Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

court claim forms received From HFO***Claim Discontinued***


Good_Credit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bear in mind these facts.

 

If they have only just informed you of the assignment (probably with a letter that, er, mistakenly claims to have ‘previously informed you’) then they cannot claim interest from the date of assignment – only from when you were notified of the assignment.

 

This is liable to be a fast track case, so CPR 31 is a must.

 

But first, give us a full history of all your contact with these clowns, and make that phone call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Guys,

 

Thanks for all the replies.

 

Just got in from work. I have called Barclaycard and got the following nformation -

 

Default Date - August 2007

 

Debt Sold To HFO September 2007

 

Never Made payment to HFO

 

Last Payment made to Barclaycard 16th October 2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

That explains why they have made the claim now – it was just about to become SB.

 

Do you live in Scotland by chance?

 

Have HFO or Turnbull Rutherford contacted you at all prior to receiving the claim form? Have you ever received a notice of assignment? Any letter before action?

 

Tell us about ALL of the correspondence.

 

Have you moved home since 2006?

 

Time for some CPR, I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in England

 

I have been contacted by HFO before when I received a letter that has been described on the forums. It was threatening action within 10 working days. That was almost a year ago now.

 

I have only moved address once since 2006 and that was in 2009 and I have been living at the same address since.

 

Other then that I have never been contacted by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So your first contact was almost a year ago, like many others at the time. No contact since then until the claim? We really need you to provide absolute detail. That’s where the devil is. Did you get the ‘as we have previously informed you’ letter?

 

Can you scan and post the specific letters you received?

 

In the meantime, have a look at CPR31.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you disagree with the claim. So defend.

 

You can go online and state you will be defending, and request the extra 14 days to enter your defence.

 

Look up CPR 31!

 

Time to demand copies of EVERYTHING they claim they did and sent in their extensive particulars of claim, ie. credit agreement, copies of letters sent, default notice from Barclaycard – everything. You KNOW they did not send a letter before action, but I bet one turns up. They make things up to suit their case (which I can prove), so we must be careful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I have completed the AOS part last night online. Today I sent the CPR 31 letter via Recorded delivery to the solicitors. I have a couple of questions -

 

1. Do I also need to send CRP Part 18?

2. When do I start my defence? If/When the solicitors fail to reply?

 

I have never done this before so would appreciate as much help as possible.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

3. However, Miss Margiotta on behalf of the claimant has considered the matter further with the paralegal attending her and now submits that the appropriate order that I should make is not that it be dismissed, but that it should be stayed for this reason; it had been noted that in my judgment I pointed out that there was a lack of evidence that was put forward by the claimant, and in particular identified what I regarded as perhaps a surprising and striking absence of evidence from Barclaycard. It is now suggested that I should stay the matter so that an opportunity is given for that further evidence to be obtained by Barclaycard.

 

4It would be quite wrong for me to entertain any such application. Had the claimant wished or been able to provide that evidence from Barclaycard, then the claimant ought to have produced it for this trial and not another proposed trial with consequential additional costs, and it is simply not good enough to suggest, as Miss Margiotta has, that the reason that the claimant did not produce that better evidence was because of issues of proportionality, yet now that the claimant has lost the case it should have a further opportunity to provide better evidence.

 

Thank goodness for a fair Judge. They start these claims with no information leaving the defendant at a disadvantage and then when they lose their claim.. they say .. hold on.. can we have another trial by that time we will have gathered together all the evidence ! They had more than sufficient time to have done that prior to THIS trial !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?366970-Jackthepipa-v-HFO

 

jackthepippa has his own thread now - linked above. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I hope everyone had a good weekend.

 

I received this letter. They are offereing to setlle at £3800.00 the original amount and not the £6400.00 on the court papers. What action should I take next?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I hope everyone had a good weekend.

 

I received this letter. They are offereing to setlle at £3800.00 the original amount and not the £6400.00 on the court papers. What action should I take next?

 

Thanks

Because if they went to court they would get nothing, they are probably aware you're getting advice from this forum.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...