it was the same for the other benefits I was changed to. They have now sent me a letter asking for last years P60. Could someone please advise as I am worried sick about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have been on sickness benefit since 1989 and have recently been changed to esa. I have been in receipt of a company pension since that date also as I was retired due to ill health. The 1st benefit I received back then was invalidity benefit which as far as I know wasn't means tested, I was then changed too Incapacity Benefit & now ESA. I received a phone call during the week the 'Case Intervention Team' asking different questions about my income. I told them I was only in receipt of a pension ( of course they already Knew this that's why they phoned) they were quite rude about it telling me the onus was on me to inform them of any changes in circumstances. I honestly thought that because my pension didn't affect Invalidity Benefit it was the same for the other benefits I was changed to. They have now sent me a letter asking for last years P60. Could someone please advise as I am worried sick about this.

 

Pensions have a nasty habit of reducing the ESA payments even for those that are claiming on a contribution basis!

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as i know its always been like that!! i know i had to declare my pension when i retired early with ill health, moving onto esa if you have any income expect to lose that money against esa payments, unless contributory payments which will only be paid for a year exactly...you can work out roughly what you will get with the website turn2us and inputting all the figures

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know when i claimed ib i had to declare any other income...though it didnt actually affect my ib...however as we all know esa is a totally different animal

 

It is possible to claim only ESA©, which is the nearest equivalent to the old Incapacity Benefit. As noted, IB was contributory, and if you didn't meet the conditions you'd be considered for Income Support based on incapacity. However, the claim process for ESA means that most people end up applying for both ESA© and ESA(IR).

 

My recollection is that first £85 per week of occupational pension income is ignored for ESA©, then 50% of any amount above that is fully taken into account. For ESA(IR) the full amount (net of tax) is taken into account and deducted pound for pound from benefit payments.

 

Nancyspain, it does sound like an honest mistake, but it may be the case that your pension might affect your benefit entitlement. You should make a full declaration of this ASAP.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:nancyspain:

 

Cos incapacity benefit is/was based on national insurance contributions we don't think of it as a means tested benefit but it's been 'means tested', for new claims, since April 2001. From Government archives;

 

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/FinancialSupport/DG_10016082

 

Continual claims/linked claims for invalidity/incapacity benefit since pre 6 April 2001 have transitional protection from deductions of employment n support allowance cos of pension income, so your occupational pension shouldn't affect your benefit entitlement at the point of conversion. Might affect your tax liability. Contribution based employment n support allowance is taxable (conversion awards of incapacity benefit weren't), which is probably why they want the P60.

 

From what you've written your only 'crime' is not declaring a non-existent change of circumstances. The claim form for invalidity benefit didn't ask about pension income. Neither, circa 2000, did Jobcentreplus send the notes sheet (page 6) to existing claimants;

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/advisers/claimforms/sc1_print.pdf

 

Shouldn't worry too much. From what you've written, there's no fraud or overpayment.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

Edited by **Margaret**
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Starryeyes info is correct, Occ Pens only affect non linking IB claims made after 6/4/01. Unfortunately some less experienced staff may not be aware of this.

 

I'm not sure if that transitional protection carried over to ESA though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Reassessment of incapacity benefits:

 

'where people who are eligible for ESA receive more on existing incapacity benefits than the appropriate ESA rate, their existing rate of benefit will be protected at the point of conversion'

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/ib-reassessment-information-pack.pdf

 

Tisn't exactly crystal clear from Government literature, but two claimants in my self-help group (one had an original claim for invalidity benefit, the other a late 90s claim for incapacity benefit) now have conversion awards of employment n support without deductions for pension income. :biggrin:

 

Not sure about the 'transition will run smoothly for all claimants' bit. One got told initially, that linking between benefits wasn't allowed and the other's just been asked for a Med 3 (unfit) note. :roll:

 

Onward n upward, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi, I know this is an old thread but I am looking for advice.

 

I was recently awarded ESA contributory in support group - rang DWP and they would not tell me the length of award and refused to send me the decision details as they said it was only needed for appeals. the added I could be reviewed at any time. Anyway after a chat with old work director and pension advisory service, I approached my former employer RBS about an ill heath pension. Emailed them a copy of my ESA50, award letter, consultants letter and to my surprise got an email today saying "Your application for ill health has been approved and a retirement quotation will be sent out to you by the end of this week". I was told that the RBS final salary scheme pay out on ill heath grounds as if you had worked till 60.

I have searched the internet and read the comments on this site but I am confused what happens to the ESA claim/award if I go ahead and take up the pension which could be worth anything from £250 up to £400 a week depending if there is a lump sum option. (based on my 2012 pension forecast)

I do not want to ask the DWP given they where unhelpful with the ESA award and my local CAB are unable to assist as they are swamped with other ESA & Benefit claims which I fully understand. Had I known the pension option was there 8 years ago I would have not gone through the ESA stress.

Any guidance would be appreciated

regards

Stig

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I know this is an old thread but I am looking for advice.

 

I was recently awarded ESA contributory in support group - rang DWP and they would not tell me the length of award and refused to send me the decision details as they said it was only needed for appeals. the added I could be reviewed at any time. Anyway after a chat with old work director and pension advisory service, I approached my former employer RBS about an ill heath pension. Emailed them a copy of my ESA50, award letter, consultants letter and to my surprise got an email today saying "Your application for ill health has been approved and a retirement quotation will be sent out to you by the end of this week". I was told that the RBS final salary scheme pay out on ill heath grounds as if you had worked till 60.

I have searched the internet and read the comments on this site but I am confused what happens to the ESA claim/award if I go ahead and take up the pension which could be worth anything from £250 up to £400 a week depending if there is a lump sum option. (based on my 2012 pension forecast)

I do not want to ask the DWP given they where unhelpful with the ESA award and my local CAB are unable to assist as they are swamped with other ESA & Benefit claims which I fully understand. Had I known the pension option was there 8 years ago I would have not gone through the ESA stress.

Any guidance would be appreciated

regards

Stig

 

Just wanted to add, I don't want ESA if I get the pension so I never have to face or deal with them again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to add, I don't want ESA if I get the pension so I never have to face or deal with them again

 

If you don't want ESA then it's pretty straightforward. Once your pension is in payment, simply contact the DWP to close the ESA claim.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...