Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bounced Cheque - Cause for Action for Damages? ** VICTORY IS MINE **


madpriest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3896 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

no.only bailiffs.

 

first - if an HCEO collection fails, you will have to pay the costs. HCEO could run to a couple of thousands.

 

 

 

second - collecting from a bank doesn't need heavies.

 

 

 

use bailiffs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

from my phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - the post did bot bring the judgement so I can't move yet although I was informed

over the phone by the court that judgement was given yesterday - we await the mailman.

 

I've done some more research and have decided to go the HCEO route rather than baliffs for

a number of reasons as follows:

 

Firstly, County Court Balliff is £100.

Those guys get paid whether they recover or not.

They give Santander 7 days notice of visit thus giving space for Santander

to apply for a stay of execution or a set-aside

 

Second - you are a little mistaken about costs of HCEO

The costs upfront are £60 for a fi fa.

The HCEO takes care of all the paperwork from hereon.

They give NO notice of intended visit - they will either get the money or remove property.

If the enforcement fails, (unlikely) my further outlay is £60 fixed fee for the visit

+ VAT so my total outlay at worst is £132 - I can live with that

 

The thing that finally persuaded me was NO notice of visit.

 

Also the idea of turning the weapons that the Banks use against themselves

seems full of irony

 

 

 

I'll keep you all informed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please heed this serious warning. I had direct experience of putting in the HCEO. I can tell you that the £60 deal is often presented but in the event that they don't manage to execute the warrant - then I can pretty well guarantee that they will come to you for wasted costs.

 

I have managed to knock them back on two ocassions because I took care to get it in writing that the £60 was my maximum exposure.

I know others who have been hit with their wasted costs.

 

Have an email exchange with them and tell them that you are thinking if using their services for a warrant against Santander. You understand that the maximum cost to you is £60 and that all other costs will be levied against the bank.

You need them to agree that this is correct.

 

Be careful of these people. Don't think that they are decent and trustworthy just because they are approved by the court. They aren't. They are hardnosed businesses and they are used to getting their own way and they aren't used to being frustrated.

 

But if you can do that, then yes an HCEO visit would be wonderful. If you were able to get the date - you get get round and take some pictures - and we'll make sure they are published.

 

Believe me - ye of little faith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The series on BBC1 "The Sheriffs are Coming" follows HCEO's on their jaunts and they certainly seem to get results with the enhanced authority on which they act.

 

The programme makes a big noise about how it only costs £60 to send them in.

 

If you're liable for further fees in the event of failure, that would be a huge blow and folk should obviously be wary to get agreement up front about HCEO's costs.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks slick132 for that.

 

The company in that BBC series are actually called "The Sheriffs Office" which is the trading name of

a company in Croydon.

 

Their terms of business say that apart from the £60 court fee, the only other thing is

if the execution is a wash-out they will write a report and you get charged another £60 for that + VAT

so exposure = £132

 

However there is small print in that if there is a set aside or some other things, then they can charge you for the work done.

 

So I'm emailing others to ensure that my max exposure is the max exposure and nothing else.

 

Watch the space

Link to post
Share on other sites

The TV prog makes it look so simple and so cheap, but if Bankfodder urges caution regarding fees, you'll do well to follow his advice.

 

I'll continue to watch with interest...........

 

:-D

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Postman hs arrived bringing with me the judgement from Northampton County Court

 

Its entitled "Judgement for Claimant (In default)"

and its form N30

 

However it says "To the defendent ... You have not replied .... You must pay ...."

 

 

There's no notice to me --- is this correct - all you get is a copy of a notice to the Defendent?

 

Ok so off we troll

 

p.S. Ignore the question above. I've looked it up. Thats all I get. A copy of the Judgement that was sent to the defendent

Edited by madpriest
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so i've had a response from one HCEO in my area as follows:

 

From reading your email you seem to have done your research and you are correct – the court fee is £60 on sealing the High Court Writ of Fieri Facias (Fi Fa) and we charge £50 plus VAT in the event that we cannot collect on your judgment. This is the total exposure to costs and fees that the Sequestrators and Parochial Church Council would be liable for.

 

 

Couldnt get much clearer than that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect.

 

Have fun

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Any news???

Link to post
Share on other sites

we are in waiting mode.

 

Judgment in default obtained. No acknowledgement -

 

Application in process for Writ of Fi Fa through HCEO

Fees paid etc.

 

My guess it will be 3 weeks.

 

I am ringing the court twice per week to see whether there is any

application for setaside - No Applications received and still no acknowledgment.

 

Usual Santander Cockup

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ta.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Dealing with this case is like walking through treacle.

 

Latest - we needed to get a combined certificate and writ of fi fa.

The HCOE took it over and sent it to the County Court Centre in Salford (although its named "Northampton")

and there it sat and sat and sat.

 

Finally the thing gets signed and sealed on 1st March and they said "It's in the post"

 

Not received - we phone every day.

 

At one time you could go down to your local county court and get it sorted straight away

but now we have to send them off to a central office.

 

So much for the governments localisation agenda !!

 

Anyway - watch this space. The HCEO are itching to get into Santander's head office !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very frustrating.

I've noticed recently that the County Court system - which was a pleasure to use, has now become very centralised and very under-resourced.

I even heard a recording recently which said that there was a three week backlog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest

 

My friendly HCEO (So nice to have them on MY side for a change) reports as follows:

 

They finally received back from the Central County Court the signed and Sealed N293A

(Combined Certificate of Judgemenet and Request for Writ of Fieri Facias).

 

Then (bless their hearts), they out one of their people on a train to London and

personally went to the High Court in the Strand to actually get the writ of Fieri Facias)

which they sent a copy of the me.

 

It is an innocuous looking piece of paper but powerful and loaded.

The words are delightful ....

 

"Elizabeth The Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of our other realms and territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

 

To **Name Of Officer** an Enforcement Officer authorised to enforce Writs of Execution issued from the High Court

 

etc etc etc

 

YOU ARE NOW COMMANDED to seize in execution the goods, chattels and other property of Santander UK plc authorised by law and raise therefrom the sums detailed in the schedule together with fees and charges to which you are entitled. And immediately after execution to pay the claimant the said sums and interest.

 

Witness The Right Hon, Christopher Stephen Grayling MP Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain.

 

Lovely Jubbly.

 

I am informed that the lads are going into their head office today or tomorrow

 

watch this space

Edited by ims21
Name removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any chance that you can email me a scan of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@surfer01 - Court documents are public domain unless I'm mistaken - however .... looks like a mod has already done it

 

@bankfodder - Can you PM me your email address and I'll scan them in today.

I should add that I don't really want to go public with this -- I have my personal reasons

but if there is a good reason why you could use the scans then fine

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've emailed you my address - although you have it already.

 

I won't use the scan in any way without asking you first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it. Thanks.

 

I expect that the bank will move to setaside the judgment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

 

High Court Enforcement Officers arrived today at the headquarters of Santander to

find a bunch of headless chickens.

 

They didn't know what the case was about.

 

Santander: We need 24 hours to sort it out

 

Sheriff: NO - Pay up or we seize goods. I have an order to seize goods.

 

Santander: OK - we can give you a cheque

 

Sheriff: No - it might bounce

 

Santander: OK we will make a BACS transfer

 

Sheriff: NO - you might cancel it. Only a CHAPS payment will do.

 

Santander: Ok we will sort it out.

 

Sheriff: The meter's running

 

Outcome -----VICTORY - the money was paid in full in addition to a further £1400 for HCEO costs.

 

Cost to us??? £60

 

Our damages received = £4700

Edited by madpriest
ITLE change
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...