Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok I've used office to change to pdf, when I try to add files I don't get the choice to, just camera and media picker. H
    • Hi  Any free apps to download to pdf from android  H
    • Ok it's defence week, I need to upload 2 pics of the letters from overdales from my phone to put on here to be checked so I can file my defence. Cheers H
    • Today as the registered keeper of the vehicle photographed, I received a Parking Charge Notice, for a private land car park. I have looked at streetview and I dont think the signs are noticable, they were not placed on entry to the parking area, but on lamposts around the plot. It's not ANPR monitored but must've had someone on foot as they had photo of the vehicle parked in a bay. Is this one worth contesting or will it have to be paid?   1 Date of the infringement 28/5/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 4/6/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 10/6/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Parking&Property Management LTD   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] 34-39 Magnolia House & 1-83 Cedar House Spelthorne Grove, Sunbury - on - Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7.   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. It doesnt seem to. It states they operate in accordance with the International Parking Community's Code of Practice (IPC). On the back it says "Contesting this parking Charge" and under this heading it states that "all letters contesting a parking charge are carefully considered and replied to within 28 days. Charges are put on hold until an appeals decision has been reached. If we reject the appeal, you will be provided with the contact details of the Independent Appeals Service."   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here Nothing else received PARKING NOTICE.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long does a reconsideration of a sanction take?


snoid01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If your JSA is sanctioned you first submit a reconsideration form, then if that is rejected an appeal form.

 

So i submitted my reconsideration form 2 weeks ago, i forgot to ask at my signing today if there was ny news though, but I've heard anywhere between 2 weeks and 6 months. But I've also heard that the reconsideration should be quite quick as it's the appeal that takes forever.

 

I was also told that i would receive something in writing as to the decision, but i also appealed for hardship and was told over the phone when i was inquiring about something else that the hardship request was rejected even though i have nothing in writing about the hardship as of yet. I guess they will come to a decision one way or another but just wondering time scales?

 

Well all these new(i assume) JSA sanctions for missing back to work appointments will certainly keep the DWP on their feet, that's for sure they must be inundated with paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no specific length of time involved I'm afraid, it depends on staffing levels, firstly at the JCP office where the paperwork needs to be put together and invoiced to the DMA team and then sent via courier to the DMA team.

The DMA team will receive the request and it will be referred to a different memeber of staff that made the original decision who will look at the new and additional information that you supplied before they can determine if the decision can be changed or not.

If the decision can't be changed then it will go appeal which is approx a 6 months wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no specific length of time involved I'm afraid, it depends on staffing levels, firstly at the JCP office where the paperwork needs to be put together and invoiced to the DMA team and then sent via courier to the DMA team.

The DMA team will receive the request and it will be referred to a different memeber of staff that made the original decision who will look at the new and additional information that you supplied before they can determine if the decision can be changed or not.

If the decision can't be changed then it will go appeal which is approx a 6 months wait.

 

 

Thanks, why does it take 6 months?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you on the work programme at the moment and was it a WP appointment that you missed?

Hardship is not payable to WP participants unless they fall into a vunerable group.

Hardship for customers who are not yet mandated to the WP is different and is usually payable from the 15th calender day of the sanction unless a member of the benefit claim falls into a vunerable group and then it is payable from the first day of the sanction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you on the work programme at the moment and was it a WP appointment that you missed?

Hardship is not payable to WP participants unless they fall into a vunerable group.

Hardship for customers who are not yet mandated to the WP is different and is usually payable from the 15th calender day of the sanction unless a member of the benefit claim falls into a vunerable group and then it is payable from the first day of the sanction.

 

It's A4E and your right they said i wasn't vulnerable, so how come if your not on the WP you don't need to be vulnerable for hardship whereas if you are you do, i think having no food is vulnerable?

 

Do you work for the JC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I work for JCP, once you are with the WP the rules for hardship change and you only qualify if you fall into the vunerable group.

I don't know the reasons behind it but I suspect it's to ensure that you do attend the meetings with the providers and if you eventually hit the (current) 26 week sancton you have to show that you have re-engaged with the provider and they can the refer back to DMA for the sanction to be reviewed as you are now participating in full but they can actually request that you attend weekly or more frequently for a period between 4 and 8 weeks before they refer back to DMA.

If hardship was payable during that period there would be no financial incentive to return to the programme.

The sanctions are changing and it will eventually be increased to a maximum of 3 years as opposed to the current 26 weeks!

 

With regards to the food issue they would state that you could attend a food bank and could be given a referral for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I work for JCP, once you are with the WP the rules for hardship change and you only qualify if you fall into the vunerable group.

I don't know the reasons behind it but I suspect it's to ensure that you do attend the meetings with the providers and if you eventually hit the (current) 26 week sancton you have to show that you have re-engaged with the provider and they can the refer back to DMA for the sanction to be reviewed as you are now participating in full but they can actually request that you attend weekly or more frequently for a period between 4 and 8 weeks before they refer back to DMA.

If hardship was payable during that period there would be no financial incentive to return to the programme.

The sanctions are changing and it will eventually be increased to a maximum of 3 years as opposed to the current 26 weeks!

 

With regards to the food issue they would state that you could attend a food bank and could be given a referral for that.

 

 

Thanks again, are these sanctions a new thing, i take it it's the "old Tories" again, or have they been in for a while?

 

26 weeks is long enough, might as well be 3 years. So i have been asked to take a course at A4E and then a possible job relating to this new skill, something i wouldn't even have considered, i know within myself that i won't last long at a job at the moment, i technically probably could claim ESA(but maybe not, i'm not sure), so i don't have much choice but to take this course and job. I won't last long in it that is for sure anyway. So what happens then if i get fired or whatever?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on how long you remain employed, as you are mandated to the providers for a 2 year period if you are dismissed or leave within that 2 year period and reclaim JSA you will be referred directly back to the provider to continue with them until theend of your provision.

DMA may look at the reasons why your job ended and you could receive a sanction but as the scenario hasn't yet happened noone can give you a definite answer with regards to the DMA part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...