Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC Parking charge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Would like some advice please.

on 16th August this year I parked in Lidl to get a small amount of shopping. Its free to park here and has always been. On this particular day, I parked my little 'smart car' not in a parking bay as it was busy, I parked it alongside a parking bay where there are no parking bay lines, not in anyones way at all. I was in the shop 6 minutes, and when I returned I had a 'ticket' on my windscreen from UKPC saying that I had parked incorrectly and was to pay either £90 or if I pay within 14 days it would be £45 !! This company must have only just taken over the car park as they have never been there before.

The 'ticket' stated 'Issue time 13.17pm, Time first seen 13.17pm. The receipt I got from Lidl's for my shopping was timed at 13.23pm. I am fuming that I am supposed to pay a parking charge at best of £45 for doing my shopping as I have always done which now the car park has now been infested with UKPC.

When I got home I immediately emailed them to appeal the charge and they sent me a generated reply stating they would reply withing 21 days.

This morning ( 26th September) I received a reply from their 'Appeals dept' saying the parking charge was 'correctly issued' and I have 14 days to pay the 'reduced' charge of £45.

Now, do I send these toe rags my hard earned £45, or do I just ignore them and wait for them to go away?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alternatively, contact (email) Lidl's head office, explain the circumstances (enclosing a copy of your receipt) and demand that they either cancel the PCN or make arrangements for you to return your shopping for a full refund.

 

Unless these huge companies are made aware of this sort of ridiculous and unethical behaviour being perpetrated in their name then nothing will change.

 

(EDIT since Lidls have started taking debit cards then it's also possible that your bank statements might evidence that you are a fairly regular Lidl's customer?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for your advice. I still have the till receipt for the shopping I purchased when I got that ****e 'charge notice'. I will not be paying the £45 or any other amount they ask me for. I have just written a snotty letter to UKPC telling them exactly what I think of them, and for them to stop sending any further correspondece to me, otherwise I will sue them under the protection of harassment act 1997 !! I have firmly decided that under no circumstances am I handing over one penny to them, no effin way !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all

I have just received stage two of the UKPC rip off correspondence!

They have ignored the letter I sent them telling them politely to go forth and multiply!

The letter I have just received is the ' you now have to pay £90 as you didnt pay the £45 within the 14 days'.

Im not going to even bother to waste my time replying to this second letter but If I did I would make a letter headed sheet with a company name of:

Fraudsters Unite Causing Kaous Openly Fleecing Folk Limited.......

Do you think they would get the hidden message....!!!!:-)

Edited by Binary1
Spelling check and hi lighting
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

Today I received letter 3 from UKPC. The last one I ignored which was 'explaining' if I didn't pay the £45 in fourteen days it would go up to £90, I ignored it and put it in the 'rubbish' file. Today I received letter 3 from them explaining they would 'offer me a discount if I pay withing 14 days' if I pay them the £45 they think I owe them.... and if I don't pay within the fourteen days it goes back up to £90 and they will 'put the matter in the hands of their Debt Recovery Agents'!

They also have the nerve to add ' please do not expect any response from us' if I decide to send any correspondence back to them that does not have any additional information regarding my reasons for not paying !!! How very dare they :mad2:.

The last sentence they have put is ' We hope you take advantage of the extended discount period and will send your remittance promptly' ! Its like they think this is some sort of special offer for something I am going to benefit from. What a bunch of fools. Needless to say, this third letter has joined the other two in my 'rubbish file' .:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just rung Lidl's head office and explained what is happening within their carparks. I explained my dialema and how unhappy I am and that UKPC are extorting money from Lidl customers for the pleasure of shopping in their stores. I am totally flumexed at the response from Lidl. The person I spoke to said ' you will have to take your compaint up with the parking company' ! I explained I was shopping in their store, giving them my money and had done so for quite a few years and I would not shop there again if they feel their customers are not important to them, but the lady whom I spoke to said, ' thats your choice, you have to take any parking problems up with the parking company' !! well, thats Lidls off my Christmas card list.... Tesco here I come

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always advise people to write/email and complain rather than pick up the phone.

 

It's all to do with the imposed psychology of the person who takes the call, they are under pressure (quite often self inflicted) to 'deal' with the problem completely there and then. In doing this they often fail to give due consideration to all the facts and the bigger picture.

 

If you write/email in you not only have an undisputed audit trail of your complaint but written complaints are for no apparent reason given a higher status that verbal or phone complaints.

 

Written complaints are carefully logged and assessed and a more considered response is provided. Written complaints are also used to monitor performance whereas for all you know there will be no record of your telephone complaint in the system.

 

Can I suggest that you therefore follow up with a written complaint, perhaps enclose copies of till receipts if available and give Lidl's another chance to respond.

 

If you google 'British Waterways' and 'clamping' you will find the following two quotes which counter Lidl's claim that it's nothing to do with them

 

1) Paul Watters, head of roads policy at the AA, said:

 

"Land owners have to bear some responsibility for what they allowed to happen on their land – they can't just agree a contract with a clamping firm and think it absolves them of responsibility.

 

"The credibility of well-known big firms can be severely damaged by cases like this."

 

2) Jo Abbott, spokesman for the RAC Foundation, said: "Companies needs to understand they are liable for the behaviour of their agents and motorists should be encouraged to let them know what is happening on their land."

 

Perhaps Lidl's need this pointing out to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Binary,

 

On behalf of a relative I spoke recently with Lidl and they told me that the main company that they use are ATHENA.

 

What was made CLEAR to me was that Lidl do NOT want to lose customers and that the purpose of having private car park operators is to ensure that their FREE car park is not used by people who merely want to park for free and shop elsewhere.

 

I was told that if a letter or email is sent to Lidl that the person making the complaint should enclose a copy of the bill or credit or debit card receipt to prove that purchases had been made in their store.

 

In my sisters case, she had paid cash and no longer had the receipt and I was informed that in such cases, a receipt from a PREVIOUS visit would be sufficient as this would show that my sister is a Customer of Lidl.

 

Email address: [email protected]

 

Postal address:

 

Customer Services Department

LIDL UK

Tailend Farm

Deans Road

Livingston

Scotland

EH54 8SE

Link to post
Share on other sites

...... Tesco here I come

 

Tax dodgers. Better elsewhere.......

 

Rather than Head Office - better go to the local manager.

 

BUT - the supermarket may have to pay for the speculative invoices the parking company issues if they decide to cancel them.

 

An alternative strategy is to fill the trolley up with mainly frozen goods and once it you have started to run it through the check out about halfway through - tell them you have to leave to get your car sorted out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for the good advice, I will act on all of it, especially the trolley load of frozen goods. What a wonderful ideal. I still have the till receipt for the goods I purchased on that day so hopefull this may help, but even if I get no joy from Lidl I will not be paying UKPC one penny of my hard earned cash ! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really would suggest that instead of ignoring these tickets a letter should be sent to the relevant store. Unless this happens, the store/supermarket will never be aware that the public have complaints about these private car park operators.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps there should be a sticky with the contact details of the person responsible for marketing/parking at all the big supermarkets plus a template letter. Once they start receiving a few of these template letters plus evidence of shopping, perhaps they will sit up and take notice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks tomtubby for the info about Lidl. I received one of these notices for parking at theire store in Sept. I have already complained to the Manager of the store as I was only 5 mins late in their "free" car park. I showed the Manager my receipt as proof that I was shopping in their store. He told me that they receive so many complaints and that I should write to Customer Service. I wasn't going to bother but I will now.

 

I want to complain to DVLA because they should not be allowed to sell my personal details without my consent. Does anyone have any details of where to write? Is there an email address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well.... I took the advice here to write to Lidl head office, and Friday I received this reply:

 

We refer to your recent correspondence with our Customer Service Dept regarding the Parking Charge Notice issued to you.

As you are probably aware, Lidl UK GmbH is a national retailer. As such we have stores in locations with limited parking space and in common with many of our competitors, our store car parks are abused to significant and detrimental extent.

The car park is private property and the restrictions in place are legally enforceable. The regulation pertaining to the car park use is clearly indicated on the numerous signs at the location.

Therefore in light of the above, we are unable to cancel the parking charge incurred. UKPC will request payment, in writing, in due course.

We would like to thank you for taking the time to contact our Customer Services Dept and hope that this matter can be resolved as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Yours sincerely

Pam Waite

Car park services.

 

What a cop out letter. How very dare they !! No mention of thanks for being a Lidl customer etc etc.

 

And the folllowing day I received the Final Reminder from UKPC for £90!!! This leads me to believe that Lidl and UKPC are working very closely together.

I am fuming :mad2: that even after I enclosed evidence to Lidl ( my till receipt) they have just more or less said 'go forth and multiply' !

I am not paying UKPC anything at all. No way.

Does anyone have any comments re the Lidls letter?

Thanks guys and gals for all your assistance.:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re post 14 - good idea about a sticky. Just had some joy from Aldi - going to cancel the ticket and allow extra time parking. As for Lidl - continue not to pay, try to find someone higher up the food chain. Shop elsewhere.

 

Reply and state it will only be resolved when you cancel the ticket!

 

Intend

Edited by intend
add comment
Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the mickey and write back and inquire under which law is parking legally enforceable on private property? Actually demand that they supply the law. That should give them something to think about. Otherwise don't worry yourself about it as it is unenforceable anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply's. I will send Lidl a reply asking the aformentioned question regarding proof of the law which makes it legally enforceable. I will report back when I get their reply.

Many thanks again :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

DBC, the letter was from their Head Office, not the supermarket.

I've thought about it, and to be honest I'm not even going to bother replying to either of them. Not Lidl or UKPC.

Im not going to waste my finger tips, printer ink or paper on either of them :typing:.

I will just file the letters I have received with the rest of them, shredded in the bottom of the hamster cage. At least my hamster is benefitting from the letters they are sending :panda:!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DBC, Yes it was from Lidl's head office. Sorry, I thought you thought It was from the supermarket where I got the 'Parking charge'. I would assume they are responsible for hiring the PPC and looking at the reply from them, they are cosying up together!! I wonder if they get a percentage of money extorted from motorists who unknowingly pay up. I'm sure they must do, otherwise whats the incentive to have them in their car parks driving motorists away!

As I said, I'm not going to waste my time replying to either of them. Its just like spitting in the wind !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Unfortunately it didnt work for me.

 

I wrote to lidl's head office explaining & sending proof of purchase whilst shopping in there store for only SIX minutes.

 

They wrote back saying more or less tough, pay up !! I couldnt believe it.

 

Neeedless to say I'm not paying up NO WAY.

 

If thats how appreciative they are about their customers spending hard earned cash in their stores they are worse than the morons who issue these invoices.

 

I will not be paying the invoice from UKPC, no flipping way

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...