Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, relenting on my above irritated post ... It's worth defending it.  At the very least they are likely to offer a deal. Plus  PE have added two completely invented amounts.  The £100 charge has morphed into £125.  Then they've added £50 legal representative's costs although they have no legal representative.  Even if it went all the way to court and you lost, the  judge would likely disallow the made up £25 + £50. Please fill in the sticky as dx asked. Then dx will be on with details of how to defend.
    • Quite interesting that the Conservative East Midlands  Mayor candidate doesnt mention conservative on his promotion LOL   but he does claim that he, a Conservative politician, is the man to fix the 14 years of Conservative devastation of the region - inc 'fixing' problems inc the utter devastation of the roads, bus and train services that his party have  imposed   Must all rotate around the meaning of fixing he actually means .. fixing noun dishonest activity to make certain that a competition, race, or election is won by a particular person:   .. or perhaps he just means 'fixing' - preventing change
    • Yes, absolutely normal for them to waste everybody's time and money by asking for more time – which they are entitled to do, of course – but it is simply a waste of time. They use prepared template defences. They know they are in the wrong but they simply want to make your life tough because they don't care about you. However do keep an eye out. You never know there is just a 1% chance that they could miss the deadline in which case you should apply for judgement immediately.
    • Will check back in when the SAR from MCB is back and get advice on how to raise the formal complaint and what to say x
    • With the best will in the world stop being an idiot.   Feeling bad because of a soulless entity that couldn't give a **** about you.   Life happens, it's how we move on.   SAR to MCB. Once info is back, raise a formal complaint.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We'd be very pleased if you would post up the actual response for us - without identifiers, of course.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completed questionnaire posting tomorrow I have 5 in all . A copy of this sheet will be attached to the relevant loan . Let's see what it brings forth this guy could sure do with some cash

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Unbelievable!!!! Sent claims Letter of authorisation with my date of birth etc for security. Today I get a call on my mobile asking for my friend by name . I iknew it was Halifax so I said you have aletter of authority you can speak to me. No we have to speak to him first thats our procedure. How ridiculous I have had letters acknowledging all his claims. All the paperwork for his SAR was sent to my address. I particularly asked that they do not call him as he cant speak on the phone due to a brain operation which has left him unable to hold a conversation and he just get tongue tied on the phone. I al;so told them if they wish to ask any questions then do it in writing and he has stated the reasons for misselling on his questionaire. What is thier game. They even wrote and asked for a letter of authority for his TMp claim which we sat and wrote by hand and sent to them what use are these letters ?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Good morning

 

All the loans were successful. So really pleased.

 

Phoned yesterday as 8 weeks is up.

Was told they are defending the TMPP

. Still not got letter.

 

Whilst going through paperwork I noted that he had contents insurance as it was on his expenditure sheet for mortgage .

Contents insurance is charged as a seperate entity on his mortgage account.

So he didnt need it as he already had it.

Can this be claimed for?

As soon as letter arrives I will put up as I will really need some help .

 

I will go to FOS as this will be a hardship case. but lets see what Halifax have to say first.

 

So odd that 5 loan PPIS paid with no problem

 

. Would be grateful for input re Contents Insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly know dual building can be

so I cant see why dual contents cant.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well still not received final decision due 18 th I phoned and asked where the letter was posted on 12th second class asked for copy to be sent special delivery to I have to wait 7 to 10 working days from date of letter is this a new ploy from lloyds to delay things past the 8 weeks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Halifax received this morning

. Really interesting.

 

They have upheld the pip part of TMPP

but not the seperate Ppi they had charged on the mortgage

how can that be .

 

Didn't realise they were charging twice .

 

So now going to respond to their final decision give them 14 days and then ombudsman.

 

How can they uphold one and not the other ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Halifax called me asked me if I could ask Friend questions and relay answers.

Ridiculous explained in another town dont see him that often.

 

 

Told them thier paragraph in their letter stating that had they been able to speak to him

the outcome may have been different was unfair especially after I had stated that any questions should be put in writing

and answers would be sent immediately in writing right from the very start

 

 

.I also asked where their proof was in their reasons for declining the claim.

 

 

They answered very difficult it was 1998.

The TMPP they have paid was bought out in 2001 when he remortgaged so they paid that as they had duplicated PPi .

That being the case then surely my friend was not aware he had it either if they werent aware.

 

 

Now decided they are going to mail me the questions .

 

 

This is ridiculous what sort of questions need answering. !!!!!

 

Ready for ombudsman. I Think.

This guy is certainly being treated unfairly because he has a condition which does not allow him to speak on the phone .

 

 

Any idea what these questions can be .

 

 

I do know a friend of mine had a call and was asked the same question over and over again which they cant do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...