Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We need to see the actual document from the IAS where it is written - "The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." You can't just type it up yourself. At the hearing in July or August or whenever the judge will have two Witness Statements. One from Bank's director says you never made a second appeal. You say you did make a second appeal and the IAS concluded that payment was made. The judge will immediately twig that either you or the director is lying.  But who? Fail to show the documentation form the IAS and instead just produce something you've typed yourself will make it look like you just made up the appeal and you are lying and you will lose the case. Please let us see what the IAS adjudicator sent.
    • I used to have a retail outlet in London selling my husband's photography.  We also had a co-op with staff so they weren't directly employed by me, but I paid for the other overheads etc.  When my husband died, I carried on as usual for a while but then I became ill and moved quite far away so logistically was becoming very difficult.  I came to an arrangement (verbal) with one of the guys I trusted, that I would send him the images to print and sell as normal, and I wouldn't take any money, as a short term solution until I got back on my feet and worked out the best way to do things. He would pay all the  rent, insurance etc... Over a year later, not able to give things away for free anymore,  I drew up a contract as a wholesale agreement, so I would get everything printed and sent to him and I would invoice his for what he ordered. I noticed form the beginning that he wasn't ordering enough or frequently enough to be making any money, and was suspicious he was doing his own orders on the sly and ordering just enough from me to keep my happy.  I checked with my printer, which I've been with for 20 years, and he sad he wasn't getting orders for my images from anyone else. I emailed a few other printers to ask them to keep a look out for some images but I soon realised this would be impossible to police.  The only option really would be to buy a print from him and check the stamp on the back of it.  I finally managed to get hold of on the prints on sale, and sure enough, he did not order it through me.   In the contract he signed in 2022 it explicitly states that he must destroy all files I had previously sent him etc etc so e is in breach of that.  When I drew up the contract, I was careful to make sure it was legally binding, but before I let rip at him, I need to know where I stand.  The contract is here: PARTIES This WHOLESALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of 30th June, 2022, by and between ############################## The Supplier and the Client, collectively referred to as the "Parties," hereby agree to the following terms: TERMS AND CONDITIONS SALES OF GOODS The Supplier agrees to provide the following goods to the Client (“Goods”): Description of Goods ################################# Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b BOTH PARTIES AGREE: The Client purchases the Goods through the Supplier directly, and agrees to delete/destroy any previously held digital images (Goods) owned by the Supplier, and agrees not to use any such files for monetary gain, outside of this agreement, either directly or through a third party from immediate effect of this agreement. The Client purchases the other materials necessary for resale of the Goods independently of this agreement. The Client shall have exclusive rights for resale of Goods at ###########, and also with permission, as a retailer of the Goods elsewhere, provided that there is no conflict of interest between the Supplier and the Client. The Client is free to decide their own retail prices, for the Goods. The Supplier shall use #####  to provide the printed Goods on Fujifilm Crystal Archive paper, with Lustre finish, and will not use any other Printer unless #### cease to trade, without prior approval from the Client. The Supplier shall not impose restrictions on size or frequency of orders made by the Client. The prices provided by the Supplier shall not increase for a minimum of 3 years, unless the prices of the raw materials rise, in which case the client will be informed immediately. Any discounts/promotional prices of raw materials shall be passed on to the Client by the Supplier, and the invoice will show adjustments for this, as well as credit for return postage of any damaged goods. This agreement can be terminated by the Client without notice; the Supplier must give notice of no less than 90 days, unless the terms of the agreement are breached, in which case, the agreement can be terminated with immediate effect. PAYMENT Orders must be paid for upon receipt of invoice, via Bank transfer: ######### Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b DELIVERY AND INSPECTIONS All orders received by 12.00am (midnight) shall be processed by the Supplier the following working day and delivery of order shall arrive in accordance with the Royal Mail schedule, or DPD, should express delivery be requested. The Client shall be liable for the delivery charge which shall be added to the invoice. The Goods will be delivered to the address specified by the Client. The Client shall be provided with order tracking, and should any problems arise with the ordering system or the couriers (Royal Mail, DPD), the Client shall be informed without delay of any such issues. The Client will inspect the Goods and report any defects or damage to the Goods in transit as soon as possible upon receipt of Goods, and will retain damaged Goods for return to Supplier for refund/replacement. GENERAL PROVISIONS CONFIDENTIALITY The prices of the Goods and other information contained in this Agreement is confidential and will not be disclosed by either party unless with prior written consent of the other party. INDEMNIFICATION The Client indemnifies the Supplier from any claims, liabilities, and expenses made by any third party vendors or customers of the Client. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with UK Law. ACCEPTANCE Both parties understand and accept the wholesale arrangement stipulated under this Agreement. Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Wholesale Agreement as of the day and year set forth above.   Signed by us both electronically.   I haven't broached any of this yet, and I am looking for some advice about what action to take.  The main issue I've got is that he has still go those images.  If I terminate the contract, I will need to know that he no longer has those images and I can't think of a bulletproof way to do this. I'm thinking I might tell him I will continue with the contract but ask for a  sum in damages and say that if I find out he's still doing it down the line I will terminate the contract and sue him for damages. The damages side of things I'm not sure how it would work as he is self employed, and I'm positive he doesn't declare all of his earnings to HMRC, in order to find out how much I have lost, would the court demand to go through his tax self assessments?  I'm not sure how to proceed with this, I don't want to lose that place as an outlet as it is in a prime spot in London, which is why I let him have those images in the first place as I would have had to pull out altogether at that point.  I am regretting it somewhat now though.  Please help.
    • I cannot locate anything in my paper work that states 2 payments were made? Perhaps you could point this out? In reply from IAS it states "The ticketing data has been attached" nothing was sent to me. I made a response to the IAS all this was done online
    • Thanks again for your responses. The concern I have here, is that freeholder of the land (a company, who presumably would have been the ones to have initially instructed PPM to manage the parking here), will have proof of exactly how long the vehicle was on site for, as the driver was meeting operatives from that company on a separate matter. On this basis, if the matter was to get to court, I feel all the other technicalities about signage, size of signage/font, lack of start/finish times, will not be enough to have any case dropped? This PCN was brought up to the freeholder but they have advised that PPM will not waive this charge. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HBOS [Nelson Guest Solicitors] received claim forms


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

POC

 

1.The claim is xxxx being monies owing to the claimant in respect of a credit agreement between HBOS and the defendant under account xxxxxxxxxxxx.

2.The agreement was terminated as the defendant failed to maintain the the agreed terms .In accordance with the pre-action protocols the claimant has attempted to contact the defendant and agree a repayment plan . the defendant has failed to respond or maintain a suitable arrangement and the balance remains owing .

 

3.The claimant claims interest pursuant of section 69 of the county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from xxxx to xxxxx totalling 0.94 and thereafter at a daily rate to date of judgemnt.

 

 

 

DEFENCE: (Edit to suit)

 

1. Paragraph 1 is admitted with regards to the Defendant entering in to an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim ('the Agreement') with XXXXXXXXX Limited.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is neither admitted or denied with regards to the Defendant defaulting on payments and the Claimant is put to strict proof to evidence this breach.

 

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

The claimant is also put to strict proof:-

 

(i) Disclose the agreement that this claim is based on.

(ii) Disclose a valid Default Notice/Termination Notice with proof of service.

 

4.On receipt of this claim I requested documentation by way of a CPR 31.14 request dated xxxxxxx namely the " Agreement" referred to in the claimants Particulars of Claim. The Claimant has yet to comply with this request.

 

5. Further, by reason of the fact that the Claimant is in default of a section 78 request dated xxth xxxxx xxxx, the Claimant has yet to comply with this request and until such time the Agreement cannot be enforced against the Defendant without an order of the Court, until such time they comply with my request.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Defence updated.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,quick update,i recd letter friday stating ccj isued and a final chance to aviod ccj???? well i also recieved a letter from the courts stating they have forwarded my defence to claimant and are waiting for a response, and just checked online and a ccj has not been issued still showing defence submitted do i need to respond to this? thanks for any advice , jitteryjayne.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for the reply, i am slightly confused, when you say they have issued a claim , i thought thats what i had already recieved and responded to by submitting my defence online. my defence was submitted 10/12 letter from wetcothes stating ccj registered dated11/12. letter from court recd 13/12/12 stating court have recieved my defence and sent it to claimant. so not sure how they can say ccj registered before a hearing date? your help is appreciated , jittery jayne

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see, you post was a little confusing, my guess is they are jus confirming the action taken, the ''avoiding CCJ'' may mean taking the case to mediation.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just a last ditch attempt to unsettle you JJ...you have submitted a defence their move next ...at a price they have to pay to issue an AQ...so far cheaper to get you to withdraw your defence and let them have judgment with no cost or work involved.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan up the letter

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates. {DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN]

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites [http://docupub.com/pdfconvert/]

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

happy New Year to everyone, hope everyone had a great time. (late i know but been a bit busy and ill over the christmas period)

 

i thought i'd update you ,

 

yes the previous letter made out i had been given a ccj but phoned the court who said they applied for it but it was rejected,

 

they have now sent me the Allocation questionaire to complete. (fair enough)

 

now very unsure what to do as i have had my reply to my SAR today and there is the application form i completed in the late 90's ,

is this now classed as the agreement .

 

if it is i have little left to base my defence on as previosly wescot stated that no cca would be forthcoming!!

 

should there be a copy of the default notice as there are no copies of any .

 

also on the statements shows over £500 in late charges , (£25.00 a time)

if i go for mediation can i aske them to knock off the amount i would reclaim for these charges

and ask for a payment plan for the balance,

 

and if i did would this avoid the ccj or would i have to ask for a tomlin order

( i was all for defending in court but it seems i missed the boat on unenforcability as reading on here i cant see any recent success defending against no original agreement, am i wrong?)

thanks for all your help

jj

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some intricacies involved in consumer credit agreements, things like are the prescribed terms correct (if they are there at all), are the cancellation rights on the agreement, does the interest rate match with the what is quoted on the agreement.....however not many people will be 100% confident to advise on this unless they are a qualified solicitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi please help

 

i recd my signed application form in my SAR to OC,

 

wescot said they didnt have CCA,

 

( my scanner has broken)

 

am totally confused what to do next,

 

i have recd the allocation questionaire and am now thinking of accepting mediation as

 

i have read somewhere that the application form can be accepted as the CCA,

if i go for mediation and i agree to pay does this avoid the CCj being issued,

 

i have to return my AQ tomorrow it has to be there monday and am totally at a loss what to put

 

. any help appreciated jj

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 37 already refers to your questions

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi quick update , I sent my aq back and stated I would go for mediation ( I decided to do this after I recd my sar back showing oc did have my signed application form ) now recd N24 from local court and this has confused me again ? It states

Claim stayed for one month

And gives me one week for the following steps to be taken

Either

The claimant must notify if the case has been settled

Or

The claimant/ defendant must write to the court requesting an extension of the stay period explaining steps taken towards settlement and identifying any mediator expert or other person helping with the case .thevletter should confirm agreement with all parties

Or

All the parties must file an allocation questionnaire at the court. Where a settlement of some of the issues have been reached a list should be attached to the completed questionnaire the list must be agrees by with other partie .

 

 

So do I have to forward another aq , Northampton told me they recieved it and the case was transferred to local court ? Do I have to find my own mediator ? I thought the court offered this service free , do I just await contact ? Is this just standard reply from local county court ??? Sorry if I'm being stupid but I can't work out what to do ? Any help appreciated , jj

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JJ

 

You can use the Courts appointed Mediator (ADR) or make approach yourself within the 1 month to try to narrow the differences between parties.Failing mediation within the 28 days a further AQ must be submitted.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Will the courts mediator contact me themselves? Or do I have to contact them ? And if so do I have to do this before Thursday and let the court know?

Or If I contact wescot myself is there a template letter I could use offering a settlement in monthly payments , less the amount I discovered in charges , any idea how much to offer , claim for just over £2000 they once offer me reduced figure of £ 1400. And if I do this do I inform the court of my actions ?

Thanks for all you help Andy much appreciated , jj

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Will the courts mediator contact me themselves? Varies you ring them Or do I have to contact them ? And if so do I have to do this before Thursday and let the court know? Why what's relevant about Thursday?

Or If I contact wescot myself is there a template letter I could use offering a settlement in monthly payments , less the amount I discovered in charges , any idea how much to offer , claim for just over £2000 they once offer me reduced figure of £ 1400. If they have previously offered £400.00 try £1000 And if I do this do I inform the court of my actions ? If settlement can be reached the claimant usually informs the court

Thanks for all you help Andy much appreciated , jj

 

I usually advise a phone call rather than letter in the initial stages ask to speak to the litigator connected with your claim.Phone calls catch them on the hop with not time to prepare and its not in writing until they respond.Perhaps throw in that you would be prepared to consider a Consent Order or Tomlin Order with view to avoiding any further costs.

 

Test the water ....you will then get a feel if its achievable or you are waisting your time.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim is stayed anyway until 7th March so mediate...not seeing the N24 verbatim I am not aware what they wish you to do by 21/02.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...