Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Long term sick/Withheld holiday pay/Voluntary Redundancy. Can I get them to pay my outstanding holiday pay separately?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4158 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

A newbie seeking advice here.

Background

I've been working for a public sector employer now for about 7.5 years. We are all too familiar with appalling management standards set by our employers and I was somehow expected to be a miracle worker with very little budget and disagreements between to sets of management teams about what key aims, responsibilities and targets for my post were I ran myself ragged until I succumbed to Chronic Fatigue in June 2010.

 

I was off for 5.5 months before returning to work on a phased return in Dec 2010 under Occupational Health but within a couple of months of my returning, my psychopathic manager piled on the workload, subjected me to harrassments of various types and I succumbed again in March 2011 this time with Stress and Depression.

 

Rather than following the Stress at Work protocols from Health & Safety exec, ensuing investigations proceeded instead took me to grievance which ultimately was not uphold (surprise). When I contested the fact the 'grievance' proceedure had not been followed, the biased 'appeal' which I recorded, revealed clear collusion between the Appeal Officer and HR!:-(

 

Anyway, I remained stressed and off for a further 8 months (although meeting management monthly). When I started to feel a little better, I instructed management that I wanted to take my accrued A/L entitlement before returning (41 days). I was told I would have to be signed 'fit for work' before I could take my annual leave but research suggested otherwise and that employees off sick can still take their a/l. I also sent management the legal standing regarding sickness and annual leave.

 

Discussions ensued where my employers did not address the legal information I provided, would not allow me to take the holidays but instead offered me partial payment of A/L (31 days) with me then having to use my remaining A/L entitlement (and whole of the following year's entitlement) to prop up my phased return when came back to work. (Although I probably should have taken it in hindsight) I felt this was disability discrimination and this caused a 'stalemate' in the proceedings.

 

Fast forward another 12 months, (which includes a pregnancy and miscarriage) and continued sick leave, my employers left me languishing without addressing any of the legalities and a couple of weeks ago started Capability Hearing proceedings (which is 'on hold' due to pregnancy loss).

Okay this is the point of major interest folks...

 

I was scoping the site for Personal Injury information for Stress at Work just last week, but there has now been a major announcement from my employers that they are cutting their workforce and are seeking candidates for Voluntary Severance btwn 6 Dec - 25 Jan 2013. It seems the best way to go now to cut my losses having been through a horrendous 3 years but I need to know the following:

  • Can I request my outstanding A/L 41 days from 2010/11 tax year? (I also have an email where they said they would pay me the entire 41 days by 31 March 2011 - but the did not)

 

  • Can I also request the accrued A/L from April 2012 (before I apply for the Voluntary Severance)

OR will they be within their rights to say that I cannot take any of the A/L if I'm planning on taking the Voluntary Severance as it might give me some 'unfair financial advantage'.

  • Do you think I can I negotiate this or will I not have a legal leg to stand on?

 

  • Might they even reject my application for Voluntary Severance and proceed with the Capability Hearing if I push this too far?

 

  • Also, if I've been off sick for the best part of 2 years, when they calculate the Voluntary Severance package (which last time was 3 weeks for every year) will they reduce or negate the last 2 years as I have not been at work?

I have read the ACAS info - yes, but am not with the Union as they shafted me (sided with management) over the earlier trouble so I can't really guage where I stand with all this.

 

Sorry its been a long, detailed post but I'm hoping I can get some advice on this!!:|

Thanks!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

Given that its Sunday as well as late,there are not many of our regular posters active,but you should get some responses tomorrow,so please be patient.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are entitled to your A/L so if you are currently working you can take it by giving the notice required in the EU working time directive. If you are not working and getting paid anyway it will be counted in your annual salary. If you do take the severence get them to add it to your payment in lieu of notice period. If you are/have not been paid then you are entitled to the money. With regard to the long term sickness, it depends on whether you have been paid during the absence as it should count but may be considered as deferred employment. ( a bit like unpaid leave of absence where you acrue no benefits but they let you return to your job on the terms you were on ). That would be unusual for illness but common for having a year off to go to college etc.

I reckon they will be glad to give you a couple of months pay on top of your severance as a final settlement for any outstanding claims you may have against them to ensure that it stays away from an ET.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that ericsbrother. I'm chipping away piece by piece.

 

They just agreed today to pay me the outstanding 41 days annual leave that they owed me over 2011/12 leave year (yes witheld for that long!) which I'm extremely relieved about! I will now ask about annual leave from the current leave year for 2012/13 as that has accrued since April 2012.

 

I was also wondering as I've been off for a long time (but the issues were complicated and court-case worthy but it has shattered me) whether they might deduct/not pay for that period of sickness when they calculate the Voluntary Redundancy package they offer me?

 

Does sick leave amount to incompleted years of service? Any thoughts would be useful. Thanks

Edited by geishagirl257
made some mistakes in original post
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...