Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It would help us to advise you if you fill in the sticky that dx100uk posted yesterday, then we can start looking at this. It's also worth sending off an SAR [click on the letters for further information] to Met, so that you have all the information for later. You don't want to be trying to get hold of it in a rush. HB
    • I chose to transfer my Isa and went through the usual process, giving Shawbrook three weeks' notice, but it did not process the transfer until after my account matured.View the full article
    • so I need to return the questionaire   Do I go for the remediation fre eoption or straight to court?   is there a guide to filling this out or do i just go with what i think? (ie. judege, get all papers, make a decision)  
    • Thanks for replies people, I think i will hold tight for a bit.
    • Can I please have advice on how to deal with Forecourt Eye.  Received a letter claiming I drove off without paying for petrol three months ago...there is a picture of me at the pump and me clearly offering my card to pay - apparently I only paid for some snacks and then left. Its also for a very odd amount 23 - I did check my account and I was charged 1.50 for snacks. I obviously had every intention of paying and for some reason either the transaction didn't go through.    I am kind of fuming about this as I had no idea and if I did not pay I have no idea what the circumstances were , but not a 'drive off' as described by Forecourt Eye. I have no issue paying for the petrol if the payment for whatever reason did not go through. In fact we visited the garage on advice of a friend who has a legal background and offered to pay, the lady behind the till called the manager and we spoke to her on the phone where she robotically said its 'the way it is now and it goes to Forecourt Eye' I then said I am contractually obliged to pay you, not Forecourt Eye.  We are visiting the garage again when the manager is there and will offer to pay again.  Interestingly when we called in the lady behind the till asked if I had called the garage the day before about the matter- I said no that was not me, so somebody else clearly  has had the same issue, I can't see drive off's being that common in any petrol station! So I know I am not the only one.    I know calling Forecourt Eye is not advised, I visited a shell garage yesterday ( really not wanting to ) made sure I had chip and pin and made sure I knew exactly what was being entered into the machine. They now have their threatening posters all over the pumps, basically making them or the garage responsible for any mistake...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

On ESA for more than 13 weeks - did the law change?


Nystagmite
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I can't find this anywhere:

 

Someone I know claims that if you're a part time student, you're exempt from the ESA medical. That can't be right, can it? I've looked through various websites which state the conditions for the exemption from the ESA medical and there's no mention of being a part time student.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Treated as having limited capability for work

 

No-one is exempt from the medical assessment for ESA. All claimants have to undergo at least one element of it. But there are a few circumstances where a person can be treated as having limited capability for work. They are where the person is :

  • terminally ill
  • receiving chemotherapy (unless it is via oral medication)
  • under notice as a carrier of, or had contact with, an infectious disease
  • pregnant and there would be a serious risk to health of the claimant or her baby if she did not refrain from work
  • pregnant, entitled to Maternity Allowance and within the Maternity Allowance period
  • pregnant or have recently given birth, not entitled to Statutory Maternity Pay or Maternity Allowance, from 6 weeks before the birth to 2 weeks after baby is born
  • a hospital inpatient
  • receiving treatment by way of haemodialysis, plasmapheresis, radiotherapy or total parenteral nutrition, in any week when the person receives treatment or has a day of recovery from treatment. In the first week of any such treatment, claimant is only treated as having limited capability for work if they have:
    • 2 days of treatment; or
    • 2 days of recovery; or
    • 1 day of treatment and one day of recovery
    • The days do not have to be consecutive

I don't deal with his aspect in my job at the JCP but found this bit of information and it states who will be classed as having a limited capability but there are no exemptions from the ESA medical sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Like many, I've been on ESA for more than 13 weeks. 17 to be precise. I remember that they were saying about how those of us waiting longer than 13 weeks would (or should?) get the WRAG component until we're assessed and it's decided which group we're in.

 

Did this ever go through as law? Or was it something they were thinking about doing; but hasn't actually gone through yet?

 

Really fed up now - can't live on this amount (£56.25 per week) for much longer. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Nystagmite:

 

Case law changed but Work n Pensions put in a late application for the full statement of reasons. Don't think we know whether they've appealed to the upper tier.

 

There's a thread about it on Rightsnet;

 

'Employment n Support Allowance - Payment of Work Related Activity Component'

 

Regards, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Like many, I've been on ESA for more than 13 weeks. 17 to be precise. I remember that they were saying about how those of us waiting longer than 13 weeks would (or should?) get the WRAG component until we're assessed and it's decided which group we're in...

 

That would be nice, I'd be able to retire to warmer climes on the backdated payments! So far, this time round, I'm a day or two shy of week 48 of the assessment rate and not a sniff of an ESA50. To be fair, I gave up chasing it in July.

I do understand your despair, Nystagmite. It's only the advent of DLA that has made life financially bearable. And my assessment rate is a shade under £15pw more than yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to read the whole thread even to begin to under stand it All !

 

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/2810/

 

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/2810/P15/#11894

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

:mmph: :Bad News: :mmph:

 

In a not entirely unexpected turn of events;

 

Work n Pensions have appealed the first tier tribunal decisions.

 

Unfortunately, until the issue is decided by an upper tier tribunal, the work related activity component of employment n support allowance won't be paid pending the completion of a work capability assessment.

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do i read about the tribunal decision and the subsequent leave to appeal to upper tribunal. I had a look but frankly its a bit gobbledegook and hit 'n' miss when i look at that lol.

 

From all i can see is:

 

Employment and Support Allowance

 

JR/2638/2010 & JR/2639/2012

Whether the duty under section 20 of the Equality Act 2010 can be enforced by judicial review. Whether the Department for Work and Pensions is in breach of its duty to make adjustments in respect of those with mental health problems when undertaking the preliminary stages of a work capability assessment.

 

and in sure thats about the getting doctors reports prior to an assessment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Zonker:

 

Think you may be confusing two separate employment n support allowance cases currently meandering at snail pace through our legal system. For the moment neither can be accessed through the usual channels cos they're both sub judice.

 

Three appellants in East Anglia are arguing that claimants shouldn't be penalised for Atos' inability to complete work capability assessments within thirteen weeks. The Rightnet thread mentioned in #2 and #4 discusses differing interpretations of the regs.

 

Down in London two claimants who've mental health issues have, with help from a legal charity, forced a judicial review of whether the work capability assessment breaches equality legislation. Both Disabled People Against Cuts and the Disability News Service have articles on their websites.

 

Regards, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I knew that there was a legal challenge with regards to mental health, thats the one i could find on the tribunals website in the upcoming section.

 

I cant find anything about leave to appeal or tribunal decisions on any of the 3 cases where esa is deemed to be paid at wrag rate from 13th week when they havnt been assessed by atos. Im sure there has to be something somewhere..i mean to say DWP were out of time and needed to ask for permission, thats got to be recorded somewhere?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Zonker:

 

www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/tribunal-decisions

 

The decisions database on theTribunals Judiciary website doesn't list first tier decisions for social security and child support cases. Assuming there's no further appeal, after about six months the decisions together with full statements of reasons are loaded onto law databases and the paper records are destroyed. So far as I know the databases are only accessible via subscription.

 

Seem to remember that 'parties to the proceedings' can view the paperwork but I doubt it'd be accessible to anyone else. :hand:

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

Asked GP receptionist if I need to see GP for a new fit note. She looked on her computer and asked if it was for ESA and said that they have been in contact; but they (surgery) haven't heard anything since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Zonker:

 

Not really cos, unless a judge can be persuaded otherwise, the timescale for further appeal (inclusive of a month to request the full statement of reasons) is about three months after the first tier tribunal decision.

 

Think it's more along the lines of;

 

If no-one's asked about this for six months we're safe to chuck the paperwork. :-)

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...