Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is my Form 4 complaint justified? **Result + Compo Award**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3873 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Being new here, I will do my best to get the detail to you.

 

I have no debts, judgements, or other oustanding items.

I named my first born after me, some 27 years ago.

He moved out of my home in Sept this year.

 

I found a flyer in my letter box "REMOVAL 5pm TODAY" dated 20th Nov.

The bailiffs buzzed on my garden entrance intercom on 21st Nov.(3pm)

He said he had clamped my car and wanted £495ish or would remove it.

I told him that it was my car and I was not the person he was looking for.

He was rude, beligerant and somewhat threatening because he thought I was lying.

I called the police and after some time an officer turned up to stop any "breach of the peace"

The bailiff had no interest in my explanation of what the true circumstances were.

The officer entered my house, checked all my documentation and was wholly satisfied that I was indeed the owner of the vehicle, and that my son was indeed the debtor.

He relayed all those facts to the bailiff, and was perplexed at the bailiffs stance that he intended to leave my vehicle clamped. The officer felt that he had no power to act and suggested I ring the council, which I did. They saw that there indeed there could be an issue and I am led to believe they contacted Jacobs Bailiffs. After phone calls to and fro (me & council / me & Jacobs ) the bailiff left, leaving my car clamped and it was clamped for 24 hours before they came to release it. Because it was clamped in front of my garage, my wifes car was also unavailable.

 

I have processed a Form 4 complaint. Do you think I have a valid case.

 

There are two issues here. The wrongful clamping and the excessive and I believe illegal fees that they are attempting to charge my son. At this point I am only trying to deal with the clamping issue.

 

I have never been in debt in my life and they treat me like a common criminal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Any fees the bailiffs have added on levy clamping fee ect must be removed as the levy invalid as not the debtors property

 

I would also go for the council as it is there agents and they are responsible for there actions copy in your local MP

 

I would make the complaint about the bailiff they nothing more than a playground bully the way they think they have the upper hand until now!!

 

Bailiff must get this weeks Numpty award if the police told him it was not the debtors car

 

who were the bailiff company??

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bailiffs are Jacobs Certificated Bailiffs.

 

I have now spent hours and hours researching my rights and the actions that I am able to take, writing letters and making phone calls to my solicitor for advise. Is all this claimable?

The bailiffs said that they have called at my premises 3 times. It is a lie and both my wife and I will "testify" to that. The only paperwork that was seen was the flyer I mentioned. This whole affair has really got my back up.

Edited by lgwarren
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bailiffs are Jacobs Certificated Bailiffs.

 

:first: this is the award for the numpty bailiffs Jacobs!!!

 

I would take this all the way with both bailiffs and the council

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should approach the p;olice force and ask the attending officer for a statement, then file it as annexe to your form 4 complaint.

 

If the police decline your request, then get the CAD number for your 999 call you made, and quote it on the form 4 complaint statement, and the judge can requisition the officers notes for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have requested this and am waiting for him to contact me. He really was perplexed at the bailiffs attitude but unfortunately felt he was powerless.

I did complain to the council, but their reply suggested that the bailiff had acted correctly. I actually think they are confused between my son and me (initially understandable, but in the circumstances they should be more careful). I have wriiten again to clarify the facts of my case, the wrongful clamping and urged them to re consider MY complaint.

Edited by lgwarren
Link to post
Share on other sites

you will have to exhaust the council complaint procedure before taking it to the ombudsmen can be a long , slow process

 

It may be quicker to send the council a letter before action

then on the small claims court

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about complaining to CIVEA, but it looks like Mr Jacobs is the "Immediate Past Chairman" or something, so to me there would be little point.

I think their deliberations would be at best, one sided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

My concern here is the police officers actions as that police officer had full proof and agreed that the OP was in fact correct but continued to let the Baliff commit a Breach of the Peace and tresspass right in front of the OP and the Police Officer after the OP had fully proved their innocence. In a way the police were complicate in the actions of the baliff be letting then proceed to clamp that vehicle after it was proved the baliff was incorrect.

 

Its a sad day when the police stand back and let a baliff carry out illegal action against an innocent person when this has been proved to the police and they stand and watch the illegal actions and do nothing wonder what your Councillor and MP will think of that one.

 

As for the Baliffs heavy handed tactis breach of the peace, tresspass, depriving you of your own property, illegal clamping, distress, threats oh I could go on what an idiot report this fully that person has crossed the line.

 

Dont let this drop Formal Complaints in writing (always get proof of posting) to Police, Council and Baliff Company and send copies of your letters to your local councillor and mp.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complaints against police officers conduct are made intiially to the Inspector, but I wouldnt rattle the police just yet, the OP needs police cooperation by providing a statement to support a form 4 complaint.

 

Only start the police complaints procedure if the police start pising around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no reason to believe that the officer would be anything other than helpful. He was quite young and the law surrounding all this is it seems quite complex. I will give him time to get back to me. This week he is on nights, 10-7, so it may be difficult for him. He was in my corner while he was with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make the request in writing for a statement or a copy of his notebook. He will comply because if you show the judge at a form 4 hearing his refusal letter then the police officer himself is going to have a judge breathing down his neck.

 

A short polite letter is all that needed and addressed to the officer in person you want trhe statement from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should initially send a Formal Complaint to the head of parking at the council marked as such, indicating that the bailiff acted ultra vires, as you are a third party to the debt, copy it to the council CEO, the Elected Leader and your MP

You could state that you are considering a claim for tortious interference *(may wind them up a little if they think that their bailiff has messed up) with goods, as your vehicles were effectively illegally impounded for 24 hours, and point out that they are wholly liable for any wrongful action by their agent Jacobs, who should have checked with the DVLA before clamping. I wonder if this council and/or Jacobs are on the DVLA banned list?

 

Another incident that proves the police need training in bailiff law. that bailiff should have been carted off to the clink.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you TB Law.

 

To update you on my Form 4 complaint.

I received confirmation of its receipt from the court, and am led to believe that the bailiff has until tomorrow to respond. Would you know what happens next and what the time limits I have to give the court

a) the police officers notes and

b) anything else that I feel the court should know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need more time then you may have to ask the court to adjourn so you can take statements from the attending officers. I dont expect any decision will be made until new year, only the bailiff has to give his response to your complaint thus far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i ask the OP a question which you failed to say in the 1st post

 

is the debt commercial debt like CT or a PCN

or a magistrates court warrant for a non payment of a court fine

 

if its a magistrates matter, then if you show the police the documents you need to of proven to the bailiff the same, that is what a distress warrant wants him to do, assertain any assets or chattles belonging to the debtor

 

im not excusing his bad attitude, no need to be an ass

but u needed to prove to the bailiff as well as the police

 

if its not a magistrates matter then i would say he was a bigger jackass coz he hasnot got a warrant and therefore has less powers and was trying to just get one-up

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police officer who attended has to be given credit where due in checking who the registered owner/keeper of the vehicle was and telling the bailiff of this. He could have arrested the bailiff for Attempted Fraud by Misrepresentation, Being In Possession of An Article for Use in Connection with Fraud or, even, an offence of Attempted Blackmail. Pity he didn't because that would have been kudos for the police officer and a smack in the head for the civil enforcement industry.

 

If the bailiff cannot produce a valid Clamping Order, that is Unlawful Interference with Property and Unlawful Detention of Property, under Civil Law, as well as the potential criminal offences mentioned above.

 

In order to obtain a statement from the police officer or a copy of his Incident Report or pocketbook entry, you will need to apply to the Solicitor's Department of the police force concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i ask the OP a question which you failed to say in the 1st post

 

is the debt commercial debt like CT or a PCN

or a magistrates court warrant for a non payment of a court fine

 

if its a magistrates matter, then if you show the police the documents you need to of proven to the bailiff the same, that is what a distress warrant wants him to do, assertain any assets or chattles belonging to the debtor

 

im not excusing his bad attitude, no need to be an ass

but u needed to prove to the bailiff as well as the police

 

if its not a magistrates matter then i would say he was a bigger jackass coz he hasnot got a warrant and therefore has less powers and was trying to just get one-up

 

The bailiff requires a Clamping Order whatever. No Clamping Order, no clamp on vehicles belonging to either the debtor or third-parties. This bailiff hasn't just been an ass, he has been an idiot of the First Order as he has potentially put his bailiff certificate at risk of cancellation and consequent loss of employment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...