Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok, here we go:

 

Unfortunately I had to take my previous employer to the Employment Tribunal. They spent over 20k just on a solicitor and I have to admit he was really good so I had no chance to win. They tried to claim that money from me but thanks God the judge decided as follows:

 

"The Claimant is ordered to pay £150 to the Respondent towards the Respondent's costs."

 

"In setting the amount I have taken into account what the Claimant tells me about her financial situation at the moment. That said she is, through the help of her husband, managing to cover rent and living expenses and in my view would be at least be able to pay the above sum in a reasonable period in instalments of, for example, £15 per month as soon as she does have an income"

 

The document was issued on 03/08/12 and sent to me on 07/08/12.

 

I am in a seriously difficult financial situation and simply didnt treat it as urgent as other costs like rent, food etc.

 

Few days ago a bailiff knocked to my door and showed me Attendance To Remove for £1126.43 !!!!

 

I did NOT let him enter my property and said I have to contact my legal aid for help. He said will come back within 7 days and the charges/fees will be higher.

 

On my request he showed me a copy of Writ of Fi Fa. From that document I see that my ex employer raised the case in County Court on the very same day as the ET cost order issued - 03/08/12. On that date I didnt even know that the cost order exist!

 

If Im not wrong the ET Judge decission gives me about 10 months for repayment.

My financial situation hasnt changed within 1 day!

Is it ok that their started the whole process so soon?

 

Obviously I was not informed about any of these steps taken against me. No even a single letter was sent to me.

 

I live with my husband and our situation is getting very very bad. We can barely pay off our monthly instalments for other debts which is £600 a month all together. That writ of fi fa is simply killing us now.

My ex-employer is a multimillionaire company and I dont believe it makes them any difference if I pay now or later. They just want a revenge.

 

I am happy to pay that £150 straight away and finish the whole case asap.

 

I want to apply for 'stay of execution' and set aside. I have n244 and ex160 forms ready to be send. Just need someone to help me write a statement/explanation to the court. My english isnt that good so please I beg for help.

Edited by slavka
Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

or

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

.

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates. {DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN]

.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I assume that you have not paid anything towards this yet? I assume this as I note the Writ was sealed on 20 September.

 

As far as the Writ is concerned I wouldn't worry unduly because as long as you deny them access to your home or otherwise prevent them levying on goods outside then the HCEO is really powerless. If you have a car parked outside then you must move it immediately as they will remove it on sight. Although the HCEO must make peaceful entry to your home he may force entry to any detached buildings on your property - garage, outhouse, shed, greenhouse etc if he believes there are goods inside that may help satisfy the debt.

 

Whilst I agree you may need to apply for a Stay of Execution against the HCEO I don't understand what you need to Set Aside. Part of the difficulty you have is that a Judgment was made at an ET for you to pay what apears to be minimal costs but as nothing has been paid to date the other side are looking for payment. Therefore I think your application for the Stay may fail & your other course of action may have been to apply for a Variation in payment but think this may fail also as you already have a reasonably low figure already set.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I know that it is late but am I missing something here??

 

A couple of years ago the government made changes that allowed a "fast track" process of RECOVERING EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL AWARDS by allowing the AWARDS to be enforced by way of a High Court Enforcement Officer.

 

In your case, you have NOT been AWARDED any money at all. Instead, you have been ordered to pay COSTS of £150. I am therefore at a loss to understand the legal basis for this debt to be able to be enforced by way of the High Court. The normal limit would be for the debt to be £600 or more.

 

I would strongly suggest that you contact the employment tribunal office in the morning to make enquiries.

 

PS: Which High Court Enforcement company is involved?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope I dont get banned for mentioning a company name.... it is NEWLYN High Court Enforcement Limited.

 

By saying set aside I ment that I want to pay that 150 without any funny charges - im sorry the whole thing really confuses me. I spoke with advisors from 'busines debtline', HCEO Association, CAB and no one can help me. Everyone says it's a strange case and I need to seek a legal advice from a solicitor.

I wish I could do that but cannot afford to pay £120 per hour

Edited by slavka
Link to post
Share on other sites

How on earth did the ex employer inflate the £150 to above £600 to get the writ of fi-fa, perhaps he handed it straight to Newlyn which then frontloaded it's fees to get the debt over the "magic" £600, and went for the writ I would be as per tomtubby asking the ET office some serious questions today.

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That order is very clear, you would be expected to make payment at the rate seen to be affordable to you (£15pcm) ONCE you have employment.

 

There was no provision made within the order for interest to be added so they cannot charge that.

 

As TT has said there is provision for the use of High Court Enforcement to recover any AWARD, however in your case there was no AWARD made by the tribunal and other than small costs repayment ONCE you are in employment there is nothing to permit the involvement of HCEO and the debt of £150

has been seriously inflated to permit it be transferred to a Writ of Fi' Fa'.

 

You need to speak with the Tribunal office first thing this morning, if they drag their heels come back here and I will help you with the wording to a Stay of Execution.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

How on earth did the ex employer inflate the £150 to above £600 to get the writ of fi-fa, perhaps he handed it straight to Newlyn which then frontloaded it's fees to get the debt over the "magic" £600, and went for the writ I would be as per tomtubby asking the ET office some serious questions today.

 

Unfortunately with ET cases the sum owing can be as small as 1p & can then be handed over for HCEO involvement. However it is more aimed at the employer who refuses to cough and this case appears to highlight an abuse of the system.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately with ET cases the sum owing can be as small as 1p & can then be handed over for HCEO involvement. However it is more aimed at the employer who refuses to cough and this case appears to highlight an abuse of the system.

Thanks for that PT, you have confirmed my fears, as it appears totally disproportionate in this case, advice as per above contact Tribunals office to ask WTF is going on.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called ET twice today and on both occassions have been told they cannot answer any of my questions and I need to speak with a High Court so thats what I did.

Same answer from High Court! They cannot advice or comment and I need to speak with a legal aid. WTF is wrong with this system???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry not to have replied sooner but I have been tied up this evening....I will get back to you tomorrow to help with the N244...I need a bigger picture to put you a statement together so I have sent you a PM as it is better to keep replies to some of the questions I need answers to ...behind closed doors.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

CHECK THIS OUT!

 

Im not sure if this is over now. I emailed claimant and asked for their account details to make a payment - havent received any reply yet.

Is it possible they want to appeal?

 

wonkeydonkey - thank you so much for your help, I wouldnt make it without your help!

BIG THANKS to everyone!

Edited by slavka
Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

well done

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done ....but to give the forum an update to the actions I advised the cagger to take and the reason for doing so....

 

The Tribunal had awarded the claimant a small amount (£150) to their bill of costs,(20k) it was clearly outlined the defendant would be expected to make payments to this at £15pcm WHEN in the position to have an independent income(a job) that permitted payments to commence.

 

That the claimant took no steps to enquire if the defendant was positioned to commence with a repayment plan but took to enforce with the aid of HCE.

 

I advised an application to a stay of execution and set aside of the Writ on the grounds the claimant had created fees that were disproportionate to the amount owed. .....it would appear the Court agreed!!!

 

Well done slavka you were a dream to work with, it is always hard to put your trust in a total stranger but you did and for that I say a big THANK YOU.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, all I can say is well done WD!!:thumb:

When an employer is prepared to spend 20k at an employment tribunal there's something wrong.

When they pull a fast one and push it up to HCE there's definitely something wrong.

Again well done and perhaps a re-examination of the original dispute might be worth a look??

Illegitimi non carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent result WD, all my hats off to you :whoo: yes something amiss here when £150 can become thousands due to a rapacious ex-employer and a HCEO

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, all I can say is well done WD!!:thumb:

When an employer is prepared to spend 20k at an employment tribunal there's something wrong.

When they pull a fast one and push it up to HCE there's definitely something wrong.

Again well done and perhaps a re-examination of the original dispute might be worth a look??

 

Having now seen all the documentation appertaining to the OP's claim ...I am stunned to read the appeal failed, the evidence to unfair dismissal is so strong and with the right representation this case should be appealed. That of course is easy to say but, the trauma of having gone into the tribunal and having stood alone could understandably leave the OP content to put the matter aside.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...