Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, for goodness sake she needs to stop paying right now, DCA's are powerless, as .  Is it showing on their credit file? Best to use Check my file. All of the above advice is excellent, definitely SAR the loan company as soon as possible.
    • Hi all, I am wandering if this is appealable. It has already been through a challenge on the Islington website and the it was rejected. Basically there was a suspended bay sign on a post on Gee st which was obscured by a Pizza van. The suspension was for 3 bays outside 47 Gee st. I parked outside/between 47 & 55 Gee st. I paid via the phone system using a sign a few meters away from my car. When I got back to the car there was a PCN stuck to the windscreen which I had to dry out before I could read it due to rain getting into the plastic sticky holder.  I then appealed using the Islington website which was then rejected the next day. I have attached a pdf of images that I took and also which the parking officer took. There are two spaces in front of the van, one of which had a generator on it the other was a disabled space. I would count those as 3 bays? In the first image circled in red is the parking sign I read. In the 2nd image is the suspension notice obscured by the van. I would have had to stand in the middle of the road to read this, in fact that's where I was standing when I took the photo. I have pasted the appeal and rejection below. Many thanks for looking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is my appeal statement: As you can see from the image attached (image 1) I actually paid £18.50 to park my car in Gee st. I parked the car at what I thought was outside 55 Gee st as seen in image 2 attached. When I read the PCN issued it stated there was a parking suspension. There was no suspension notice on the sign that I used to call the payment service outside number 55 Gee st. I looked for a suspension notice and eventually found one which was obscured by a large van and generator parked outside 47 Gee st. As seen in images 3 and 4 attached. I am guessing the parking suspension was to allow the Van to park and sell Pizza during the Clerkenwell design week. I was not obstructing the use or parking of the van, in fact the van was obstructing the suspension notice which meant I could not read or see it without prior knowledge it was there. I would have had to stand in the road to see it endangering myself as I had to to take images to illustrate the hidden notice. As there was no intention to avoid a parking charge and the fact the sign was not easily visible I would hope this challenge can be accepted. Many thanks.   This is the text from the rejection: Thank you for contacting us about the above Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). The PCN was issued because the vehicle was parked in a suspended bay or space. I note from your correspondence that there was no suspension notice on the sign that you used to call the payment serve outside number 55 Gee Street. I acknowledge your comments, however, your vehicle was parked in a bay which had been suspended. The regulations require the suspension warning to be clearly visible. It is a large bright yellow sign and is erected by the parking bay on the nearest parking plate to the area that is to be suspended. Parking is then not permitted in the bay for any reason or period of time, however brief. The signs relating to this suspension were sited in accordance with the regulations. Upon reviewing the Civil Enforcement Officer's (CEO's) images and notes, I am satisfied that sufficient signage was in place and that it meets statutory requirements. Whilst I note that the signage may have been obstructed by a large van and generator at the time, please note, it is the responsibility of the motorist to locate and check the time plate each time they park. This will ensure that any changes to the status of the bay are noted. I acknowledge that your vehicle possessed a RingGo session at the time, however, this does not authorize parking within a suspended bay. Suspension restrictions are established to facilitate specific activities like filming or construction, therefore, we anticipate the vehicle owner to relocate the vehicle from the suspended area until the specified date and time when the suspension concludes. Leaving a vehicle unattended for any period of time within a suspended bay, effectively renders the vehicle parked in contravention and a Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) may issue a PCN. Finally, the vehicle was left parked approximately 5 metres away from the closest time plate notice. It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they park in a suitable parking place and check all signs and road markings prior to leaving their vehicle parked in contravention. It remains the driver's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is parked legally at all times. With that being said, I would have to inform you, your appeal has been rejected at this stage. Please see the below images as taken by the CEO whilst issuing the PCN: You should now choose one of the following options: Pay the penalty charge. We will accept the discounted amount of £65.00 in settlement of this matter, provided it is received by 10 June 2024. After that date, the full penalty charge of £130.00 will be payable. Or Wait for a Notice to Owner (NtO) to be issued to the registered keeper of the vehicle, who is legally responsible for paying the penalty charge. Any further correspondence received prior to the NtO being issued may not be responded to. The NtO gives the recipient the right to make formal representations against the penalty charge. If we reject those representations, there will be the right of appeal to the Environment and Traffic Adjudicator.   Gee st pdf.pdf
    • Well done.   Please let us know how it goes or come back with any questions. HB
    • Incorrect as the debt will have been legally assigned to the DCA and they are therefore now the legal creditor. Read up on debt assignment.   Andy
    • Thanks Man in the Middle and everyone it's greatly appreciated form was filled in online yesterday now just have to wait and see
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New to forum - advice on where to post (tenancy deposit)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4264 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

 

I'm new to this forum and wanted to get some advice regarding recovering my tenancy deposit. It was not protected, although my tenancy was not particularly straightforward and I'd be grateful for some advice on the issue.

 

I'm finding this forum very difficult to navigate - is there a particular section I can start a thread on advice recovering a tenancy deposit?

 

Many thanks.

 

Regards

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Everyone

 

I've just started researching how to get my deposit back from my former landlord. I'd highly appreciate any advice anybody has to offer on the issue, so I'll try and keep it as straightforward as possible.

 

Honeybee - thanks for moving the thread to the appropriate section of these forums.

 

I discovered with glee the rules regarding that since April 2007 all deposits for an assured shorthold tenancy must be held in one of the approved schemes. My deposit was not protected. However, there are some tricky caveats in my case which may or may not impinge on my rights.

 

Basic Details

 

- The rent was for a one bedroom apartment

- I moved in 11th September 2011

- I moved out 14 July 2012 (roughly ten months tenancy)

- Rent was £600 per month

- Deposit was one month's rent i.e. £600, which was paid in advance of moving in

- Minimum length of tenancy: at least 6 months, after which could terminate or move out any time with 30 days notice

 

(I’ve just read back how long the rest of my post is so will bullet point a tricky bits list here with more fuller details below it in italics for reference)

 

Tricky Details/ Further Information

 

- Paid rent and deposit in cash

- Have signed receipts for deposit and first three months rent

- No formal or written tenancy agreement

- It was technically my landlord’s principal residence, but throughout lived at his girlfriends, leaving me with virtually exclusive use of the property. This could be evidenced by the fact it is a one bedroom flat. There is a makeshift, plywood walled living area within the living room, in which my landlord stayed while renting the main room to his previous tenant, but decided when the previous tenant moved out, to rent the whole place to me and move in with his girlfriend. The room has no window or electricity, and if inspected, would almost certainly be deemed not fit for liveable accommodation

- No claims as yet for need to withhold some or all of the deposit for repairs

- No claims as yet denying I ever lived there – if he did, evidence includes: signed receipt for cash deposit; a lot of photographs on my phone of the flat; I could prove I worked nearby during my tenancy; trail of texts between us discussing the return of the deposit

- I know that my landlord did not pay income tax on his rental income, was on benefits for at least a some (or all) of the time of my tenancy and I suspect his rental earnings was not declared, and suspect that he may not have declared all his earnings from his day job (builder, electrician, handyman – cash in hand) to HMRC, or even any, should he have been on benefits throughout. This is not fully relevant but I was thinking that if I threatened to report him for this, that this may coax him into paying my deposit back (and then of course still report him anyway, because this is the right thing to do). Any thoughts?

 

 

[Now for the tricky bits. I paid my deposit and rent by cash, and there was no formal contract or agreement, only verbal, however, he said he would provide a written agreement we would both sign to the effect of the verbal agreement we'd already been over. Despite requests this was never delivered and I eventually just let it fall by the wayside. I'll admit, this was the first time I had ever moved away from my parents and my first experience renting my own place. I was offered a job in London and had very little time to find a place, and although it was old and in need of refurbishment, it was very reasonable for London prices. I viewed the property and followed up the call a few days later to agree to move in. At first I was told I could pay the deposit and monthly rent direct to my landlord's bank account. He later then told that he was having problems with his account and asked me to pay the deposit and first month’s rent in cash the day I moved in. Going forward, he asked me to pay him rent by cash instead as it was more convenient, and as at the time we had a satisfactory relationship, I had no issue with this so I did so. (After all, one could just as easily not declare income received into one’s bank account from rental income as with cash)

 

Now, to protect myself, I asked for a receipt to prove my cash payments. I have a signature for my deposit, and my first three months rent. After which, however, I naively forgot to keep asking for a receipt.

 

I gave plenty of notice and my deposit was expected to be given to me the day I moved out. This was not delivered as my landlord said he didn't have the money ready, but he would have it in a week's time for me (despite giving 5 weeks notice). A week later and more excuses. I have since moved back to the North West, and have continued contact with my landlord via text. He doesn't pick up the phone despite numerous calls (as I know he will find it difficult to come up with excuses on the spot), but have texted numerous times were I'm constantly promised the money soon, but this is usually followed by more excuses. However, I believe this is better in my circumstances as at least with texts I have a trail of communications.

 

He has not so far argued any need to deduct money from my deposit for any type of repairs. I have wondered that if I did take some form of legal action, that he may even deny my living there. I don’t of course have a written tenancy agreement, and payments weren’t to his bank account but cash. I do however have a receipt and signature for the cash deposit, many photographs of inside the flat, and a very long series of text messages back and forth between us: me asking for updates regarding the return of the deposit, and replies promising to have it soon, to call me to explain etc.

 

My landlord never stayed at the property but at his girlfriend's place. He had made a makeshift sleeping area within the living room which he did not stay in during my tenancy (with thin plywood walls erected, but no window or electricity in the 'room'; he said he stayed there while the main room was rented out to the previous tenant, but decided to move out into his girlfriend’s new place and rent the whole property to a new tenant (i.e. me) when the former tenant moved out, as the room/area was not in liveable condition). This was as far as I know his principal residence, but he lived at his girlfriend’s during my tenancy. He only had various tools (he's a builder/electrician/handyman) which from time to time he would come to collect. Even though he had his own keys/ access, he would always phone/text and ask if me for permission to return to if he needed to pickup anything work related.

 

On a slightly less relevant note, I also know this much about my landlord:

 

(i) he did not pay tax on the income from the rent of the property. I asked him this toward the end of my tenancy, as I had the gut feeling he wouldn't be returning my deposit and I wanted to catch him with something should I need to. He said he thought “it wasn’t really a big deal”.

 

(ii) I know at some point during my tenancy he was on benefits. Around the time of my moving in, he was collecting some of his belongings to move to his girlfriends, which he left in the kitchen for a few days. I did spot a Job Seekers Allowance booklet, and also a complaint letter to a welfare department regarding his benefits for his “bad back” (I swear there was nothing wrong with him). Not to pry I didn’t read his letter in full, merely came across it. However, relating to the point above, I’m very sure he did not declare any of his earnings from the rent due to the fact he did not pay income tax on it. To my knowledge you are required to declare any earnings while on any benefit, and although I can’t prove whether he did or didn’t, I certainly feel enough suspicion to be able to contact the National Benefit Fraud Hotline – I have photographs of his tools and film footage on my mobile phone of him taking his tools into his work van

 

(iii) Well by now I could reasonably guess that he may not have been declaring all (or any, for all I know) of his income tax to HMRC. Should I wish to contact HMRC based on my suspicion, I have photographs of his tools, and film footage on my mobile phone of him from my window taking tools to his van to rely on to prove he was at least working, just in case he may have been on benefits the whole time.

 

I know this section is not particularly relevant to receiving my deposit back, but recently I thought that should I need anything to coax him into returning my deposit I could threaten to report him for the above to see if that would prompt him to repay. Then of course go ahead and report him anyway, because that is the correct thing to do. Even if he would have returned my deposit in full as promised, I still would have reported him for the above.]

 

I understand I was a little unprepared for renting my first place away from home. I have certainly learned from my experience, which is at least one benefit I ever received from this arrangement.

 

Absolutely any advice would be appreciated. I would like to know what action it would be recommended to take, whether for not protecting my deposit in a scheme, or just for the return of the deposit.

 

Thanks in advance for any guidance.

 

Kind regards

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark.

 

I've merged both your threads.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know his address, send by registered post a letter telling that if he does not return your deposit in 14 days you will take him to court for non-protection/notification of your deposit, and under the new localism act he may be liable to compensate you for an addiotional amount of up to three times that.

As the contract was verbal, the default postion will be as thoughan AST standard contract existed with all it s rights and terms.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Yes, I know his address. I'm glad to know that despite my tenancy agreement not being so straightforward, largely with it being verbal, that I could still be protected.

 

I'll draft a letter this week.

 

So far, he hasn't budged so I will suspect that the letter will be ignored.

 

In which case, what would be the exact steps I would take to take him to court or some other form of action, in order to recoup the deposit and the possible additional compensation?

 

Many thanks

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the assistance.

 

I wondered, if I did take it to court, would it be very formal? i.e. both of us in a courtroom giving evidence/our view, at the same time?

 

Also slightly disappointed at the lack of response to my thread. I was wondering if I could change the subject to something like How do I recover my tenancy deposit? it may get picked up easier.

 

Thanks very much for the help.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Small cliams track is fairly informal, judge will review depositions and responses and ask questions etc., costs are minimal, however if you are claiming for non-notification or protection it may get put on county court fast tractk which can be costly up front and you would be liable for all costs if you lose.

You need to speak to court about track allocation and costs, or search on courts website.

you can also start an action on line using MCOL system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...