Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help with Robinson Way Limited


PWoods
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please could you advise me and help me through this problem with Robinson Way Limited?

 

I have just received a letter named and addressed to me,

saying that they are chasing a debt owed to 'equidebt - ex nationwide. It is for quite a lot of money.

 

The fact is I have never heard of this debt, nor have i ever taken out or bought anything from Nationwide or equidebt for this amount.

 

No default even shows up on my credit report or history, as i have just bought a new house (we've only lived here 12 months)

and my credit history was very good, throughout the house buying process, with no debtsoutstanding.

 

They are threatening to advise their client to take me to court.

 

I have never heard of any of these people.

 

After looking at the support and advice of others in this group, I have sent the template letter to them,

stating that i know nothing about the debt owed and to send me written evidence.

 

Is that ok to start with or do i need to do anything else?

 

Who are these people and who are equidebt?

 

Will they be able to black list my property and involve my wife?

 

Will this damage hers or my credit history, even though i have now sent them a letter disputing their claim?

 

I would really appreciate any words of advice or wisdom.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please could you advise me and help me through this problem with Robinson Way Limited? I have just received a letter named and addressed to me, saying that they are chasing a debt owed to 'equidebt - ex nationwide. It is for quite a lot of money.

 

The fact is I have never heard of this debt, nor have i ever taken out or bought anything from Nationwide or equidebt for this amount. No default even shows up on my credit report or history, as i have just bought a new house (we've only lived here 12 months) and my credit history was very good, throughout the house buying process, with no debtsoutstanding.

 

They are threatening to advise their client to take me to court. I have never heard of any of these people. After looking at the support and advice of others in this group, I have sent the template letter to them, stating that i know nothing about the debt owed and to send me written evidence.

 

Is that ok to start with or do i need to do anything else? Who are these people and who are equidebt? Will they be able to black list my property and involve my wife? Will this damage hers or my credit history, even though i have now sent them a letter disputing their claim?

 

I would really appreciate any words of advice or wisdom.

 

Thank you

Hi welcome to CAG,

 

I suggest that you write to the Compliance Manager at RW send this by recorded delivery.

 

ref: as on their letter.

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I refer to your letter dated xx xx xxxx in which you allege that I owe a debt for £xxxxxx to Equidebt for an account with Natationwide, please take note I do not acknowledge any debt to Robinson Way, Equidebt or Nationwide,.

 

I have not been contacted by any of the parties you mention in your letter at any time.

 

Having checked my personal credit history I have concluded that any such alleged debt is now statute barred therefore I will not now or at any time in the future make any payment or offer of payment in regard to the allged debt.

 

Please note I am fully aware of the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2011 and the sections regarding the pursuit of statute barred debt.

 

You will now cease to process and store all data relating to me with immdeiate effect.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RD this and see what crawls out of the woodwork.

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have a Nationwide account, but I stopped using it ten or twelve years ago, when I moved house. I'm not sure I closed it officially, but it hasn't been used for at least 10 years and it was empty when I left, transferring all of the Direct debits etc. I don't have any of the paperwork now. Would have thrown it out after about 6 years!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1. Is that ok to start with or do i need to do anything else?

2. Who are these people and who are equidebt?

3. Will they be able to black list my property and involve my wife?

4. Will this damage hers or my credit history, even though i have now sent them a letter disputing their claim?

 

I would really appreciate any words of advice or wisdom.

 

Thank you

Hold the horses here a bit. Let's take this one step at a time.

 

1. Your response was exactly the right one, as stated by Havinastella. They should cease all collection activity while they process your request. If they do not, raise an official complaint with them.

2. They are a debt collection agency. DCA. Main stream creditors do not like to get their hands dirty with defaulted debts. So they pass these debts on to DCAs, either using them as an agent or selling the debts via assignment. A DCA acting as an agent has no legal powers at all.

3. This is a way off yet. But, if the debt is yours (it isn't) then they can legally report the status of the debt to your credit file. There is no such thing as blacklisting. However, if (and only if) your wife has a joint account with you she might find it harder to get credit.

4. As above. If they falsely mark your credit file with a default, this can be removed.

 

You should check your credit file from time to time. DCAs can be cavalier about registering defaults so you should check to make sure they haven't.

 

Noddle is based on the smaller of the three agencies (Callcredit) but you get online access for free and for life (the other 2 cost £15 a month after the first month).

Noddle

ICO - credit reference agencies

You can get paper copies for £2 each, per agency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is quite simple if this account was closed 12 years ago and no payment or acknoeledgment in writting has been made in that time the debt became statute barred after 6 years anyway so they cannot damage any thing now.

 

RW have been taking on a large amount of old debt, but of course they are not made aware of just how old the debt is or it's status in regard to the Limitation Act 1980.

 

I'll amend the letter for you to send.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your fine with your wifes account it would only affect both if it was a joint account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

plus its a DCA chasing a debt for a DCA no the OC mationwide

 

where in all the concorted rights of assignment that sits as to even IF

any DCA can do anything to you is very debateable

 

sounds like they are just phishing to see if they can find a mug who knows no better to spoof into paying.

 

either that or its a case of fraud.

 

if you did default on the account, its long dropped off your cra file [the defaults 6th birthday]

 

you'll prob find Robbersway have no paperwork at all [DCADCA they never do]

and when they do get it

it'll be just bank statements [as there is no CCA on bank accounts]

 

they either see its so old and drop it like a hot stone

or

they'll magic up some phatom payment in 2007 to claim its not SB'd

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi, returned with news...Robinson way sent a letter back, saying they were letting go of my so called 'case' and passing it on (or back.) That was in October.

 

Now I've just had a letter from Mackenzie Hall for the same amount!

 

Never heard from them before.

 

I'm sending them the letter I sent Robinson Way.

 

Really annoying.

 

When will this all go away?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes same letter but add that RW has ''given up'' on the account very recently.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO its time to stop the letter tennis

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...