Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car sold with faults at time of sale?


ntlg*
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I purchased Renault Megane Dynamique from a small dealer on the 25th of Feb 2012. The MOT was passed on the same day.

 

I have had the results back from the MOT today and the car has failed on 3 points. The an off side front coil spring has snapped (the garage advised that it was dangerous to drive with this fault), the brake light switch is faulty and the steering lock also needs to be replaced.

 

My issue with this is that I purchased the vehicle with a provisional license, and the intent to learn and pass in the car. Due to random circumstances this did not happen and the car has mostly been off road for a year. I passed on the 8th of Feb and have driven the car on short trips since then.

 

I have just checked the paperwork and the total mileage on the car is around 1300 in 12 months (there were 2 longer distance trips with friends driving).

 

My query is firstly, can anyone advise how dangerous the car was to drive with the coil spring fault? How likely is it that the faults were present at the time of sale considering the low useage and would I be able to prove this if proceeding with an AA independent report, would this help to show that these issues were present at the time of sale?

 

Any information you could offer would be incredibly helpful. I apologise if these are idiotic questions but I am new to the world of both cars and MOTs so I want to have as much knowledge to hand before I call the dealer tomorrow to see if a compromise can be reached in regards to repairing the faults.

 

I initially emailed the dealer earlier today with the results of the MOT and an outline of my issue and they asked me to call them. I have not yet done so as I wanted to look into the details of the fault and to look through all the paperwork I have from the sale.

 

I have since drafted the below which I plan to email tomorrow and then follow up with a phone call later in the day, any feedback on the below would also be appreciated:

 

 

Hi,

 

 

I apologise for not calling yesterday, I was checkingthrough all of the paperwork that came with the vehicle at the time of sale.

 

 

I appreciate some time has passed since the sale of the carbut as per my previous email this car has been mostly off road since the saledate of the 25th of February 2012.

 

 

The purchase paperwork and DVLA paperwork has the mileagelisted as 50,282 and this is currently 51,768. So you can see this car has nothave enough use for these faults to naturally develop since the date ofpurchase.

 

 

It is my right,under the Sale of Goods Act 1979, to expect the second hand car to be ofsatisfactory quality (taking into account its age and mileage), meet anydescription given to me at the time of sale and to be fit for the purpose, thereforeI should expect to be able to get from A to B safely.

 

 

The MOTinspection carried out on the 25th of February 2013 showed that an offside front coil spring is required as the current one has snapped. I have alsobeen informed by the garage that it is dangerous to drive a car in thiscondition. The cost for this repair is quoted at £139.60 including Vat. A brakelight switch is also required as the brake lights are inoperable, which wouldbe £42.12. The final part required is asteering lock, but this repair has to be done via a Renault dealer who I havecontacted for an approximate cost.

 

 

As it has beenover six months since the purchase I appreciate that it is up to me to prove thatthese faults were present on the vehicle when it was sold. I will call later tosee how you wish to proceed with my complaint before taking this further but Iwould intend to contact the AA to carry out an independent report which wouldestablish the condition of the vehicle when it was sold Vs the time passed andmileage logged.

 

I would likefor arrangements to be made for the repairs to be carried out at no cost due tothe fact that these issues were present at the time of sale, whether you agreeto carry out these repairs or refund me for any costs accrued.

 

If we are unable to come to an agreement I will contactTrading Standards later today and make arrangements with the AA for theindependent report to be completed, I will then follow up with official letterto your registered business address confirming my intent to take legal action.

 

I believe the car (Reg FD04 ZFP) was not fit for purpose or ina road worthy condition at the time of sale. I also intend to contact VOSA andthe department of Transport to advise that the MOT Carried out on the 25/02/11by Christchurchgarage resulted in a dangerous car being passed as roadworthy.

 

 

I look forward to speaking to you later and hope we can cometo a satisfactory conclusion.

 

 

Many Thanks.

 

 

Lucy

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I don't think you'll have much luck with the dealer. Even though the car has been off the road for a while coil springs can snap at any time. You have done 1300 miles in it and the dealer has no way of knowing whether you have driven over a deep pothole, up a kerb or suchlike to cause the break.

 

As far as the brake light switch is concerned this could be due to it standing for such a long time. I'm not sure that the steering lock is part of the MOT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no idea if the coil springs on your car, are anything like the ones on a Renault "Kangoo" van, but I've had 4 Kangoo's, and three of 'em have had a coil spring snap, and two were only discovered at MOT time.

 

Each was replaced by a second hand one, by my local chap, and I simply put them down as part of the running costs of a Kangoo.

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Coil springs in Renault megane are a common fault, I have 2 meganes at the minute both off them have a problem with the steering lock again a common fault. The brake light switch is an easy fix just up behind the brake pedal couple of wires to unclip pop a new one in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just tead the letter you have written, a Renault megane spring costs between £18 and £25 it would take a good mechanic about 30 minutes to change it. You could buy a brake light switch from a breakers for a fiver and fit it yourself. The steering lock is the most expensive part but I can't see how the steering lock has anything to do with an mot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is up to you the buyer to 'prove' that the faults were there at the time of purchase and I would suggest that is an impossiblity. After this length of time you will have been deemed to have accepted the car.

Any assistance offered by the seller will be purely as a gesture of goodwill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...