Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
    • think about it, if you don't pay the full amount, what more can they do , default you  they've already registered a default notice by that point.  why have you got to await sale to a DCA.... for what?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with mobile phone contract from Carphone Warehouse


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is what it says on their website:-

 

Returning or exchanging items bought online or over the phone

You can return most products within 14 days

 

You can return or exchange almost anything you buy from us online or over the phone. As long as you let us know within 14 days of the day we first try to deliver your product.

 

What can't I return or exchange?

 

Top-ups - bought instore, online, over the phone or on your mobile.

Ringtones, downloads, Talk2Text or graphics.

Personal Bluetooth headsets (this is for hygiene reasons).

Car kits once they've been installed. Give us a call on 0870 087 6626^ if you want to cancel an installation.

Home broadband once it's been installed - please contact your broadband provider if you want to cancel your contract after installation.

On some phone networks you can return your phone but you can't exchange it. This affects phones on these networks:

 

T-Mobile

3

Talkmobile

Orange (this only affects Pay monthly Orange handsets that are branded with the Orange logo)

This means that if you want to change your product for something else, you'll need to return it for a full refund and then make a new purchase. You may lose the phone number you were given, you may have to take an extra credit check, and the whole process may take a few days longer than if you were doing a straight exchange.

 

As my phone is on the Vodafone network, I am able to exchange it, whereas if it was on another network I could only return it but Carphone Warehouse have said I cannot exchange or return it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You CAN exchange it. It is your statutory right. Especially since you told them within 14 days. Keep the pressure on them and theyll buckle. If they try the "gesture of goodwill" trick, make sure to file a full complaint. That phrase means they know they have done wrong, but will not admit it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help though, I appreciate it and I will put a lot of pressure on them as I know I am being fobbed off, If they want to be taken to Court then that is what will happen.

 

Also, I've told them now not to phone me but to correspond via email for future reference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got an email, this looks like Carphone Warehouse's final response:-

 

Thank you for your email.

 

I'm sorry to hear that your chosen handset does not meet with your expectations.

 

The Carphone Warehouse is fully compliant with distance selling regulations, and has chosen to offer a returns policy which exceeds the minimum requirements.

 

Items ordered over the phone or online can be returned unused by customers. Customers are able to inspect the handset to obtain and look and feel of the product.

 

Once a SIM card has been inserted in a handset and a connection made this confirms acceptance of the contract; and the product if returned cannot be resold as new.

 

I can see from your email that you have reviewed our terms and conditions. The information you have provided can be found via the following link:

 

http://selfhelp.carphonewarehouse.com/SelfHelp/request.do?view()=c{1ff75c90-bcb9-11de-e56d-000000000000}

 

On this page below the exert of information which you have provided, our returns terms and conditions also state the following information:

 

Can I try out my product first?

 

Depending on what you bought, there are different rules about how much you can use your product before you decide to take it back. Find out more about what condition your product should be in when you return or exchange it.

 

Via this paragraph, you can also click on the hyperlinked text 'what condition your product should be in when you return or exchange it.' This will take you to another page which states the following information:

 

What condition should my product be in when I return or exchange it?

 

Mobile phones

 

What you can do with the phone before you make a change of mind return or exchange

 

You can turn the phone on and try it out. But you can't make any calls or send texts, or add anything to the phone's memory (such as saving numbers or taking a photo).

 

I understand that you are not happy with the response which has been previously provided. As you have used your SIM card in the handset this means that the handset can no longer be returned or exchanged without the value of the contract being paid to the network provider Vodafone.

 

As we are not in breach of our returns policy and terms and conditions, in this instance we cannot exchange or return your handset.

 

Kind Regards

 

Looks like it's time to report this to Trading Standards then and take them to court via Money Claims Online, agree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply answer, theyre full of crap. Statutory law still applies, regardless of if you put a sim in it or not. You are well within your rights for the first 7-14 days to request a refund or replacement.

 

I think it might be time you hunt out a solicitor that deals with this kind of stuff, and who can do the first consultation free.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, I think I will inform them tonight that I am reporting them to Trading Standards, I could just open a claim through Money Claims Online couldn't I and do it that way instead of seeing a solicitor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just dint see how they can justify not giving you the right to cancel, or putting a clause on it that breaches your Statutory rights.

 

As for a MCO claim, speak to trading standards first and see what they say. They take action after you have gotten their advice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is it's only a very simple exchange, phone for phone, what's so hard about that? I think I have a strong case to take this to Court and win but I will follow your advice first.

 

I will inform them that I'm reporting them to Trading Standards which I will and that I plan on taking them to Court and inform them I have a good case and believe they are in the wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading standards should be able to point you in the right direction. They have all the knowledge and legal headwork to know the best course of action.

 

Just remember, if you make a court claim, you will need to have a very good and solid case, as CW will undoubtedly defend any legal action, and they have very deep pockets, so they will employ a very good legal team.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lately with civil cases, cases seem to be won on not who is right or wrong, but how good your lawyer is.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

very true. Lets see what trading standards have to say. CW are basically saying you are not entitled to a refund, replacement or exchange, even though you are within the cancellation period.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure to tell TS that too.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed Trading Standards and they told me to ring Citizens Advice Consumer Service which I did.

 

They have said that as I first emailed the Chief Executive on 15th August 2012, I was just inside the period of cancellation under Distance Selling Regulations, he told me that Carphone Warehouse were obviously arguing that I had accepted the phone whereas I argue that I did not.

 

The advice given was to send one last email to Carphone Warehouse quoting the Distance Selling Regulations and state that I have not accepted the item and attempted to return it within the 7 working days period under the DSR regulations.

 

Also I was told that it wasn't for Carphone Warehouse to decide whether I had accepted the phone or not, it was up to the judge, I was told I might win I might lose but I do have a case and that if Carphone Warehouse do not comply with my request then I have been told to take them to Court, I will do if required.

 

The Consumer Service have also reported Carphone Warehouse to trading standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers crossed it works out for you. At least you know you have a case because they are breaking regulation. Now lets see what CW decide to do. Im thinking they will come back with a gesture of goodwill.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you send the last e-mail to Carphone Warehouse, on the letter write the following :- Ref:- Trading Standards / Citizens Advice Service, Noxxxxxxx

 

I emailed Trading Standards and they told me to ring Citizens Advice Consumer Service which I did.

 

They have said that as I first emailed the Chief Executive on 15th August 2012, I was just inside the period of cancellation under Distance Selling Regulations, he told me that Carphone Warehouse were obviously arguing that I had accepted the phone whereas I argue that I did not.

 

The advice given was to send one last email to Carphone Warehouse quoting the Distance Selling Regulations and state that I have not accepted the item and attempted to return it within the 7 working days period under the DSR regulations.

 

Also I was told that it wasn't for Carphone Warehouse to decide whether I had accepted the phone or not, it was up to the judge, I was told I might win I might lose but I do have a case and that if Carphone Warehouse do not comply with my request then I have been told to take them to Court, I will do if required.

 

The Consumer Service have also reported Carphone Warehouse to trading standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, my case is strengthened by the fact the Store Manager twice agreed to an exchange only to be then told by other staff members it could not be done.

 

I first attempted to exchange on 13th August then I first contacted the Chief Executive on the 15th August.

 

I just think they are in the wrong and hope they will see that, will they take the chance of losing in court? I think you might be right renegadeimp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They aren't budging, got this email today:-

 

Thank you for your email.

 

I am sorry to hear that you are not happy with the response which we have provided.

 

I would like to advise that the basis of our decision is that you have used your handset and SIM card.

 

It is part of our returns terms and conditions that the handset must be unused in order to be returned. The handset may be inspected but the SIM card cannot be inserted and used if a return is required. This is specified in the returns policy.

 

I am sorry that we cannot provide the resolution which you have requested, if you have any questions regarding this please don't hesitate to reply to this email and I will be happy to help.

 

Kind Regards

 

Court it is then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Handset must be unused? Umm.. wrong. Thats why the law/regulations and 7-14 day statutory right laws exist.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...