Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equita Bailiffs - Can I pay council directly and get rid of them??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4166 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have an outstanding debt of £214 in unpaid Council Tax which I need to clear by January 1st. Carelessly forgot to reinstate a cancelled direct debit when I got made redundant earlier in the year - have not had any reminders and just overlooked it.

 

I had a letter today from Equita - they have put a Form 7 through the door relating to my car (owned outright and for personal use only as far as insurance is concerned although I am to all intents and purposes now self employed, just not earning anything yet and therefore claiming working tax credit at highest level).

 

I can pay the Council Tax debt in full, and offered to do so today but they said no I had to pay the Bailiff. There is also a charge for £73.50 in Bailiff Costs.

 

I stupidly called the Bailiff before looking online and she said something else about their being another much smaller debt that wasnt included on the form and that she would be calling back seperately about that as "that is the way its done". She told me that I had to pay in full or they would take the car.

 

I didnt commit to paying anything, but said that I would call back on Monday.

 

Having read some initial advice online I feel that the following is what I want to do:

 

- Pay the amount direct to the Council so that I know it's clear. Do they have to accept payment from me directly?

- If absolutely necessary pay the Bailiffs fees.

 

Where does this leave me though? Can they take my car still? If there is another smaller amount which the Council didnt mention to me will the Bailiffs come and do the same thing again, and just incurr me more costs? Should I ask my friend if I can keep my car in her garage? If so, how long for??

 

Any advice very gratefully received...

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is nowt to stop you paying the council

directly via YOUR internet banking site

 

details are on the reverse of the bill

 

or by their automated payment line?

 

either way they cannot refuse it.

 

as for the other 'debt'

 

you need to phone the council and ask:

 

You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

as for the bailiff fees

if he has only been ONCE its £24.50

 

and HE CANNOT use a 'paid' LO to gain his fees.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£73.50 bailiffs costs something not right

 

how many visits/times has the bailiff been to your property

 

costs should be 24.50 first visit with no levy

 

£18 second visit with no levy

 

then a levy fee b ut that cant be charged on the same time as a visit fee

 

Pay the council directly make a complaint about the made up bailiff fees to the council

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the Form 7 there should be a list of the charges they have applied not just a lump sum? I suspect the "other small charge" will be an Attending to Remove fee of approx £175, they are being economical with the truth. Was this the first and only visit you have had from the Bailiff?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had one visit only...this was the first letter yesterday. Nothing previously.

 

I agree with what you say but in your place I would find out definitely what was owing as confirmed by the Council. As the fees to date are so low I would - if you have the money - pay what is owing as confirmed with the Council + the fees they are claiming - £73-50 and make sure you get a receipt or print a receipt. You may do this in person by cash at the Council - if they refuse this method you politely ask for the name & position of the person as this will then form the basis of a complaint against the Council. You may also pay using online banking, Council website or automated phone line.

 

It does go against the grain doing it this way but it ends all Bailiff action. You may then set about finding about the fees and put them to strict proof of any "claimed" visits. Any payment you have made that is unlawful or overcharged is reclaimable and the Council are 100% responsible for this.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just called the council who have agreed to take payment which is great.

 

But the bailiff insists that I owe £73.50 even though she admits it was her first visit.

 

She said that other bailiffs may have called before.

.(I have only had one letter, from her, yesterday).

 

Does the fact that she noted my car reg mean that she can charge more for that first visit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she has admitted it is her first visit and she made a levy on your car then the only charge she may make is for the levy alone.

 

That is worked out at 24.5% of the first £100 owed plus 4% on the remainder and any part of a pound is rounded up to the next whole pound.

 

Therefore the only fees she can have charged is £24-50 + £4-56 = £29-06 rounded to the next £ = £30.

 

She can not add fees for "maybe" visits by others as if there were then they shoudl have left their own documentation.

 

If she tries to charge you any more than this ask her politely what Court her Certificate was issued at as you would be making a complaint about her overcharging.

 

Incidentally have you checked to see if she is indeed Certificated?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the bailiff has admitted that no previous visits have been made then the levy fee according to the statutory fee scale should be £29.06.

 

I would ssuggest sending a text to the bailiff to advise that you will only pay fees that have been legally incurred and that as confirmation has been given that this was a 1st visit the only fees that can be charged is £29.06 for the cost of levying upon the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and when I spoke to her, she said if I didnt pay the full amount of fees, she WOULD be coming to get my car...should I keep it in my friends garage?

 

http://certificatedbailiffs.justice.gov.uk/CertificatedBailiffs/

 

It may be a good idea to have it elsewhere temporarily.

 

If she asks then your great Aunt Nellie who was passing broke down and you've lent her your car but she has gone to the Isle of Skye for a 3 weeks.

 

Seriously though she is telling you porkies and knows she has cocked up as she was obviously hoping to charge an "Attendance Fee" to garner more fees.

 

She needs to provide more proof of her fees.

 

Tell her you will contemplate a Form 4 complaint should she overcharge you

- this is a complaint that can be made to the County Court that granted her Certificate and in cases of serious complaint, including overcharging,

can basically remove her from her employment.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent her this text;

 

Thank you for confirming that your visit and letter yesterday was the first to my address. As I explained I have had no previous letter to my address from any other bailiff.

 

According to statute, your fee for first visit and levy should be £29.06. I will settle this, along with the amount that I owe to the council of £241.05 as per your paperwork, on Monday.

 

If yu believe that you are entitled to charge me further fees kindly put this in writing, along with the name of the instructing court, so that I can check with them.

 

The council have informed me today that there is one other outstanding amount of £11.50 (ref number xxx) which I have settled with them. They have informed me that you were not entitled to charge for this amount in any case.

 

Thank you.

 

Is that ok?? She is certified! Thank again...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Immediate response from her reads:

 

You are correct that the amount of £11.50 is not to incur any fees and can be settled at that amount.

 

As a court certified bailiff I am fully trained on what we can and cant charge.

 

If you require a breakdown of said charges this must be requested from our head office in wrirting.

 

As advised our action is ongoing until the full balance including our costs, is settled.

 

The matter is now in our hands and as the council have advised you, all payments are to be made to Equita ltd.

 

Well, the Council informed me otherwise..should I tell her this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have paid what is owed to the Council to both outstanding amounts (£214 & £11.50) direct to them along with the £29.06 legitimate bailiff fees, then there is no debt outstanding and her 'levy' is dead in the making.

 

You can for peace of mind, tell her the debt was offered in full and accepted by xxxCouncil inclusive of legitimate fees, then confirm the same in writing to Equita advising them you therefore see the matter closed.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Immediate response from her reads:

 

You are correct that the amount of £11.50 is not to incur any fees and can be settled at that amount. As a court certified bailiff - she doesn't even realise this is wrong as she is a Certificated bailiff - I am fully trained on what we can and cant charge - in that case she should have known she can't claim for "visits that might have been". If you require a breakdown of said charges this must be requested from our head office in wrirting. As advised our action is ongoing until the full balance including our costs, is settled. The matter is now in our hands and as the council have advised you, all payments are to be made to Equita ltd.

Well, the Council informed me otherwise..should I tell her this?

 

I wonder if your Council outsources it admin functions to Capita only this time the usual stitch up has failed.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council, Capita and Equita are all connected. In that the Council own Capita and Capita employ Equita to collect their debts, hence...they all earn a lump. Never risk debt with council, they will usually say "it's out of our hands now, you must pay bailiff". This also makes government employment statistics look better, when the council (as in your case) allowed you to pay them direct. You have gotten off lightly, pay the £29 and well done!

I had a 4 yr old CT tax debt for £100 go to wrong address. Equita took over and in the space of 3 weeks talking to the brick wall of a council re resolution. Equita (at first visit, after initial letter, I too made the mistake of ringing them) blocked me in my driveway, police were on their side and it cost me £600 on the spot, to keep my car!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time that the Capquita stitch up was killed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys just needing an additional piece of advice from you. I had a visit a month ago from an Equita bailiff re some Council Tax arrears. I paid £120 straight away but was disputing the full amount and had requested in writing a breakdown. It has taken them until this week to get them to me.

 

This was based on ONE visit in which she levied my car...

 

 

Debt: £241.05

Statutory Visit Fees: £24.50

Levy Fees: £31.00

 

TOTAL: £296.55

 

Does that look right to you guys? I want to know if it's lawful before I pay the remainder...

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...